Investment Banking Company Statistics - As of December, 2020

These statistics are based solely on the user submissions to the WSO Company Database for employment during 2018, 2019, 2020. Each company is given an adjusted score using Bayesian estimates, which takes into account the number of reviews for a particular company. For more details, please see the Methodology FAQ below.
Hardest Interviews (1) (2)
What bank has the hardest interview?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Centerview Partners
No
99.5%
Qatalyst Partners
04
98.9%
PJT Partners
01
98.4%
Ducera
05
97.9%
Moelis & Company
02
97.4%
Evercore
02
96.8%
Millstein and Co
02
96.3%
Greenhill
01
95.8%
Stout Risius Ross
17
95.2%
Union Square Advisors
02
94.7%
Houlihan Lokey
01
94.2%
Financial Technology Partners
No
93.7%
Lazard, Inc.
08
93.1%
DC Advisory
New
92.6%
LionTree Advisors
01
92.1%
Tudor Pickering Holt and Co
04
91.5%
Perella Weinberg Partners
06
91.0%
M Klein and Company
01
90.5%
Citigroup
06
89.9%
Morgan Stanley
05
89.4%
Rothschild
03
88.9%
Goldman Sachs
05
88.4%
Imperial Capital
05
87.8%
JMP Group
New
87.3%
Financo
02
86.8%
RBS Royal Bank of Scotland
01
86.2%
JPMorgan
New
85.7%
HSBC
06
85.2%
Société Générale
01
84.7%
Guggenheim Partners
11
84.1%

Percentile calculated only based off of investment banks that received at least two interview insights (189 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Interview Experience (1) (2)
What bank has the best interview experience?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Harris Williams & Co.
05
99.5%
William Blair
01
98.9%
PNC Financial Services
01
98.4%
Jefferies & Company
06
97.9%
Imperial Capital
03
97.4%
Wells Fargo and Company
08
96.8%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
20
96.3%
Piper Jaffray
04
95.8%
Torreya Partners
New
95.2%
BMO Capital Markets
New
94.7%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
No
94.2%
Barclays
New
93.7%
Lincoln International
03
93.1%
Rothschild
06
92.6%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
12
92.1%
PJT Partners
13
91.5%
BNP Paribas
New
91.0%
Canaccord Genuity
01
90.5%
Credit Suisse
04
89.9%
Nomura Holdings
03
89.4%
Houlihan Lokey
08
88.9%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
88.4%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
15
87.8%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
New
87.3%
UBS AG
New
86.8%
Stout Risius Ross
01
86.2%
RBC Capital Markets
09
85.7%
Guggenheim Partners
19
85.2%
Deutsche Bank
01
84.7%
Piper Sandler
06
84.1%

Percentile calculated only based off of investment banks that received at least two interview insights (189 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Prepare for Your Investment Banking Interview

