Hedge Fund College Recruitment
Hey guys,
I am a summer analyst at a top tier bulge bracket investment bank, and I go to a target school. I want to break into the hedge fund world sooner rather than later as I dislike investment banking, and I was wondering if you guys had any idea who recruits straight out of college (i.e. who has a program for undergraduates, not something you would have to get through connections)
Thanks
Disclaimer: I'm a student as well, so take this all with a grain of salt.
As far as big funds go, no idea. However, smaller funds are a lot less cut and dry as to who they will recruit. If you can show them that you have the skillset necessary, then you might be able to pull a FT out of school offer. That means you'll have to know how to build models, you'll have to know the markets really well, and you'll have to show them that you're not just another monkey and can generate ideas (while being able to take shit from your PM for fucking up, because you won't be perfect and that will happen).
It's a numbers game, too. If you contact 1,000 hedge funds, you might only get responses from 5 (although I bet you'll do better than that). Conversely the first one you contact might miraculously give you a job. Also keep in mind that as you have no experience whatsoever, a smaller hedge fund will probably pay you below what you'd make on the street as a first year analyst. Upside of the buyside is you won't be getting your balls busted for 90 hours/week (hopefully).
As for larger HFs that recruit straight from undergrad, I can't speak to all of them, but it seems like the major ones are more IB-style sweatshops.
Depends on how strong the reputation of your target school is. I've seen a couple of very good HFs that came onto campus to recruit, but the majority of the positions were things that you would have to go out and find for yourself. HFs aren't really looking to hire except for exceptional candidates @ the undergrad level.
The 90+ hours is definitely the exception, from my friends that took those positions, and not the rule.
Unless you are a math/computer science major looking at quant roles, it is next to impossible to get into a HF/AM (at least front office).
Very few top hedge funds recruit at college. The exceptions are quant oriented funds like de shaw, citadel, aqr. And those jobs are VERY tough to get. By and large, funds recruit experienced candidates and/or people from top MBA programs.
Also, Bridgewater is decently easy to get if they recruit on campus.
Is it possible to join a hedge fund out of college? (Originally Posted: 03/26/2010)
Is it possible to join a hedge fund out of college? I know most firms want you to have training already, but are there any that like to train the entry level positions themselves? What is a basic entry level position at a hedge fund?
In order to get a good HF you need to be a top student (3.8+) with very good internships. You also need contacts as most decent HF recruit from Harvard or Wharton undergrad.
Depends, but you could start out as an assistant researcher or maybe a trading assistant (but I think researcher is more common).
larger HFs do take undergrads (and even some interns) but are obviously pretty tough bridgewater, d.e. shaw both do
SAC also does. I know for a fact that they recruit at Wharton; I assume the same is true at Harvard (though I am not certain). I'm not sure about everyone else.
As for D.E Shaw, here is a link to the Employee Profile section of the website:
http://www.deshaw.com/EmployeeProfiles.html
Getting into HF from undergrad -- possible? (Originally Posted: 03/14/2013)
Hey guys, I was wondering if I could get some advice.
I'm on my gap year right now currently doing a boutique AM internship and heading to a top target school in the fall. I know the typical route is IB -> PE/HF but I really want to bypass that completely and go straight to HF after graduation. My plan right now is to leverage my current AM internship to get a more legit PWM internship freshman year, IB internship sophomore and junior year, and try recruiting for HF senior year.
Obviously this is a long shot for me -- but has anyone been able to do this who HASN'T come out of Wharton or ISN'T a Rhodes Scholar (you know how I'm talking about). And seriously, am I reaching too high? And has anyone been able to do this who could give me some tips?
P.S. I'm bored at work so I'm trying to kill some time...
Yes, I did it. I went to a non-target. I'm at work right now, but I'll give you my full background in a private message or an email. If you don't hear from me by tomorrow, send me a message as a reminder.
foreword: Takes place in Canada
I got lucky, I got a "summer internship" out of last year of undergrad, then basically just showed up earlier, left later and worked harder than the other interns and kept showing up after they left and eventually they offered me a full-time job (in december of last year).
Dont have the typical background either.... double degree in engineering and economics with background of summer jobs in finance
For what its worth... its possible in Canada.
We hire undergrads out of the Cal schools but I don't recall any of them ever doing well. Firm has an 80% attrition rate in the first year for analysts (just win baby) and most undergrads get completely blown out. It's possible though and I'm sure some other funds hire out of undergrad as well.
