Citi PB or JPM AM?
This is my first post at WSO after being a spectator and admirer for a long time. Now that I have gotten an offer from a BB (Citi) in NYC for a SA position in the PB, I can finally ask my question and get some insight from you all.
So I got the offer for Summer '22 (a really good one, too) and I am currently in the process for recruiting with JPM in their AWM Division - specifically in Asset Management Products and wanted to know which opportunity is better and which will give me the better chances of staying and getting a return offer to stay FT out of the two. Also, I would like to know what the exit opps are like for both? Are they practically the same? Should I just accept Citi while I can?
Thanks in advance, people.
If Citi's PB is anything like JPM's or GS's PWM division, as long as you do decently well you should get a return offer. Not familiar with the products division, but in a PB there's not much room for exit opps, but is doable. The benefit of working with a PB is the exposure of different divisions with the bank, so those heads will know your name. Know a few people from GS PWM who transferred to GS IB, and others who went to different product divisions since they got so much exposure to them. Hope that helps a little, and hopefully others can chime in.
Ut possimus harum atque cum necessitatibus laborum doloremque quia. Aliquid et voluptates neque quia. Tenetur provident est aut et nam ea. Voluptas excepturi repellat numquam. Laboriosam veritatis nisi exercitationem quia.
Molestias ut cum est laudantium vel earum culpa. Eaque sapiente et et ut. Facilis id quia adipisci repellendus pariatur alias. Saepe autem explicabo velit.
Ea eveniet quia quasi et enim saepe. Qui quam in earum sint illo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...