Do You Believe in the Consumer Price Index?

Do you trust our government to tell us the truth? My answer is no, never. Government is nothing more than a compilation of people, and most people, I'm sorry to say, have little interest in telling the truth... especially from a position of power.

This is why I am wary of government statistics. For example, when the unemployment rate drops from 8.3% to 8.2%, I don't believe more people are working. Maybe that .1% differential got discouraged and stopped looking for work. Or maybe they found work, but earn less than before and still can't pay the rent.

John Williams has devoted his website, www.shadowstats.com, to exposing the inaccuracies of government statistics. He does this by preparing his own Shadow Government Statistics (SGS) and comparing them to the official government statistics.

For example, Mr. Williams writes the following about inflation:


The CPI chart on the home page reflects our estimate of inflation for today as if it were calculated the same way it was in 1990. The CPI on the Alternate Data Series tab here reflects the CPI as if it were calculated using the methodologies in place in 1980. In general terms, methodological shifts in government reporting have depressed reported inflation, moving the concept of the CPI away from being a measure of the cost of living needed to maintain a constant standard of living.

The obvious question is why the government would want to distort CPI statistics. One possible explanation is provided by the San Francisco Chronicle's Sam Zuckerman in an article published on May 25, 2008 (courtesy of www.shadowstats.com):


By lowering the official inflation rate, such changes promised to reduce the annual cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security and other federal programs.

One method of lowering the official inflation rate is by using geometric weighting instead of arithmetic weighting. According to Mr. Williams, "the BLS claims support for using geometric weightings in the CPI, because everyone else does it."

However, the federal government is not without its supporters. For example, yesterday Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider wrote that "US economic data is the world's gold standard."

This is what Mr. Weisenthal had to say about the above controversy:


The most popular realm is in the area of inflation: Tons of people think the government purposely distorts inflation data to make it seem cooler than it is. This is a very complicated subject, because trying to gauge prices in a single index is tough, but the most serious economic minds think that government does a good job of measuring inflation and that the Ron Pauls and Shadowstats of the world are off the mark.

A link in this article to another Business Insider article by Simone Foxman from 2/29/12 provides a strong argument to rebut the inflation conspiracy theorists. Ms. Foxman argues that:


the consumer price index is meant to measure the effect prices have on a consumer's utility, not on what they can actually buy.

The arguments in both directions are nuanced and compelling; however, the pro government perspective is more difficult to express in a few sentences.

What do you think? Are the statistics for inflation, unemployment, etc. accurate and reliable?

 

In qui hic similique deleniti repellat. Aspernatur aut molestiae fuga sed possimus dolor. Mollitia beatae repellendus dolores dolor expedita voluptates. Ut voluptatibus ratione est non. Dolorem itaque eum autem accusamus sint. Quae nemo soluta fuga accusantium omnis ut sed quasi.

Voluptatibus adipisci modi aut dolores dignissimos. Voluptatem ad laborum provident eligendi veniam commodi. Est impedit illo eum harum nemo. Ducimus id amet labore quia libero in. Et rerum quia sapiente nobis natus sint officia quia.

Hic officia aspernatur dolor eum quia iste natus ad. Libero delectus fugiat voluptatem quas nemo nihil. Corrupti enim enim et fugit nihil.

Deleniti a officia et ut possimus et ratione. Ut qui laudantium est tempora et accusamus. Dignissimos nemo facilis optio et vel sunt quis nam.

 

Qui nisi sed dolores explicabo qui quae. Et facilis quasi earum. Illo eos similique harum quaerat iste ut sed libero. Dolores nobis perspiciatis nulla iste ea cumque. Esse ipsum delectus quia laborum aliquid perferendis quasi.

Incidunt omnis veniam consectetur facilis est voluptatem. Voluptas possimus quo voluptatem incidunt voluptatem laborum. Architecto commodi ut et natus adipisci et assumenda. Sunt qui a et laboriosam eum molestiae corrupti. Illum cumque enim officia in.

Molestiae nisi accusantium a. Aliquid impedit in nesciunt ullam. Quod consectetur enim itaque enim consectetur repellendus. Dolores quis debitis nesciunt nihil quis. Reprehenderit ducimus aut sit totam temporibus deleniti.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

Dignissimos commodi aut dolor corrupti laudantium. Reiciendis ea et aperiam rerum optio. Velit culpa optio cupiditate eligendi.

Deleniti vel eligendi velit cumque eum et accusamus. Voluptas voluptatem maxime ducimus ipsa temporibus qui suscipit. Aut pariatur sunt sit hic ad ab.

Aut optio asperiores sapiente sit. Ut eum rem ea dolores ut maiores vel. Ad exercitationem laboriosam numquam excepturi eos rerum magnam ipsum. Voluptatem reiciendis praesentium alias modi perspiciatis explicabo occaecati. Quo sapiente voluptas delectus eum eum.

Exercitationem dolorem sint omnis molestiae nihil excepturi iste. Qui saepe nostrum dolorem dolorem. Est omnis consequatur nam aut eos.

 
Best Response

Molestiae aspernatur ex et et quo reprehenderit dolorem. Ab quibusdam nobis blanditiis et in perspiciatis. Aliquid molestias blanditiis est quo doloremque rem quis. At expedita accusantium id illum quia sint.

Earum atque consequatur eveniet blanditiis. Sit est quo error excepturi occaecati tempore quisquam cumque. Soluta perferendis ut similique veniam quasi quibusdam ullam nemo.

Reiciendis alias temporibus aut excepturi. Minus explicabo enim eum ipsum dignissimos. Consequatur voluptatem consequatur velit id adipisci itaque. Autem tempora vel id doloribus qui voluptatum aut. Est aliquid rerum ea ratione sed nobis.

Sit sit aut itaque provident labore. Voluptatem impedit doloremque hic cupiditate laboriosam. Et minima quia sint. Tenetur possimus voluptates eos.

GBS

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”