Patriot Coal Bankruptcy: A Sign of the Times for the Energy Sector

Last Monday, Patriot Coal (PCX) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and was the first ship to go down in the declining coal industry. This bankruptcy and the current rock-bottom valuations of the US coal stocks (ACI, ANR, WLT, BTU, ect.) are a sign of the shifting sands in the energy sector as natural gas rises in importance and developing countries rely less on energy imports.

“The coal industry is undergoing a major transformation and Patriot’s existing capital structure prevents it from making the necessary adjustments to achieve long-term success,” Irl F. Engelhardt, Patriot’s chairman and chief executive, said in a statement. “Our objective is to use the reorganization process to address important issues in an orderly way and make the company stronger and more competitive.”

Patriot may have secured some $802 million in restructuring financing, but it may just be delaying the inevitable as the coal industry is experiencing both a cyclical and structural decline.

The current decline is cyclical because of waning global energy demand and the unusually warm winter which built up excessive energy inventories. More importantly, the decline is structural because the new threat from the shale gas boom in the US. Further, power companies are retooling plants to handle both coal and gas for electricity generation in order to be able to opportunistically switch between the energy sources.

Furthermore, international demand for US coal imports is declining as well due to many new coal mines springing up in Indonesia, Australia, and Mongolia. Not only are those mines flooding the demand coming out of India and China, but demand is also coming up flat. Steel production (the other major use for coal) is flat as China's sky scraper building spree is not what it used to be, and new efforts to put up nuclear (Fukushima be damned) , solar, and other forms of energy do not speak well for future coal demand growth.

The icing on the cake is that none of the Coal companies really saw this coming and prepared for this much cannibalization. With the exception of maybe Peabody (BTU) who has been aggressively buying Asian coal assets and Console Energy (CNX) who has been diversifying into the LNG business, the typical US domestic players (Arch Coal, Alpha Natural Resources, Walter Energy, ect.) have been expanding domestically and adding on debt. Arch and Alpha are both guilty of big coal acquisitions in the last 2 years which puts further strains on their cap structures.

Of course for every bear case, there is a bull case. Despite coal falling as a percentage of global electricity consumption, it should maintain its role as a staple energy source for decades to come and should generate at least a quarter of global power consumption (unless more innovations in alternative energy change that path).

Rapid population growth in developing continents should continue to spur the need for more energy production. In the developed markets, we should also see greater electricity consumption per capita as more electronics are used and as society switches away from crude oil to use the much more efficient electricity grid.

Finally, the fact that coal companies are going out of business should tighten up supply for the coal companies that can ride out the storm. However, the coal companies that will do the best are the ones that follow the BHP model in that they start heavily diversifying both geographically and into other materials. I do think some of the coal stocks are technically over-sold while others are likely to go bankrupt.

As I alluded earlier, this is not just about coal. Cheap coal has implications for the entire energy sector and will likely be a drag on the viability of Nat Gas and solar. One thing we can probably rely on is for cheap electricity to stick around as a theme. The utility companies have been fueled by low interest rates and low input costs now for several years. As utility monopolies get broken up, prices could see meaningful easing or at least stay relatively stable. From an investment perspective I will keep an eye out for companies in industries with high electricity input costs and strong growth profiles.

If you are interested in learning more about the coal space in more detail, I have attached a power point I presented to colleagues and will be posting a detailed financial breakdown of the more capital constrained coal companies (ACI & ANR) on my finance and investing blog (in signature) sometime tomorrow.

 
Best Response

Thanks for the post. How much time do you believe will elapse until US infrastructure is such that gas production will equal or surpass that of coal? I think that cost and environmental benefits inevitably point to a surge in natural gas consumption, thus easing the current supply glut. So, the question isn't if it will happen; it's simply when.

The FERC is ruling later this year (hopefully) on whether the US will be permitted to ship NGLs overseas, something it's not currently allowed to do with any of its energy resources. A lot of governments abroad will have to first be convinced that the massive initial investment in gas powered plants will be worth it in the long-term--once this is done, the US is well positioned to be a key player in the global market. America is forecasted to lead gas/shale production, followed by China; however, experts think that in spite of China's production capabilities, they will still import half of their overall product from the US.

Below is a helpful link to the IEA's World Energy Outlook: Are We Entering the Golden Age of Gas? If you're interested in the subject, it's a good read. It talks about the potential of a gas fueled economy and the barriers that stand in the way. Highly recommend for anyone who works/trades in the energy industry as I do, or simply wants to become learned on the subject.

I was taught that the human brain was the crowning glory of evolution so far, but I think it's a very poor scheme for survival.
 

Great post and good overview of the market. Thanks.

"A strong man cannot help a weaker unless that weaker is willing to be helped, and even the weak man must become strong of himself; he must, by his own efforts, develop the strength which he admires in another. None but himself can alter his condition."
 

Great post! I've been doing a lot of coal research recently and every analyst from BBs say the same thing as you.

@Tolland15: April 2012 - coal and natural gas have hit the same level of electricity production (32%) due to a decade low for natural gas prices. You are definitely right. We are seeing a shift from coal to natural gas and there are so many factors that affect this dynamic. For example, the EPA's Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) could hurt coal plants as early as 2013 by forcing them to get clean technology like baghouses, acis, etc etc. Other regulatory factors such as Utility MACT are forcing utilities to retire coal plants early due to compliance factors. Also, new carbon emission standards of 1,000lbs CO2 / MwH for new power plants means that either new coal plants must have CCS tech or NGCC plants will be built. Most likely the latter given structural costs. EPA is really taking a shit on coal plants.

@anaxi I would love to hear your thoughts on PRB/IB coal and where that's going and how long CAPP/NAPP coal will last in current market conditions.

 

Typos and lack of footnotes. I printed it, marked it, made some comments, scanned it and emailed it to you. I'd like those comments turned and on my desk by tomorrow morning.

You need to up your ATD.

Best,

Already-cynical incoming analyst

 

Eos id dolorem labore. Eligendi labore quae magnam earum. Similique enim et maxime aut. Necessitatibus omnis placeat dicta fuga quam. Quisquam eius eos sed et.

Voluptas aut nobis modi nihil autem. Neque ipsum et unde porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”