Professional Growth and Career Opportunities - 330 Investment Banks

Overall Employee Satisfaction (1) (2)
Overall how satisfied are you working for this company?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
PJT Partners
02
99.7%
Evercore
02
99.4%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
03
99.1%
Greenhill
19
98.8%
William Blair
03
98.5%
Moelis & Company
01
98.2%
Lazard, Inc.
No
97.9%
Guggenheim Partners
02
97.6%
Lincoln International
08
97.3%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
07
97.0%
Rothschild
13
96.7%
Goldman Sachs
03
96.4%
Perella Weinberg Partners
02
96.1%
Piper Jaffray
02
95.8%
RBC Capital Markets
01
95.5%
Houlihan Lokey
08
95.2%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
01
94.8%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
05
94.5%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
03
94.2%
Morgan Stanley
09
93.9%
Barclays
01
93.6%
Wells Fargo and Company
03
93.3%
JPMorgan
11
93.0%
Credit Suisse
03
92.7%
TD Securities
04
92.4%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
No
92.1%
Nomura Holdings
New
91.8%
Cain Brothers
No
91.5%
UBS AG
04
91.2%
Citigroup
No
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (330 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Professional Growth Opportunities (1) (2)
Your opportunities for professional growth?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
02
99.7%
Lazard, Inc.
01
99.4%
PJT Partners
03
99.1%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
06
98.8%
Goldman Sachs
01
98.5%
Moelis & Company
04
98.2%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
04
97.9%
William Blair
03
97.6%
Houlihan Lokey
01
97.3%
Greenhill
16
97.0%
Rothschild
09
96.7%
Morgan Stanley
05
96.4%
Lincoln International
04
96.1%
Guggenheim Partners
03
95.8%
JPMorgan
01
95.5%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
03
95.2%
RBC Capital Markets
05
94.9%
Credit Suisse
01
94.6%
Piper Jaffray
02
94.3%
Jefferies & Company
05
94.0%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
09
93.7%
Barclays
04
93.4%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
07
93.1%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
92.8%
Stout Risius Ross
New
92.5%
Citigroup
10
92.2%
Perella Weinberg Partners
12
91.9%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
91.6%
Cowen Group
New
91.3%
Nomura Holdings
New
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (334 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Career Advancement Opportunities (1) (2)
Your opportunities for career advancement?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
05
99.7%
Lazard, Inc.
No
99.4%
PJT Partners
02
99.1%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
04
98.8%
Goldman Sachs
01
98.5%
Moelis & Company
05
98.2%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
05
97.9%
Rothschild
05
97.6%
Houlihan Lokey
01
97.3%
Lincoln International
01
97.0%
Morgan Stanley
04
96.7%
William Blair
09
96.4%
RBC Capital Markets
06
96.1%
Greenhill
13
95.8%
JPMorgan
01
95.5%
Credit Suisse
01
95.2%
Piper Jaffray
03
94.9%
Perella Weinberg Partners
07
94.6%
Wells Fargo and Company
02
94.3%
Barclays
02
94.0%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
02
93.7%
China International Capital Corporation
New
93.4%
CIBC World Markets
New
93.1%
Cowen Group
New
92.8%
Jefferies & Company
03
92.5%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
10
92.2%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
02
91.9%
BMO Capital Markets
No
91.6%
UBS AG
08
91.3%
Citigroup
06
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (335 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Intern Offer Rates (1)
Average percentage of interns receiving full time offers
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Miller Buckfire
No
100.0%
Sagent Advisors
01
100.0%
Wedbush
17
100.0%
Antarctica Advisors LLC
No
100.0%
Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc.
New
100.0%
Lazard Freres
New
100.0%
Union Square Advisors
01
95.7%
Simmons & Company International
03
95.0%
Cain Brothers
02
94.4%
Lincoln International
02
93.3%
FMI Corporation
02
90.0%
Bowen Advisors
02
90.0%
Ziegler
02
90.0%
Daiwa Securities Group
02
90.0%
Peter J Solomon
02
90.0%
Midtown Partners
02
90.0%
Renaissance Capital
02
90.0%
Craig Hallum
02
90.0%
PJ SOLOMON
New
90.0%
Centerview Partners
New
87.5%
Guggenheim Partners
03
86.9%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
03
86.0%
TD Securities
06
85.7%
Perella Weinberg Partners
02
85.0%
Tudor Pickering Holt and Co
New
84.0%

Simple average based off of investment banks that received at least one intern offer data point (165 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Promotions and Fairness - 330 Investment Banks