Do you know why they don't do well?
Value -- I'll send you a PM once I get ten banana points (LOL).
Everyone else -- Thanks for the responses.
If you can manage that internship track (at respected establishments) it's possible. The higher you aim, the harder it gets, but a smaller-sized HF would probably accept you if you have great grades and good networking/recommendations.
For the smaller non-artbitrage funds surely, if your a hott chick.I've seen women who worked at funds as summer analyst and FT analyst with PR degrees....
Because business schools don't really teach anything valuable? It's a pretty dynamic environment here without any hand holding. My personal opinion is that while a few years in sell side ER or investment banking is relatively "worthless" in the absolute sense (how valuable is formatting pitch books in IB?), people in those roles pick up some level of self sufficiency and maturity. I'm not saying it's a fantastic use of time, but it makes it easier to transition to a role with more responsibility vs. someone right out of undergrad. It also provides a little real world perspective on how investing / finance basics actually work in real life.
I'm guessing you're talking about Berkeley-Haas? If so, I agree -- talked to some grads who said it was kind of a waste of time, though easy to get good GPA.
So I guess one way to counter that lack of maturity is an extra SA IBD stint?
We've hired out of Berkeley, Stanford, Caltech and some of the 2nd and 3rd tier schools. The only one who didn't suck was a kid out of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo but that was before I was here. Not all of those have undergrad business schools and we've hired non-business people that didn't work out either.
Best profile IMO is 2-4 years out of undergrad, no MBA, possibly CFA, decent experience doing something business related, very hungry (that's why we typically hire smart non-target kids). It helps if they already know a lot about value investing based on self study.
Interesting. Ravenous are you in the bay?
You sound mature and well-informed for your age, but best advice for someone just entering college is to focus on things other than career for the first few years. By all means indulge your interest in investing and recruit when the time comes, but definitely try to explore other career possibilities and avocations. Your recruiting odds (and in my opinion, investing acumen) will quite frankly be stronger if you've developed a broader perspective. Plus, you'll make more friends if you're not overly career-oriented from day one - you've got the rest of your life for that.
Yes sir, I know college isn't just about career. I just think it's nice to have a set of well-established goals, a "plan" if you will, and let things fall as they may. But no, career isn't everything, and I totally understand that sentiment. Thanks for your input.
depends what school you go to. I know bridgewater recruits at Dartmouth and Princeton
Yes, in the Bay.
Bump!
It's what i'm aiming for (probably unrealistic)
Bridgewater, GS SSG&GSIP hire out of undergrad, I am sure there are other well known names that do as well.
Yes it is possible. Not as common, but possible. I have seen more people make the start with places like Fidelity out of Harvard and frankly I think those kids do better in the long run given a more structured program. I agree with Ravenous, a lot of those kids that start out at a HF burn out quickly, mostly due to lack of direction. Try to enter one that has a more structured program.
Definitely possible at a smaller/unknown HF but why would you do it? Only way I would do HF straight out of undergrad is if it was comparable to a place I would end up after 6-10 months of banking. As stated before, Bridgewater, GS SSG/GSIP hire out of undergrad which I would definitely take over IB. Citadel also hires undergrads. Otherwise, why not just suck it up at GS/MS for a few months then jump to a Baupost/Eton Park?
HF out of CMU undergrad? (Originally Posted: 11/25/2012)
Hey guys, pretty simple question.
Do you think I could get into an HF out of CMU undergrad? If you don't know, CMU's curriculum is highly quantitative focused. I just want to know if it would be possible to network into an HF.
Thanks
yes
That all depends whether you mean carnegie mellon or central michigan
You are wasting your time asking this question. Just go out and network, you should know the answer to the question and if you don't you are incredibly ill informed.
Anything is possible if you network well.
Is this CS?
Yes, but probably as a developer.
Yes, with effective networking.
Depends is the key word here. Most HF's are so small that you pretty much need to know someone to break in, and the school you go to is less relevant for a lot of what you might call "middle markets" who don't formally recruit except for obviously factoring there being more harvard/wharton alum out there working in them. I go to a non target and was told that school background isn't a big deal by 1 HF - and they had lots of ivy grads too. CMU (whether it's carnegie or central mich lol) won't hurt you as it might for BB ER/alternative investments or other similar type jobs, but as everyone has stated - you need to work hard at learning more about the industry itself, investing and then network and hit the pavement to actually get the job.
