Mod Note (Andy): INTERVIEW / AMA TUESDAYS - along with Monday @mentions, Wednesday Caption Contests and Thursday WSO Mentors, each Tuesday at 8pm ET we're going to feature an interview or AMA (new or from the vault). This interview originally went up September 2012
This is the second and final part of my interview with David Daneshgar (See Part 1 here). This time the focus is not on his awesome up and coming business (www.bloomnation.com) but rather on his interesting background as a professional winner.
David won event #52 at the 2008 WSOP ($625,443 prize) , has his own poker website (www.dcdpoker.com), and is willing to teach you how to win for a whole lot of money.
How did you feel the moment you won the tournament at the 2008 WSOP?
It was exhilarating; a surreal moment. There are a few videos of me out there that show how emotional I was.
Just to give you some clarity there are 40 tournaments a year ranging from a couple hundreds to a couple of millions for first place. In WSOP 2008 there were 2700 contestants, so no one in their wildest dreams was thinking “Oh I am gonna win this”, but when you get deep you start assessing the possibility of being infamous, of actually winning.
The day before the final, when there were 13 or 14 players I started to realize: I’m in Nevada, LA (home) is really close, I have my mom and brother here and all the support I can have. I can win this.
What happened that night?
The very first hand I lost a massive loss, I was one of the chip leaders and all of a sudden I was in the last place. My mom kept telling me: If it’s meant to be then it’s meant to be, if you have to let it go, just let it go. “Maybe you’re meant to lost that hand so you can win another and change the whole dynamic”.
Is that what happened?
That’s exactly what happened, and it was surreal for me! I was so entrenched in poker since I was very young and it’s the greatest feeling when you win something that you’ve always wanted to win.
Did the win quench your thirst and hunger for poker or made you hungrier?
It did, at a certain point, I kind of simmered down on poker, and I wasn’t playing as much and I kind of got in the business side of things. But I certainly have a lot of high-end clientele that I am tutoring and teaching so this gives me my much needed poker dose.
Do you enjoy teaching people?
This whole thing started because at Berkley I was teaching a gaming and statistics class. I think it’s really interesting to me, it is like a puzzle, I get those people and I try to find out why they are not winning. I can’t make them win, I can only give them the tools and make them win by themselves, but it’s interesting to break down the psychology and the understanding and human behavior and instill those tools in someone to make them a better player. It is fulfilling, and obviously it pays well to so that doesn’t hurt.
Do you see signs in your students that tell you whether they are going to be great poker players or just hopeless cases?
I charge a lot, so most of the people that come to me are high networth individuals so most of them are mostly executives, hedge fund managers and so forth. All of them could beat their games, so it is highly likely they can beat their rich friends at a poker game, because they get it.
If I pester you to teach me something about poker right now, what would it be?
I would teach you the most important things in poker. People.
People?
Yes, in split seconds people can’t really think deep. I use this in business as well; I used to learn that everyone who acts weak is strong and everyone who acts strong is weak. If someone is like “woohoo, I have a great hand” that usually means they don’t have a good hand. Would someone with a great hand subconsciously want to advertise his or her winning possibility? No, that’s what amateurs do.
Do you miss playing poker professionally?
It is funny, because business has the same high and drive. I really haven’t missed the feeling because www.bloomnation.com gives me the same passionate feeling.
Will you go back to exclusively playing poker?
When this catches on and we have expanded and I have more time for myself, at exit so to speak, I think I will go back to playing poker.
Poker itself is not an easy profession to make a living off, it’s a great hobby but it’s difficult to have the whole variance of your income depending on the swings of games. Emotionally it is devastating; you lose a 100,000 in a week and you feel like shit.
When do you want to retire, David?
Because I am doing what I like I don’t think I will put a number on when I want to retire.
Where do you want to retire?
Los Angeles- I have to stay close to family. As I’ve said we are Persian so family ties are very strong. I’d like to be in NY for a year, but in the end I want to live where I can raise a family.
Thanks D & David! great interview
Your post make it sound like you won the main event. Why don't you provide more details as to what event you won that year?
"David won event #52 at the 2008 WSOP ($625,443 prize)"
http://www.wsop.com/players/playerprofile.asp?playerID=3815
Good stuff
Sorry but it's killing me:
'Losing' not 'Loosing'
I thought Bloomnation referred to Mr Viktor "DURRRRNOMORE" Blom.
I need to learn some poker, Anyone able to tell me if the skillset transfers at all to trading? At least the math in your head and decision making?
It helps, but it is much more about psychology than the math. In limit poker there are correct/incorrect decisions because of the fixed betting structure, in no limit it is more about reads.
Kyleyboy,
Compared to other professions, poker has many parallels to trading.
The math behind equity calculations, hand ranges, and possible outcomes on future streets is similar to financial modeling.
Game Theory(GTO) is becoming a much larger part of the game now compared to just a few years ago.
Making good decisions with asymmetric information is a large part of success in poker.
Consistently working on your game through upswings and downswings.
Reducing mistakes over time. Focusing on the long-run rather than having a short-run/results oriented way of thinking.
Improving ones ability to understand “tilt” and how it changes your perceptions of the game, cards, players, self.
The ability to “read” people and player types and understand, or at the very least get close to understanding how they view the game so as to design the best strategy to take advantage/exploit their weaknesses.
great interview
Magnam dolore quo similique eum ea suscipit. Fugiat hic enim harum.
Autem nobis reiciendis atque beatae. Facere qui aspernatur ullam quia dolor quia quibusdam. Qui doloribus possimus quia soluta blanditiis quia nihil ullam. Autem ipsa non nam in repellendus. Odit aliquid est ex voluptatem.
Quia aliquam consequatur debitis saepe eaque. Perspiciatis magnam doloribus omnis. Ut accusamus cupiditate delectus et ratione iusto officiis.
Inventore vero tempora a illo fuga voluptas. Praesentium molestias dolor dolorem hic quia ab. Quam placeat ea facilis dolores consectetur. Qui laudantium provident repellendus quia asperiores possimus deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...