Perella Weinberg Exit Ops
IB
Tags:
(Chimp, 13
Points)
on 10/4/10 at 11:23am
Anyone know the placement for analysts at perella weinberg for this year or past years? Please answer if you actually know rather than guess.





business school for quite a
business school for quite a few
guts wrote: business school
business school for quite a few
If you have perella weinberg on your resume, you're pretty much guaranteed to get into harvard, stanford, or wharton.
Im @ a pe fund (aum 20b+) and
Im @ a pe fund (aum 20b+) and ppl around here - including me - have lot of respect for perella boys
If you have perella weinberg
If you have perella weinberg on your resume, you're pretty much guaranteed to get into harvard, stanford, or wharton --> is it because its that good or more because its so selective that those kids were gonna get into harvard/stanford anyway?
Where would you place for PWP
Where would you place for PWP compared to GS/MS/C/Barcap/UBS/DB? Also anyone know some other PE funds for placement?
ryancoon1 wrote: Where would
Where would you place for PWP compared to GS/MS/C/Barcap/UBS/DB? Also anyone know some other PE funds for placement?
I wouldn't put it above Goldman or Morgan Stanley, but if you like the smaller environment and may be interested in doing banking long-term, you could take PWP over C, BarCap, UBS or DB without any major qualm.
Perella guys tend to prefer
Perella guys tend to prefer staying in banking or going to b-school to going to the buyside. Agree with the previous comments about great b-school placement, and those who do want to go to PE do quite well.
Modeling Training
Finance Interviews Guide
Resume Review
Would you take it over CS?
Would you take it over CS?
How would perella compare in
How would perella compare in the boutiques? I would rank it below BX and lazard and almost on par with Evercore ? It would definitely be above Greenhill. It is also very exclusive so that helps in exit opps. In terms of comparison with BB, almost on par with CS but below GS and MS naturally.
I would rank those banks like
I would rank those banks like this:
BX=decent
Lazard=also decent
Evercore=also decent
Greenhill=also decent
CS=also decent
MS=also decent
GS=also decent
If you can't figure out where Perella ranks in that hierarchy, you don't belong in banking.
Modeling Training
Finance Interviews Guide
Resume Review
How would perella compare in
How would perella compare in the boutiques? I would rank it below BX and lazard and almost on par with Evercore ? It would definitely be above Greenhill. It is also very exclusive so that helps in exit opps. In terms of comparison with BB, almost on par with CS but below GS and MS naturally.
--> Are Evercore and Greenhill that different?
Drexel alum will you mind
Drexel alum will you mind explaining that hierarchy in more detail ?
Of course. I rank banks
Of course. I rank banks using a very sophisticated algorithm based on the following:
Y = 0.25α + .385μ + 24.5ε + .084θ + ο*α/5.67043 + π^2 + γ + .000560β * λ + .0045ω
Where:
α is current US M&A league table position for transactions above $545m, below $3.45bn, announced not withdrawn, previous thirteen months, by volume
μ is global sell-side league table position for media transactions from 2007-2008, announced not withdrawn, above $46m, by volume
ε is number of analysts in the 2009 incoming class
θ is the number of analysts from the 2007 incoming class who have been laid off
ο is the number of associates in the incoming 2010 class from HBS plus the number from Booth times 1.45
π is (approximately) 3.14159265
γ is the number of analysts at the bank divided by the number of secretaries, less the banks distance from the wall street bull in bars of gold, times the current level of the DJII, plus 2
β is the bank's beta verse the relevant local index (estimated for partnerships)
ω is the number of former employees currently serving in the US treasury
Based on this algorithm, all of the banks you queried about are decent.
Modeling Training
Finance Interviews Guide
Resume Review
LOL
LOL
What are the values for Y
What are the values for Y that you use to determine "decent" and the other rankings (also decent, somewhat decent, etc.)? I've plugged the numbers into the equation and it appears legit depending on the intervals for "Y."
How would you compare the
Also decent is the same
Modeling Training
Finance Interviews Guide
Resume Review
this is my 2nd post and I
sad trolling in this thread
drexelalum11 wrote: Of
Does anyone have info on
drexelalum11 wrote: Of
Don Corleone wrote: this is