Just to clear it up it's Carnegie Mellon haha. Ok. If most people who go into IB want to jump to an HF after 2 years, then it makes sense just to go straight to one, no? Also, what are the position progression at an HF (Like for IB it's analyst, associate etc.)?
I agree with you that you should try to go HF right away instead of doin IB if possible. Buy like it is mentioned above, most shops are small and don't have recruiting programs that are formal in recruiting undergrads. This is why people do IB, with OCR and people in undergrad are still relatively connected to those recent graduates who were top in their classes to go to IB.
If you skip IB/sell side and go straight into a HF - don't you limit your options for the down road? (MBA or a bigger/better HF)
Wouldn't it make sense for a bigger HF to want someone with HF experience vs. an IB analyst with no REAL HF training?
How to land a HF job after college? (Originally Posted: 08/01/2008)
Hello. I'm a rising senior and want to go to a decent hedge fund after graduation, preferably something that's known. I'm really interested in long-short so I will be applying to some internal prop funds at bulge brackets, but I want to also apply to non-quant funds as well (aka no RenTech, JSC).
Is it possible for undergrads to find these jobs if they don't recruit at the school? I go to an ivy league but still, most hedge funds do not recruit and I'm wondering if there's anything I can do besides e-mail a resume and cross my fingers.
Also, I come from a trading background, not from IBD. I didn't receive an offer from my group. They liked me, but unfortunately there wasn't enough space. How will my lack of offers affect their perception? Thanks.
I would work through alumni from your school that are working at hedge funds. I'm sure if you go to an ivey there are alumni working at well known hedge funds. If you had a good trading internship they may be interested.
As far as not getting an offer, just explain what you posted on this forum, that there wasn't space. Maybe you could get a letter of recommendation from your previous employer.
www.sharpeinvesting.com
Possible to work in HF right out of college? (Originally Posted: 02/25/2013)
I'm an undergrand senior and looking to get into the hedge fund industry. Econ major, many quantitative classes, high GPA, a couple finance-related extra curriculars. I want a job with upward mobility, and I'm not so sure that client services or operations, where it might be easier to get a job, would provide that. Is this possible to get a job as an analyst, or in research or trading, without a finance degree or experience in banking? If so, what kind of funds would be my best bet?
The quant hedge funds such as citadel, de shaw, two sigma, aqr, do hire undergrads. The fundamental research ones require relevant experience in BB, PE, HF. Oh, bridgewater also hires undergrads for its investment associate role.
I'm interviewing at a megafund (think Bridgewater, Greenlight, Paulson & Co.) and other middle market HF's right now as my first job coming out of a non-target.
I interviewed with two start-up hedge funds (one volatility trading, the other, value investing), both landed through cold-calling, with a non-target humanities major, and I was interviewing from a different country.
Ask yourself the following questions:
1) Do I want to trade or invest?
2) How long can I talk about the markets fluently?
3) Do I have any ideas that can make money? Do I have enough conviction in these ideas such that I am using my own money?
4) Do I have access to a database of recently launched hedge funds?
5) How much in common do I really have with these hedge fund managers?
It's definitely possible, but based on my experiences, and what other people on this board have written... it takes work.
[quote=Culcet]I interviewed with two start-up hedge funds (one volatility trading, the other, value investing), both landed through cold-calling, with a non-target humanities major, and I was interviewing from a different country.
When you made calls, what was your strategy?
It's definitely possible. It just takes a lot of persistence
2 years of IBD REALLY necessary for HF analyst position? (Originally Posted: 08/17/2014)
Is 2 years of IBD experience really necessary for the 'training' (I'm skeptical), or do some hedge funds hire analysts out of undergrad? If so, which ones?
Some do - hard to say which. HF recruiting is much more ad hoc than PE/IB etc. Have to do some searching to find some that would recruit straight out of UG - and most will only do so from target schools.
Silverpoint and DE Shaw are just 2. I'm from a non-target, stellar resume, really good internships, wasn't even considered for a phone screen.
preference goes to wharton, not even all ivys. they can be that picky. better to go the Headhunter route.
Saying that those HFs dont even look at non targets because you didnt get an interview is wrong (and also makes you look quite arrogant).
