• Sharebar

Anyone know the placement for analysts at perella weinberg for this year or past years? Please answer if you actually know rather than guess.

Comments (23)

  • guts's picture

    business school for quite a few

  • In reply to guts
    Brady4MVP's picture

    guts wrote:
    business school for quite a few

    If you have perella weinberg on your resume, you're pretty much guaranteed to get into harvard, stanford, or wharton.

  • Don Corleone's picture

    Im @ a pe fund (aum 20b+) and ppl around here - including me - have lot of respect for perella boys

  • firefighter's picture

    If you have perella weinberg on your resume, you're pretty much guaranteed to get into harvard, stanford, or wharton --> is it because its that good or more because its so selective that those kids were gonna get into harvard/stanford anyway?

  • ryancoon1's picture

    Where would you place for PWP compared to GS/MS/C/Barcap/UBS/DB? Also anyone know some other PE funds for placement?

  • In reply to ryancoon1
    no homo's picture

    ryancoon1 wrote:
    Where would you place for PWP compared to GS/MS/C/Barcap/UBS/DB? Also anyone know some other PE funds for placement?

    I wouldn't put it above Goldman or Morgan Stanley, but if you like the smaller environment and may be interested in doing banking long-term, you could take PWP over C, BarCap, UBS or DB without any major qualm.

  • drexelalum11's picture

    Perella guys tend to prefer staying in banking or going to b-school to going to the buyside. Agree with the previous comments about great b-school placement, and those who do want to go to PE do quite well.

  • ShawnFire's picture
  • manuarsenal's picture

    How would perella compare in the boutiques? I would rank it below BX and lazard and almost on par with Evercore ? It would definitely be above Greenhill. It is also very exclusive so that helps in exit opps. In terms of comparison with BB, almost on par with CS but below GS and MS naturally.

  • drexelalum11's picture

    I would rank those banks like this:

    BX=decent
    Lazard=also decent
    Evercore=also decent
    Greenhill=also decent
    CS=also decent
    MS=also decent
    GS=also decent

    If you can't figure out where Perella ranks in that hierarchy, you don't belong in banking.

  • firefighter's picture

    How would perella compare in the boutiques? I would rank it below BX and lazard and almost on par with Evercore ? It would definitely be above Greenhill. It is also very exclusive so that helps in exit opps. In terms of comparison with BB, almost on par with CS but below GS and MS naturally.
    --> Are Evercore and Greenhill that different?

  • manuarsenal's picture

    Drexel alum will you mind explaining that hierarchy in more detail ?

  • drexelalum11's picture

    Of course. I rank banks using a very sophisticated algorithm based on the following:

    Y = 0.25α + .385μ + 24.5ε + .084θ + ο*α/5.67043 + π^2 + γ + .000560β * λ + .0045ω

    Where:

    α is current US M&A league table position for transactions above $545m, below $3.45bn, announced not withdrawn, previous thirteen months, by volume
    μ is global sell-side league table position for media transactions from 2007-2008, announced not withdrawn, above $46m, by volume
    ε is number of analysts in the 2009 incoming class
    θ is the number of analysts from the 2007 incoming class who have been laid off
    ο is the number of associates in the incoming 2010 class from HBS plus the number from Booth times 1.45
    π is (approximately) 3.14159265
    γ is the number of analysts at the bank divided by the number of secretaries, less the banks distance from the wall street bull in bars of gold, times the current level of the DJII, plus 2
    β is the bank's beta verse the relevant local index (estimated for partnerships)
    ω is the number of former employees currently serving in the US treasury

    Based on this algorithm, all of the banks you queried about are decent.

  • Ricqles's picture
  • T_I_M's picture

    What are the values for Y that you use to determine "decent" and the other rankings (also decent, somewhat decent, etc.)? I've plugged the numbers into the equation and it appears legit depending on the intervals for "Y."

  • ryancoon1's picture

    How would you compare the exit ops for Perella vs. Greenhill/evercore or generalist offers from bottom half of the bulge brackets?

  • drexelalum11's picture

    Also decent is the same ranking as decent. The rankings are pretty simple: "decent" and "not decent." If you've plugged in the variables, you should be able to back-solve for what the decent range is. For reference, Piper Jaffray is the median value for "not decent"

  • Don Corleone's picture

    this is my 2nd post and I repeat : Perella is The Shit.

    Fuck evercore.
    Fuck greenhill.
    Fuck lazard.

  • finalfantasy's picture

    To unlock this content for free, please login / register below.

    Sign In with Facebook Sign In with Google

    Connecting helps us build a vibrant community. We'll never share your info without your permission. Sign up with email or if you are already a member, login here Bonus: Also get 6 free financial modeling lessons for free ($200+ value) when you register!
  • manuarsenal's picture