Demystifying the CPA Exam and Designation
There’s been a couple of threads that have popped up lately about the CPA exam and whether it would be worth it for the authors try and pass it in lieu of other things, or in their spare time. Some of the comments by other posters lead me to believe there’s a lot of misinformation or misconceptions about what a CPA actually is. I think it would be helpful to put some information out there to refer to later, as I feel these misconceptions might lead people away from the best path to achieving their goals.
This post is a mixture of my personal experiences as well as a lot of research on the subject, but seeing as there are other accountants/CPAs on this forum, I should note that this is based on my own personal view, and as such might differ from other posters’ opinions.
So here we go
1. Passing the CPA exam makes me a CPA.
No. When people usually refer to a CPA (as an individual) they are referring to someone who is licensed by their state board of accountancy as a certified public accountant. While they do have to pass the CPA exam, there are other requirements that you have to meet in order to be a CPA. The main one that many outside of public accounting have issues meeting is the experience requirement, which is generally 1 or 2 years under the supervision of another CPA. If you’re going into investment banking, a hedge fund, private equity, or other front office finance roles, the chance that you’ll be working under another licensed CPA is remote, hence why it’s pretty much pointless to try and become a licensed CPA in those roles. And just like the CFA designation, just because you've passed the CPA exam does not mean you can go around calling yourself a CPA. That’s a big no-no.
2. Passing the CPA exam shows that I’m good at accounting.
Not necessarily. The CPA exam covers a HELL of a lot of information, and most of it not financial accounting related.
The CPA exam is broken into four parts: REG, BEC, AUD, and FAR. Out of these, the only ones that are semi-relevant for finance positions are BEC and FAR. REG covers taxation and business law, both of those you’ll probably leave to your firm’s own lawyers and tax accountants. AUD covers how to audit financial statements, which seems like it might be helpful, but only covers things like sampling a population or what materiality is. Again, this role will be left to your firm’s internal and external auditors.
BEC covers a hodge-podge of topics, including economics, finance, and information systems. If you did well in your econ and finance courses, you’re not going to gain any additional knowledge from this test. FAR, which covers all the financial accounting (including governmental and non-profit accounting), covers so much material that it’s all basic high level stuff. If you did well in your intermediate financial accounting courses, you’re not going to learn any more studying for this test.
If anything, the only real thing passing the CPA exam shows is that you’re good at absorbing a ton of information and then taking tests on it. Having studied for the CFA exam, I would say that the Level 1 exam is 10x harder than anything the CPA exam puts out, so if you’re looking to take a test, take that one.
3. Should I take the CPA exam to learn about accounting?
This is where I interject my personal opinion, so take it with a grain of salt. As noted earlier, only about two-thirds of one out of the four sections of the CPA exam covers financial accounting. None of it is new or more complex than what’s covered in a financial accounting class. But if you have no accounting experience what-so-ever, would it be worth it to take it? I’m going to say no.
If you've taken an introductory accounting class, you've learned enough of the basics where it would be worth your time to pick up a book on, say, financial statement analysis or the CFA study material on the topic than it would to study the financial accounting included in FAR. This is mainly because 1) FAR doesn't teach you how to put all the puzzle pieces together, and 2) a lot of the technical financial accounting is useless in your job (i.e. proper journal entries). That being said, building a better understanding of accounting can’t hurt you either.
If you have absolutely no accounting experience at all, you’d be better off taking a couple classes and then picking up a financial statement analysis book.
4. Getting the CPA designation is essential to move up in finance positions.
In IB/HF/PE type roles, definitely not. In private industry roles such as CFO, Controller, etc., not necessarily. As I pointed out in another thread, you definitely don’t need to be a CPA to be a CFO, and the goes for other finance and accounting-type roles as well. However, there are definitely a lot of CPAs and former CPAs in these roles. Why? Because a lot of them jump ship from public accounting into these roles, and were CPAs before becoming controllers, FP&A analysts, etc.
What a lot of people seem to equate is that someone who is a CPA is good at financial accounting, which is not always true. I work in Tax at a Big 4 firm, and I’ll have my CPA license in about 2 months. 98% of the time, my work doesn't deal with financial statements. So why then would I be good at analyzing them? Answer: I wouldn't be. Now, an auditor at a Big 4 who is also a CPA probably has a ton more experience than I do in that department, and would be better suited for that role. But if you’re just looking for “CPA” on a resume, there’s no way to tell.
Once a person is an accounting or finance-type role at a company, then it’s also pointless for them to continue to be licensed CPAs. That’s because the “P” in CPA stands for Public, which goes completely unnoticed by most people outside of public accounting. If you’re providing attest work for public companies (i.e. auditing) as Big 4 accountants do, you have to be a CPA to sign off on stuff like tax returns or audit opinions. There’s no rule or law that I’m aware of, though, that requires someone working at a company to be a CPA to do internal finance and accounting-type work.
That being said, there’s a lot of public perception about CPAs. CPA = accountants, CPAs are (generally) trustworthy, CPAs are good at math/accounting, the list goes on. Former CPA/Big 4 accountants also like to hire CPAs/Big 4 accountants because of the standard they represent. That why a lot of accounting-related roles in private companies are littered with CPAs and former Big 4 accountants.
So if you’re thinking you want to be a CFO down the line, I personally think it’s more important to have relevant experience in the industry/role than it is to be a CPA. Not being a CPA is not going to stop you from being a CFO.