If you are a full-time analyst, nobody cares about your internships
not a ft analyst... i was interviewing for hf ft
It's easier to land a HF position after working as an IB analyst for 2 years than coming straight from undergrad since you have skills that most firm's require (e.g. modeling, accounting), but recruiting is much more ad hoc than PE. If you network and show a true passion for the markets and the ability to articulate a thesis then you could break in without going into a 2 year program first. This is probably more accurate for smaller firms that don't have formal recruiting classes (at least it has been in my experiences).
Sankaty Silver Point Bridgewater Citadel
Don't listen to anyone giving you bs about not being able to get an interview. I have gotten an interview from all of these funds from a non-target school either for the SA program or the FT program (Silver Point just started the process for FT and Sankaty is figuring it out in the next few days I am aware dont worry). You just have to grind, intern in the industry every semester while you are at school, have fantastic sophomore and junior year internships (GS at a top group certainly helps), get the offer after junior yr summer, and shop it as fast as possible. These shops are absolutely selective, and it can be more straightforward to get in after 2 years at a bank.
I will probably end up signing with GS given my school's exploding date offer, but good luck.
OP, have you done any research regarding type of fund you'd like to join?
There are pretty much no single manager traditional L/S funds that hire out of undergrad on a structured basis. The firms listed above will have vastly different investing styles and working experiences. If you're just trying to interview at any firm that looks at undergrads, I'd suggest you go the banking route and take some time to actually figure out what kinds of funds you are interested in.
The easiest way to get an FT analyst position at an HF right out of undergrad is through an internship at the HF -- it's how I got my FT HF analyst position out of undergrad. Expectations/responsibilities are lower for interns, so you can typically do some good work, but you need to be lucky enough to 1) get a front office role, 2) have a manager with hiring power and 3) firm and dept PnL are not suffering. Overall it's a risky bet if you aim for this during your junior summer as you'd be giving up the safer IBD route.
What options did you weight when choosing between an IB and HF internship Junior year? I'm trying to make that decision for summer 2015.
No, it is not necessary. It may be necessary to get an interview at certain hedge funds for certain analyst-type jobs but there are many ways into the hedge fund industry and many ways to the higher levels of the industry once you are in it and most do not require a banking stint.
I actually helped out with recruiting for my group at a large hedge fund summer. PMs request banking resumes SOLELY because they can't find talent anywhere else. Even then, they feel like bankers bullshit way too much, just marginally less than consultants.
On the whole, HFs are more and more open to hiring kids out of college. Of the list of top 10 HFs, probably 5 of them hire straight out. If they hire at all.
Can't find or don't want to look because there is a difference. They are probably looking in the wrong places.
I would say 1+ years is nearly necessary. You simply won't have the proper training under a year, and it might still be questionable after 2 years. Modelling skills, understanding the deals/job doesn't come quick and takes that amount of time.
You'd have a good chance of landing an offer at a smaller shop (less than $1b aum) if you interned there. But no way they'd hire you otherwise without IB experience
My 2 cents. A larger fund will typically have an undergrad recruitment channel. Usually taking on kids with 1 or 2 summer internships @ at BB or elite boutique.
Outside of that, from what I've seen it's all ex-bankers, though 1 year of experience can work (one of the analysts above me @ a BB left after one year to join SAC back in 2011).
This is for long/shorts, events, and credit. I can't speak for macro or algo funds.
can anyone speak about macro funds (non quant type)? don't think algo would be the ib type of background.
Plenty of analysts make the jump to HF's before their two year program is up.
Hell, if my class was any example, I'd say the majority of those who truly wanted to do HF (real passion for the markets, people who wouldn't even consider doing KKR vs. a Farallon) actually all left before the two years, with a good chunk leaving before their one year anniversary at the firm. HF's really only use banking resumes, as it provides a reliable source of talent, and its too time consuming for funds (and recruiters for that matter) to do broader search processes.
So long way of saying, by no means is 2 years of IBD a prerequisite to land a gid, but its damn near impossible to say that having GS/MS on your resume doesn't boost your shot of getting a spot at a HF by leaps and bounds.
In a somewhat related note - I just started my IBD gig (after two years of middle office work) and I'm in a modeling-oriented sponsors group at a BB. I'm starting to think I can't possibly do 2 full years here BC I feel behind the game already.. I would prefer working at a HF, but obviously makes more sense to do PE next - would it be possible to jump to a solid MM shop after only a year here? If so, how do I go about it? Thanks in advance.