Feedback (1) (2)
Feedback you receive about your job performance?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
03
99.7%
Lincoln International
01
99.4%
Guggenheim Partners
17
99.1%
Lazard, Inc.
02
98.8%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
07
98.5%
Rothschild
17
98.2%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
04
97.9%
Greenhill
New
97.6%
Goldman Sachs
03
97.3%
China International Capital Corporation
17
97.0%
BNP Paribas
02
96.7%
William Blair
07
96.4%
PJT Partners
06
96.1%
RBC Capital Markets
08
95.8%
Wells Fargo and Company
03
95.5%
Piper Jaffray
No
95.2%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
03
94.9%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
09
94.6%
Moelis & Company
11
94.3%
Morgan Stanley
09
94.0%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
02
93.7%
Houlihan Lokey
12
93.4%
Barclays
08
93.1%
Credit Suisse
04
92.8%
JPMorgan
08
92.5%
Perella Weinberg Partners
New
92.2%
UBS AG
06
91.9%
HSBC
02
91.6%
CIBC World Markets
New
91.3%
Citigroup
New
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (332 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Recognition (1) (2)
Recognition and praise you receive when you do a good job?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Robert W. Baird & Co.
05
99.7%
Evercore
03
99.4%
Lincoln International
02
99.1%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
07
98.8%
Greenhill
15
98.5%
William Blair
01
98.2%
Lazard, Inc.
02
97.9%
China International Capital Corporation
New
97.6%
PJT Partners
05
97.3%
Moelis & Company
08
97.0%
Barclays
06
96.7%
Guggenheim Partners
11
96.4%
Piper Jaffray
05
96.1%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
02
95.8%
Wells Fargo and Company
No
95.5%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
05
95.2%
Nomura Holdings
12
94.9%
Goldman Sachs
05
94.6%
Credit Suisse
07
94.3%
Houlihan Lokey
10
94.0%
JMP Group
13
93.7%
Stout Risius Ross
New
93.4%
Wedbush
New
93.1%
Progress Partners
New
92.8%
Perella Weinberg Partners
New
92.5%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
92.2%
Deutsche Bank
08
91.9%
Cain Brothers
14
91.6%
Morgan Stanley
13
91.3%
JPMorgan
06
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (332 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Most Fair (1) (2)
Fairness in how promotions are given and people are treated?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Robert W. Baird & Co.
05
99.7%
PJT Partners
01
99.4%
Evercore
01
99.1%
Greenhill
19
98.8%
Wells Fargo and Company
No
98.5%
Westlake Securities
New
98.2%
William Blair
04
97.9%
Piper Jaffray
04
97.6%
Lazard, Inc.
01
97.3%
Moelis & Company
06
97.0%
Barclays
No
96.7%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
03
96.4%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
04
96.1%
Stout Risius Ross
New
95.8%
Rothschild
09
95.5%
Nomura Holdings
02
95.2%
UBS AG
07
94.8%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
02
94.5%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
06
94.2%
Lincoln International
13
93.9%
RBC Capital Markets
03
93.6%
Goldman Sachs
09
93.3%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
04
93.0%
Credit Suisse
03
92.7%
Morgan Stanley
06
92.4%
Guggenheim Partners
New
92.1%
Centerview Partners
New
91.8%
Natixis
02
91.5%
JPMorgan
07
91.2%
BNP Paribas
No
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (330 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

All Company Specific Reviews Available

Compensation - 330 Investment Banks

Best Pay (1) (2)
Your compensation compared with similar jobs elsewhere?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
No
99.7%
PJT Partners
04
99.4%
Moelis & Company
01
99.1%
William Blair
01
98.8%
Guggenheim Partners
02
98.5%
Piper Jaffray
04
98.2%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
12
97.9%
Lazard, Inc.
01
97.6%
Greenhill
06
97.3%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
02
97.0%
Houlihan Lokey
06
96.7%
Goldman Sachs
04
96.4%
Rothschild
15
96.1%
Credit Suisse
07
95.8%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
95.5%
Morgan Stanley
03
95.2%
RBC Capital Markets
05
94.9%
Barclays
02
94.6%
Harris Williams & Co.
New
94.3%
Citigroup
03
94.0%
Centerview Partners
17
93.7%
Nomura Holdings
03
93.4%
Perella Weinberg Partners
12
93.1%
JPMorgan
06
92.7%
Jefferies & Company
04
92.4%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
92.1%
Lincoln International
15
91.8%
CIBC World Markets
New
91.5%
Deutsche Bank
05
91.2%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
New
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (331 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Senior Management - 330 Investment Banks

