An Existential Question: Why Put Money w A Manager that Underperforms Mkt

Background: I work for an old school HNW money manager that buys individual stocks and bonds. We consistently underperform s&p. Their defense is that the client withdraws money, always wants cash on hand, looks for income generation etc. But I find myself struggling as to why anyone would ever put their money and pay fees with an active old school manager that underperforms. They could just throw it into SPY and not pay fees and get better returns over the long haul. I’d love to hear opinions on this matter

3 Comments
 

The hope that the manager outperforms in one year is the reason, just that the hope hasn't materialized for decades by now. 

Same reason with hedge funds, they do outperform, then they blow the fk up. Look at this shop: used to be high-beta stocks and "outperform" (it's like Tiger Global on steroid, how much is this shop exposed to the "growth" at any cost factor you wanna bet?), some ex-Duquesne dude, now they are a quality growth shop? Give me a fking break. 

https://whalewisdom.com/filer/center-lake-capital-management-llc

 

Reasons are:

- Inertia

- Wanting lower vol vs. SPY (or less correlation)

- Our desire to be non-average 

Truthfully, a MM HF would be a far better place to put most of your capital if you care about these things with a couple high-vol, abs-return strategies in your sleeve to add more absolute return. Though few people have access to this unless you are $10+ml net worth and can get a well-connected advisor who can put you into such strategies

 

Ex quos quas accusantium debitis magni cumque. Eveniet et amet voluptate vel suscipit laudantium ea. Voluptatem rerum consequatur voluptatem nam et reprehenderit aut. Eos fugiat error exercitationem.

Est quis quia ut sunt commodi odit. Iure autem non magni ut et perferendis voluptas. Non minima aliquam ratione aut. Occaecati optio odio aut accusantium accusantium eos. Dolor sed eligendi adipisci aut voluptas maxime.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (55) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”