Finance - Theory: Can you immunize a portfolio with dividend yield?

Hi all,

I have a 2 part finance-theory question I was hoping to collectively source here. It is has 2 parts:

a. Can a fund, such as a pension plan, immunize a portfolio using dividend yield rather than bond yields as is traditionally done? Why/ Why not? What would be the risks from this? b. Can a fund, such as a pension plan, use dividend yield as a measure to hit their actuarial rate of return? Why / Why not? What would be the risks from this?

Overall I'm trying to get a deeper understanding of the differences between the cash-flows from bonds and stocks and how they could be use to either immunize or (to a high degree of accuracy) hit the actuarial rate of return assumptions on a fund. Ie: if you have a 6% actuarial rate of return, could you create a portfolio of dividend yielding stocks with a collective yield of 6% to effectively ensure your actuarial rate of return is hit?

3 Comments
 

No. The basic concept behind a bond is that short of default, you get face value back at the end. With a stock there is nothing but the yield and the future value of the stock. A company like Sears could pay out 10%. If it goes under after two years, you still have huge losses. There are smart ways to utilize yield, but this isn't one.

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.
 
Most Helpful

Ya with bonds there is safety and stability of principle (short of default). The bond is also a contractual obligation that the company has made to pay back its debt with interest. There is no such obligation for a company to pay a dividend or maintain any certain level of dividend payment (see GE). The other key to immunization is matching the duration of the liabilities (or at least attempting to). There is no true duration in equities (although I've seen it argued that stocks do have duration given how valuations have historically been negatively correlated with interest rates).

 

Aliquid officiis blanditiis est quia aut id. Libero rerum omnis aspernatur ea nisi qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”