I know a guy who went to Citadel straight out of UG...but he also had some great internships. If you can at least have that under your belt, you obviously have a better chance.
Basically - does it help? Sure. Is it absolutely required? No. But you better be damn good if you don't have it.
I don't think Citadel is relevant to the current discussion, as their undergrad hires are all of the quant variety, thereby competing more with Facebook/Google than GS/MS IBD.
If you're interested in fundamental investing [as opposed to quant] there are very few opportunities out of undergrad at large, well-regarded funds. Silver Point is as far as I know probably the best fund with an established, formal program for hiring interns & FT. Outside of this there are a few others, such as Sankaty, but personally I've heard quite bad things about the experience there.
The advice I have gotten is to avoid these opportunities if you can land a position at a bank/group with excellent HF recruiting. Granted, there are only a handful of groups that fall into that category. But if you can land such a position, you will have a much wider range of opportunities when post-banking recruiting rolls around. It's kind of a supply/demand thing; the supply of HF opportunities out of undergrad is very low, so you are more likely to have to compromise where you end up [i.e. go to a place like SP even if you aren't sure you want to be a distressed investor] just to land a position. If you go IBD and wait two years, it's more likely you will end up somewhere that's a "fit."
This exactly. Although again with the supply/demand, the number of IBD groups with a broad array of HF opportunities is miniscule (~5) which is why you often see IBD -> PE -> HF or IBD -> PE -> MBA -> HF
Well another reason is the fact that PE recruiting is extremely structured and fast. You get multiple offers early on in your first year as a banker at BBs/elites and almost all of these PE offers are exploding. You also get these offers very quickly as the turnaround for the 2-3 rounds is extremely fast due to the fact that all the PE firms are tripping over themselves to get the best analysts.
HF interviews on the other hand, come up as spots open 1 by 1 and there can be 4-8 rounds over a span of months. This doesn't usually fit with the usual timeline for temporary 2 year positions. It's the same reason some of my MBA buddies are finding it easier to get PE internships than HF internships.
But the main point is yes, there are obviously fewer HF seats so it's more likely to get one of the dozens of PE interviews most bankers get with 2-4 analyst spots than the handful of single spot HF interviews.
Broadly true when looking at the entire universe of funds but there are many that follow roughly the same schedule as PE recruiting, at least in years where they are looking for analyst(s).
It's extremely hard and rarely done because of the reasons outlined above
Do Hedge Funds recruit at UG (Originally Posted: 04/26/2011)
Im about to make my decision on which college to attend. Im choosing between Columbia, Dartmouth and Stanford. I like all 3 equally and this will probably tell me which school to attend. Do HF's recruit at these schools? If so, which school do they recruit at more? My current plan was to do UG--->IB--->HF/PE/VC but if I can skip IB, I'll probably do that(not that I dislike IB).
How do you know if you like/dislike IB? You're 18. I don't care if you read WSJ every day, have been investing your bar mitzvah money for 5 years and made a 345% return, or if your dad's an MD at Goldman, you don't know anything about anything at this point (I'm saying this in a nice way).
All 3 are great schools with pros and cons. Yes, if you do well at any of those you can get a good finance job. Hedge fund recruiting at the UG level is rare to my knowledge, but not impossible/unheard of. I'd venture a guess and say some of the quant-y HFs hire out of UG, so if you're in engineering/comp sci at Stanford or Columbia you'll be best-positioned. Otherwise, very tough, and you may have to tough it out in IB for 2 years like the rest of us.
I know for a fact that quant funds recruit out of Columbia and Stanford, not sure about Dartmouth, but I assume so. This is a terrible thing to base your choice on. You should be choosing Stanford for any number of other reasons ;)
yeah, I know I know nothing about IB but when I said that I liked it, I meant that I have a reason why I want to do it, other than money. I've heard alot on this site that when a deal you've been working on gets done, its feels as good as fucking a model. Also, I'm not jewish.
I would say if you want finance, go to Columbia because you can do an internship while in school. the location of this school gives you a tremendous advantage relative to Stanford or Dartmouth, assuming your ultimate goal is to end up in finance. The location can also give you a huge advantage when it comes to summer or full time recruiting. I am speaking from experience where, hf's and bb's were a subway stop away for me while at school
Go to Stanford... Northeast winters blow and Pac-10 football is much better than most Ivy sports
Have a buddy that majored in history at Stanford and got hired by a HF in Greenwich. Kid is pure talent. Not much help, i know, but cool story nonetheless.