Best Communication (1) (2)
Communications from management about important issues and changes?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
PJT Partners
No
99.7%
Evercore
02
99.4%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
02
99.1%
TD Securities
New
98.8%
Lincoln International
03
98.5%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
05
98.2%
Moelis & Company
01
97.9%
Piper Jaffray
05
97.6%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
17
97.3%
Greenhill
New
97.0%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
13
96.7%
William Blair
02
96.4%
Cowen Group
06
96.1%
Westlake Securities
New
95.8%
Lazard, Inc.
08
95.5%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
04
95.2%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
04
94.8%
Rothschild
02
94.5%
Goldman Sachs
11
94.2%
RBC Capital Markets
06
93.9%
Barclays
05
93.6%
Morgan Stanley
13
93.3%
Guggenheim Partners
05
93.0%
Natixis
New
92.7%
Wells Fargo and Company
10
92.4%
Credit Suisse
02
92.1%
Centerview Partners
03
91.8%
Houlihan Lokey
03
91.5%
JPMorgan
12
91.2%
UBS AG
07
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (330 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Teamwork (1) (2)
Information and knowledge sharing withing company?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Robert W. Baird & Co.
06
99.7%
Evercore
01
99.4%
PJT Partners
01
99.1%
Greenhill
12
98.8%
William Blair
03
98.5%
Cain Brothers
04
98.2%
Moelis & Company
06
97.9%
Rothschild
11
97.6%
Lazard, Inc.
01
97.3%
Lincoln International
07
97.0%
Goldman Sachs
05
96.7%
Morgan Stanley
07
96.4%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
02
96.1%
Houlihan Lokey
01
95.8%
Piper Jaffray
05
95.5%
Stout Risius Ross
07
95.2%
Guggenheim Partners
05
94.9%
Barclays
No
94.6%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
08
94.3%
Cowen Group
New
94.0%
RBC Capital Markets
07
93.7%
Credit Suisse
01
93.4%
Harris Williams & Co.
New
93.1%
Perella Weinberg Partners
New
92.8%
JPMorgan
10
92.5%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
03
92.2%
Centerview Partners
New
91.9%
Progress Partners
New
91.6%
MTS Health Partners
New
91.3%
Citigroup
08
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (332 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Leadership (1) (2)
Leadership abilities of senior management?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
01
99.7%
PJT Partners
01
99.4%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
05
99.1%
Lincoln International
03
98.8%
William Blair
01
98.5%
Lazard, Inc.
01
98.2%
Westlake Securities
New
97.9%
Perella Weinberg Partners
04
97.6%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
09
97.3%
Goldman Sachs
03
97.0%
Morgan Stanley
05
96.7%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
01
96.4%
Piper Jaffray
No
96.1%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
No
95.8%
Cain Brothers
05
95.5%
China International Capital Corporation
New
95.2%
Moelis & Company
08
94.9%
RBC Capital Markets
02
94.6%
Greenhill
New
94.3%
Rothschild
05
94.0%
Barclays
02
93.7%
JPMorgan
07
93.4%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
06
93.1%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
03
92.8%
Houlihan Lokey
15
92.5%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
92.2%
Guggenheim Partners
01
91.9%
Nomura Holdings
New
91.6%
TD Securities
06
91.3%
Credit Suisse
01
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (332 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Competence (1) (2)
Competence of senior management?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
01
99.7%
Lincoln International
01
99.4%
PJT Partners
No
99.1%
Rothschild
05
98.8%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
09
98.5%
Lazard, Inc.
01
98.2%
William Blair
03
97.9%
Goldman Sachs
02
97.6%
Moelis & Company
01
97.3%
Cain Brothers
07
97.0%
Piper Jaffray
02
96.7%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
No
96.4%
Greenhill
New
96.1%
Perella Weinberg Partners
07
95.8%
Morgan Stanley
04
95.5%
Houlihan Lokey
10
95.2%
RBC Capital Markets
01
94.9%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
94.6%
Barclays
03
94.3%
Guggenheim Partners
No
94.0%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
07
93.7%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
02
93.4%
JPMorgan
05
93.1%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
01
92.7%
TD Securities
01
92.4%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
11
92.1%
BMO Capital Markets
No
91.8%
Stout Risius Ross
New
91.5%
Credit Suisse
04
91.2%
Centerview Partners
11
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (331 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Thousands of Interview Questions Available by Firm

Reputation - 330 Investment Banks

Proudest Employees (1) (2)
Company as a place you are proud to work?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Lazard, Inc.
No
99.7%
Evercore
03
99.4%
PJT Partners
03
99.1%
Goldman Sachs
02
98.8%
Moelis & Company
02
98.5%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
06
98.2%
Rothschild
04
97.9%
Morgan Stanley
04
97.6%
JPMorgan
01
97.3%
Greenhill
10
97.0%
William Blair
04
96.7%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
01
96.4%
Barclays
02
96.1%
Lincoln International
04
95.8%
Piper Jaffray
04
95.5%
Guggenheim Partners
No
95.2%
RBC Capital Markets
No
94.9%
Houlihan Lokey
09
94.6%
Credit Suisse
05
94.3%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
02
94.0%
Perella Weinberg Partners
03
93.7%
TD Securities
01
93.4%
China International Capital Corporation
New
93.1%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
92.8%
Citigroup
02
92.5%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
01
92.2%
Jefferies & Company
03
91.9%
Centerview Partners
02
91.6%
UBS AG
04
91.3%
Stout Risius Ross
New
91.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (332 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Life Style - 330 Investment Banks