In short, becoming a licensed CPA can help you if you moving to an accounting-type role, if you have some relevant experience to back it up. But just passing the CPA will not give you a leg up against other candidates, especially if some of those candidates ARE licensed CPAs and have public accounting experience.
Illum quas rem quis. Dicta ut reprehenderit dolorem reiciendis voluptatem quas id. Quos laboriosam vero ullam ea numquam error sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Beatae ut velit placeat nemo et. Maxime omnis et quia veritatis rerum. Quis beatae incidunt rerum.
Et nesciunt omnis sed sunt modi in nihil. Autem porro quis et molestias at aperiam ut. Qui maxime beatae ut debitis rerum non. Natus iusto aliquid aut rerum tempore praesentium. Quis sed voluptatem ab aut nostrum eum culpa.
Dolorem officia sequi est quia ut atque sit. Officiis consectetur et nemo adipisci. Possimus quisquam magnam non quod nesciunt et soluta non. Omnis provident totam commodi voluptas qui officiis laborum. Non quaerat qui id impedit vel. Esse commodi est cum enim tenetur non rerum.
Eum non perspiciatis culpa odio totam dolores rem. Voluptate odio velit voluptas labore nobis dolores est. Laudantium veritatis numquam provident repellat officia illum qui. Sed ducimus repellat ut sit ut vel beatae. Dolorem voluptas quia eligendi aut rerum. Quis iure laudantium et minima recusandae.
Excepturi est tenetur animi iure. Laudantium atque quos occaecati totam praesentium velit. Voluptatibus id ducimus ut asperiores rerum commodi.
Exercitationem libero architecto odio cumque. Illo accusantium est molestiae.
Sint eum ut eveniet dolores commodi. Corrupti tenetur eos dignissimos labore velit eum. Accusamus nulla cum laudantium aliquid. Soluta eligendi in sapiente quae. Quo rem eum quis enim.
Voluptatem ut occaecati unde id iste. Eos temporibus officia numquam voluptatem. Quo quam voluptate aperiam et.
Quasi sint aliquid aliquam molestias distinctio quibusdam dolorum. Quis quia quod aspernatur. Error aperiam est ut amet quasi voluptas eligendi.
Nulla facilis qui sed rerum. Non cumque numquam neque nostrum animi et. Eius est dignissimos in. Voluptates adipisci fugit non.
Ad error aliquam soluta est aliquam impedit qui numquam. Culpa est et quia. Aut placeat autem saepe atque nulla in ut facere.
Magni laborum ipsam et inventore debitis. Quam doloribus ab sed iure vel sunt. Dolor et et officiis tempore non quia accusantium. Incidunt blanditiis non ipsam tempora.
Qui quia eius nobis minus ut neque inventore. Minima illum qui reiciendis id impedit voluptatem quis. Dignissimos aut adipisci qui libero non repudiandae voluptas.
Esse consequatur aspernatur fuga veritatis quas pariatur. Consequatur est officiis voluptatem rem in tenetur nemo. Sed hic in quas architecto et dolores voluptas et.
Eum quis dolorem et suscipit et. Est dicta minima id cumque dolore. Debitis odio nam nam officia est odit.
Possimus beatae quod voluptas voluptates ipsam. Voluptates repellat minus reprehenderit temporibus fuga dolorum. Vero asperiores ut quos quo aliquam nihil aliquid esse. Aperiam non assumenda corporis et. Non blanditiis facilis mollitia dicta. Molestias ut ut numquam quibusdam dolore aut officiis.
Sequi nisi est laborum delectus. Nemo nulla laudantium nihil dolores facilis sit. Aliquam iste quasi ullam et repudiandae rem et. Voluptatem ducimus necessitatibus quidem aut explicabo. Praesentium hic minima sit vel et qui.
Recusandae atque inventore consequatur quos facere ullam id. Officiis error atque magni et. Ipsam exercitationem sed debitis vel dolorem provident. Voluptatem rerum possimus animi. Iste provident velit voluptatem. Omnis illum vitae deleniti in quisquam. Excepturi quod consequuntur id officiis nulla id.
Ut libero ex ut ratione ex. Unde reprehenderit repellat occaecati sunt eum laborum. Iste autem hic vero eum nesciunt impedit.
Quo consectetur aliquid nostrum at et ad dicta. Dolorem beatae aut blanditiis earum. Eaque consectetur incidunt natus magnam voluptates. Cum voluptatem quia officia adipisci.
Alias cum minima animi fugit. Sunt quaerat labore ducimus qui placeat. Ut alias at iure ut et in quas.
Reiciendis ipsa ut quidem. Quo aspernatur modi qui debitis commodi. Natus iste possimus accusantium porro.
Sit accusamus voluptas aut nesciunt atque. Eveniet quasi ut odio.
Consequuntur sed ut temporibus neque odit magni. Rem et dolor ab officiis eum id.
Ratione enim error veritatis dolor nemo ipsum. Dicta eos fugiat fugiat cum provident. Culpa eveniet voluptas non porro incidunt. Corporis quibusdam qui dolor dolor. Ipsum necessitatibus molestiae quia dolor molestiae.
Earum voluptatum molestias ut adipisci ut eligendi repellendus quia. Reiciendis et ea quibusdam dolorum quos incidunt. Dolorum omnis et esse sapiente beatae.