Yeah forgot to add - Stanford
Columbia, from experience (my roommate) got recruited right out of ugrad to a HF...and worked there for 2 years while he finished school, close proximity is an advantage.
Stanford is the obvious choice here. It's a superior school in every way, and the location and campus is sick. Of course columbia's location does make finance recruiting easier in the sense that firms will visit more often, and you can easily schedule networking events and interviews. However, if you do well at Stanford, especially in a quantitative major, there will be no finance opportunities that a Columbia student will have, which also won't be available to you.
There aren't many places better to come from than Stanford. Harvard is one, Princeton is arguably another. Take Stanford.
Thanks guys. Do you guys know if Yale is a target? Better than Stanford? Im just weighing my options and trying to see what will be the best fit. The only reason why I'm A BIT hesitant to pick Stanford as a no brainer is because of location. My family is in NYC and are all expecting me to pick Columbia as they've never heard of Stanford(im the 1st to go to college) and are only aware of the great reps of Harvard and Columbia. They want me to stay close to home.
Yale is not as big in finance, I'd personally go with stanford but columbia will also give you opportunities.
Stanford.
1) Better weather--need I say more? 2) Better reputation--of those three, Stanford is the only school spoken of in the same breath as Harvard/Yale/Princeotn/Oxbridge 3) Better academics in just about everything
Columbia will give you the opportunity to work for more opportunities. Stanford will give you the opportunity to have opportunities handed to you.
You also have to be sure you like the school. If you don't like the place, that's the only reason I'd tell you not to go there. Other than that, wtf are you waiting for? SlyGuy hit it dead on with #2.
I was choosing between Dartmouth, Stanford, and a few other at this time last year. By my username, you can tell which one I picked.
I think if you're going to major in something really quantitative like math or CS and have an interest in going into prop trading, Stanford is your best bet. Dartmouth gets some prop trading attention - Jane Street and DRW - but Stanford gets all of them, including the likes of GETCO and Jump Trading.
If you're not quantitatively oriented, I'm not sure Stanford is necessarily better than Dartmouth or Columbia. I know DE Shaw, AQR, Millennium Management (only a few times - when they had openings), Sankaty, Bridgewater, etc. all recruit pretty regularly at Dartmouth. We also get Bain and BX PE, as well as some MM PE firms, on campus recruiting every year too.
It's a difficult decision, but I agree with the posters above who said that recruiting should not dictate your decision. Good luck.
What HF's recruit out of UG? (Originally Posted: 09/28/2011)
What HF's recruit at Wharton, Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Columbia, and Cornell(LoL) for their junior positions? I've searched and found a few but im sure some has changed and would like to be up-to-date.
Soros Fund Management recruited a guy from Stern straight out of undergrad.
There is a current junior at stern who did an off-cycle internship with soros during his sophomore year. No idea how he pulled it off. Also, a yale undergrad who graduated in 2009 landed a job at Paulson straight out of school and is now an associate there. Again, I have no idea how he got that gig.
But aside from these anomalies, the hedge funds that recruit at top colleges are usually the quant funds like citadel, de shaw, AQR. Those don't require previous work experience in banking, trading, or research. They just want super bright kids who majored in a quant subject. The exception to this is bridgewater, which recruits plenty of liberal arts grads.
Cornell (LoL)?... aren't you still in high school and you're dogging on a school that you're not even sure you could get in?
I hope you end up going to THE Ohio State University
What he said.
I'd love to go there. Great Football, girls, none of those rich snobs. Loosen up, I was Jking. I'd love to go to Cornell and study agriculture or learn how to run a hotel. I'm not one of those guys who view Cornell as a public school, I'd love to go there and respect everything the institution stands for.
I go to Ohio what is wrong with it?
^ He goes to UMich so I can see why he said that. I think he's mad the sports at OSU are better.
Hey!
We still got hockey...
lol i go to princeton don't ever affiliate me with non target ppl i mastered what they teach in pre-skool
lol. Can you chance me for HYPSMW+ Duke, Williams and UT? Serious question, what are the eating clubs and how exclusive is it? I know that may sound dumb but I'm unsure.
:( Cuny students these days...
I know of a guy at Silver Point that was recruited there straight out of the big H. All other cases I know are super smart comp sci and math kids being recruited at DE Shaw/Citadel.