Time Off (1) (2)
Management support for needed time off?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
01
99.7%
William Blair
01
99.4%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
02
99.1%
Natixis
11
98.8%
Duff & Phelps
New
98.5%
Nomura Holdings
11
98.2%
Cain Brothers
13
97.9%
RBS Royal Bank of Scotland
New
97.6%
Evercore
03
97.3%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
02
97.0%
Greenhill
18
96.7%
Westlake Securities
New
96.4%
Lincoln International
03
96.1%
PJT Partners
04
95.8%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
09
95.5%
Barclays
05
95.2%
Wells Fargo and Company
04
94.8%
RBC Capital Markets
04
94.5%
Capstone Headwaters
New
94.2%
Credit Agricole
13
93.9%
MTS Health Partners
New
93.6%
MUFG
18
93.3%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
No
93.0%
China International Capital Corporation
No
92.7%
UBS AG
07
92.4%
BNP Paribas
01
92.1%
Rothschild
New
91.8%
JPMorgan
09
91.5%
National Bank Financial Group
New
91.2%
Lazard, Inc.
05
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (330 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Work/Life Balance (1) (2)
Employer support in balancing between work life and personal life?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Natixis
03
99.7%
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey STRH
No
99.4%
MUFG
No
99.1%
Credit Agricole
06
98.8%
Stout Risius Ross
11
98.5%
KeyBanc Capital Markets
01
98.2%
Westlake Securities
New
97.9%
Nomura Holdings
02
97.6%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
13
97.3%
BNP Paribas
03
97.0%
IndustryPro
02
96.7%
PNC Financial Services
11
96.4%
Wells Fargo and Company
04
96.1%
William Blair
03
95.8%
Duff & Phelps
New
95.5%
HSBC
04
95.2%
PJT Partners
02
94.8%
Société Générale
10
94.5%
Barclays
01
94.2%
Evercore
07
93.9%
Lazard, Inc.
03
93.6%
Cain Brothers
New
93.3%
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
04
93.0%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
02
92.7%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
92.4%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
03
92.1%
Copper Run Capital
New
91.8%
UBS AG
11
91.5%
Progress Partners
New
91.2%
Fifth Third Bank
New
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (330 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Worst Work/Life Balance (1) (2)
Employer support in balancing between work life and personal life?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Roth Capital Partners
New
99.7%
Hilliard Lyons Investment Banking
01
99.4%
Ducera
New
99.1%
Atlas Technology Group
03
98.8%
Carnegie Investment Bank AB
07
98.5%
Torreya Partners
New
98.2%
Bowen Advisors
New
97.9%
Korea Investment and Securities
02
97.6%
Bank of China
10
97.3%
Parcrest Advisors
03
97.0%
Duncan-Williams, Inc.
New
96.7%
Montgomery & Co.
04
96.4%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
05
96.1%
Gleacher Shacklock
New
95.8%
Mediobanca
New
95.5%
Sagent Advisors
05
95.2%
Avista Advisory Group
06
94.8%
Greentech Capital Advisors
04
94.5%
Imperial Capital
New
94.2%
Ramirez and Co
04
93.9%
Union Gaming Securities
04
93.6%
Guotai Junan International
New
93.3%
MHT Partners
New
93.0%
Edgemont Capital Partners
07
92.7%
Heritage Capital Group
New
92.4%
Millstein and Co
New
92.1%
Chardan Capital Markets
New
91.8%
CohnReznick Capital
01
91.5%
Madison Street Capital
New
91.2%
Peters & Co.
01
90.9%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (330 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Most Average Hours Worked (1)
How many hours do you work an average?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Miller Buckfire
No
87.5
Pagemill Partners
15
87.5
Craig Hallum
04
87.5
Greentech Capital Advisors
01
86.3
CVCapital
10
85.0
AltaCorp Capital Inc
New
85.0
Financial Technology Partners
02
83.8
National Bank Financial Markets
02
83.3
Agentis Capital
07
83.0
Brown Gibbons Lang and Company
04
82.7
Simmons & Company International
07
82.5
Agricultural Bank of China
01
82.5
Millstein and Co
New
82.5
Mooreland Partners
06
82.5
GF Securities
03
82.5
Carnegie Investment Bank AB
New
81.7
Stonybrook Capital
New
81.7
CohnReznick Capital
New
81.7
Financiére Cambon
New
81.7
DC Advisory
07
81.0
Leerink Partners
02
80.4
Signal Hill Capital Group
04
80.0
Intrepid Investment Bankers
New
80.0
Kimberlite
New
80.0
Raine Group
New
80.0
Sagent Advisors
03
80.0
Peters & Co.
No
80.0
Incentrum Group
New
80.0
Moelis & Company
13
79.5
Itaú BBA
New
79.3

Only includes investment banks that received at least three submissions with hourly data (295 total firms).

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Thousands of Interview Questions Available by Firm

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.