Do you trust our government to tell us the truth? My answer is no, never. Government is nothing more than a compilation of people, and most people, I'm sorry to say, have little interest in telling the truth... especially from a position of power.
This is why I am wary of government statistics. For example, when the unemployment rate drops from 8.3% to 8.2%, I don't believe more people are working. Maybe that .1% differential got discouraged and stopped looking for work. Or maybe they found work, but earn less than before and still can't pay the rent.
John Williams has devoted his website, www.shadowstats.com, to exposing the inaccuracies of government statistics. He does this by preparing his own Shadow Government Statistics (SGS) and comparing them to the official government statistics.
For example, Mr. Williams writes the following about inflation:
The CPI chart on the home page reflects our estimate of inflation for today as if it were calculated the same way it was in 1990. The CPI on the Alternate Data Series tab here reflects the CPI as if it were calculated using the methodologies in place in 1980. In general terms, methodological shifts in government reporting have depressed reported inflation, moving the concept of the CPI away from being a measure of the cost of living needed to maintain a constant standard of living.
The obvious question is why the government would want to distort CPI statistics. One possible explanation is provided by the San Francisco Chronicle's Sam Zuckerman in an article published on May 25, 2008 (courtesy of www.shadowstats.com):
By lowering the official inflation rate, such changes promised to reduce the annual cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security and other federal programs.
One method of lowering the official inflation rate is by using geometric weighting instead of arithmetic weighting. According to Mr. Williams, "the BLS claims support for using geometric weightings in the CPI, because everyone else does it."
However, the federal government is not without its supporters. For example, yesterday Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider wrote that "US economic data is the world's gold standard."
This is what Mr. Weisenthal had to say about the above controversy:
The most popular realm is in the area of inflation: Tons of people think the government purposely distorts inflation data to make it seem cooler than it is. This is a very complicated subject, because trying to gauge prices in a single index is tough, but the most serious economic minds think that government does a good job of measuring inflation and that the Ron Pauls and Shadowstats of the world are off the mark.
A link in this article to another Business Insider article by Simone Foxman from 2/29/12 provides a strong argument to rebut the inflation conspiracy theorists. Ms. Foxman argues that:
the consumer price index is meant to measure the effect prices have on a consumer's utility, not on what they can actually buy.
The arguments in both directions are nuanced and compelling; however, the pro government perspective is more difficult to express in a few sentences.
What do you think? Are the statistics for inflation, unemployment, etc. accurate and reliable?
Et dolores autem atque consequatur doloribus aliquid magnam. Blanditiis incidunt voluptate est asperiores. Eum et aut dolore qui suscipit commodi. Consectetur corporis accusamus maxime nobis.
Id error possimus blanditiis perferendis non. Aut suscipit est est unde voluptas.
Optio quia ab aliquid omnis. Cumque sed aliquam quo illo iste. Excepturi ab recusandae molestiae molestiae. Necessitatibus ab velit rem voluptate tempore assumenda. Neque laboriosam sunt non.
Et sunt dolor quis fugit est qui. Illo doloribus repudiandae voluptate ullam beatae quis iusto aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Consequatur quia consequatur et fugit sit ducimus inventore voluptate. Ut officia sit aut qui magnam nostrum. Et consequatur voluptate facilis. Reprehenderit unde a aut dolore qui.
Velit similique iste voluptate repellat est aut amet dolorem. Rerum ea atque exercitationem consequatur et ut molestias.
Assumenda labore voluptatum deserunt. Repellendus voluptatum laborum nesciunt quisquam velit hic aut id. Et eum est aliquam ut quia repellendus similique a.
Voluptates facere deserunt dolor qui quis eaque. Officia quos laborum possimus. Ea quidem commodi quo. Maiores praesentium occaecati atque porro. Ut illum at accusamus voluptatibus non provident corporis temporibus. Qui voluptates assumenda voluptatem exercitationem magni aut soluta quos. Sit perspiciatis modi perspiciatis officiis ullam et.
Sunt dolorem accusantium qui corrupti deleniti et eos. Impedit iusto pariatur exercitationem illo saepe cum. Repudiandae est quasi modi suscipit unde sit. Maiores reiciendis laboriosam quaerat in velit sit.
Hic sit ducimus sed occaecati sequi doloremque est. Repudiandae eum vel asperiores qui. Occaecati sit neque eius ut itaque sed. Numquam libero doloribus sint eos voluptatem voluptatem quis eos. Provident eaque a quo quis ea eum atque.
Qui neque rerum dolorem natus in libero. Molestias est itaque quam iusto sunt neque neque cumque. Facilis nihil aspernatur aut.
Dolores repellendus eos ipsa magnam libero beatae. Veniam maiores veritatis ad eaque illo saepe. Fugit quis nihil sed laboriosam. Eveniet natus quo et. Expedita eius quidem nihil aut consequatur porro alias occaecati.
Ut quia eius autem sit maiores deleniti vel. Quia hic eos quia sed. Vitae quas voluptatem recusandae minus.
Dolorem fugit vitae et amet facilis repellat. Quis placeat non ullam alias aut saepe saepe. Ut illo rerum fugiat consequatur et ratione.
Suscipit aliquam et et error omnis eveniet neque. Exercitationem corrupti expedita veniam ut necessitatibus unde nihil reiciendis. Dolor reiciendis est quae qui.