The vast majority of these people got those gigs out of undergrad due to major connections.
^Yeah, but he's a completely unique case.
Big guys with structured undergraduate hiring programs? (Originally Posted: 10/01/2011)
Other than Bridgewater, no other hedge funds seem to be recruiting on campus. The other day, a headhunter randomly contacted me via LNKD, despite the fact that I'm still in school (co '12). Got me thinking... if I'm interested in going the hedge fund route, who should I be targeting?
Eos blanditiis vel repellendus quia. Eum reprehenderit ducimus esse vel. Modi dolor alias minima sit et. Ipsam ipsam voluptate veniam exercitationem quidem ea numquam. Qui aut et esse temporibus itaque voluptate. Beatae pariatur dicta ut nihil fugiat enim minus. Ex quidem voluptas voluptas et vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Est repudiandae recusandae dolores sed cupiditate. Eligendi voluptatem et veritatis cum qui minima velit vitae. Quidem velit culpa facere eos hic distinctio numquam. Dolores dolor est et et quia quo harum. Autem repellendus aut laboriosam velit repudiandae dolorum. Nihil at tempora omnis illo et eius. Aut quasi qui quia excepturi placeat.
Minima sunt minima commodi qui perspiciatis. Debitis sint amet quia quas modi est.
Aut quos quo quibusdam voluptas sapiente vitae. Nulla voluptas enim ipsam porro. Quia sequi quia repudiandae sint placeat voluptatibus ut. Quae sunt ea delectus officiis. In a praesentium reprehenderit iure velit. Quibusdam aspernatur rem quia sint et tenetur impedit.
Dolor ut eligendi illo. Expedita ut rerum omnis aut aut nobis. Vero voluptatem dolorem numquam excepturi quis. Odit placeat voluptate provident repellat et nemo optio.
Non dolores corrupti vel laborum delectus quo non. Aliquam fugiat omnis unde voluptatem neque ut. Necessitatibus vero excepturi quo. Rerum magnam modi occaecati aut vero dolor et. Quos rerum architecto molestias est perferendis dolorem.
Quis magnam totam nihil magni dolores aliquam possimus. Aut blanditiis eum cumque non.
Assumenda expedita nisi et nihil vel. Eius non ab fugiat sunt. Earum ea voluptates architecto voluptas eveniet magnam.
Quo cupiditate voluptatem sed reprehenderit adipisci deleniti ullam. Sit enim totam ex voluptates. Sequi aut voluptatem nam vel et veniam. Non reiciendis quia quos quos quo.
Voluptas beatae repudiandae sit ut reprehenderit. Corrupti et vel eveniet possimus optio reprehenderit. Voluptas atque laudantium fugiat ratione. Esse labore consequuntur reprehenderit sed quaerat fuga corporis est. Corporis laudantium nihil doloremque voluptas voluptatem ea tempore. Perspiciatis rem quia dolorum placeat similique. Omnis hic debitis eligendi optio qui.
Dignissimos voluptas suscipit eius voluptas porro beatae ea. Blanditiis maxime quam nostrum harum ducimus eius autem. Cumque nulla repellendus sunt recusandae at sed. Est dolorum odit ipsa suscipit ut non. Architecto adipisci nulla quis impedit quas sint.
Repellendus aliquam vel voluptate suscipit. Voluptas non harum ipsa quos ratione voluptatem. Sit maxime perspiciatis nobis incidunt ullam consectetur. Et eum sunt sint expedita molestiae quae. Modi repudiandae quisquam est sed adipisci reiciendis. Eligendi voluptas quis in. Debitis optio cumque veritatis voluptate consequuntur vitae illum.
Totam saepe atque sed corrupti. Quae fugiat nulla maiores blanditiis maiores occaecati distinctio.
Ut eligendi ratione sunt cupiditate. Sapiente recusandae officia blanditiis dicta nisi. Sit id molestias sit explicabo tempore nobis. Ullam repudiandae vel qui beatae. Maiores eaque illum corrupti commodi tempora.
In sunt possimus natus possimus. Earum optio nostrum facilis sit doloremque laborum. Quibusdam sed commodi dolores dolor dignissimos.
Explicabo quo adipisci dolore dolores. Et quia ut atque eligendi aliquam. Commodi ea deserunt consequatur nulla. Voluptas et labore maiores eum voluptate.