Biglaw vs MBB
I’ve graduated after a fully-funded law degree (and so don’t have law school debts to pay off) and have offers to join a Biglaw firm or to join a MBB.
I’ve had summer experiences at both. I found my experience at the consulting firm more enjoyable and enjoyed the work a bit more. My personal verdict is that Biglaw is slightly less interesting to me but more of a stable and lucrative career overall, so I’m weighing up what is a better bet. It unnerves me slightly how many people are forced out at all levels in consulting generally.
I’m not sure what I see myself doing in the long-term, although I likely do not see myself as a law firm or MBB partner, so would at some point transition out of either. Either way, I'd still like to be making reasonable money after an exit from either.
Any advice on how to approach this decision / what to think about, or what you’d recommend?
Thanks!
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key points to consider when deciding between Biglaw and MBB consulting:
Factors to Consider:
Personal Interest and Enjoyment:
Career Stability and Lucrativeness:
Exit Opportunities:
Firm Size and Culture:
Long-Term Vision:
Recommendations:
Ultimately, the decision should align with your personal interests, career goals, and lifestyle preferences. Good luck!
Sources: Some Thoughts on Managing Multiple Offers (Consulting / MBB), Some Thoughts on Managing Multiple Offers (Consulting / MBB), Big Law (M&A) to IBD Associate, Received offers from all three MBB firms and don't know what to do, Q&A: Big4 Consulting to Private Equity, now M7 MBA
US lawyer perspective here - practice law now, even if just for 2 years. Lawyers are always leaving the law, so you can then try consulting (or anything else) if you're not happy. Even if you get stuck with "less interesting" work in the meantime, you'll pick up an execution sharpness plus lens for evaluating risk/understanding the law that you would not otherwise pick up in a non-legal job. It's difficult to explain, but I work daily with people (1) who have law degrees but went straight to finance/investing and never practiced, (2) non-lawyers dealing with legal issues, and (3) lawyers who now sit in finance/investing roles after practicing for 2-10 years, and even the smartest people in groups 1 and 2 are missing a little something relative to the former lawyers, even if they only practiced for a few years. Similar to the comment I'm sure you heard at the beginning of law school, 'this experience will teach you to think in different ways,' there really is no substitute for actually practicing for a few years.
yeah a friend of mine got his jd, did biglaw for 2 years, quit, and went to a bb ib firm as an associate
Corrupti aspernatur consequatur eum accusantium. Numquam natus cupiditate distinctio quis. Quia aut quia dolor culpa enim.
Ut libero eum ipsa qui. Delectus et sed accusantium enim libero non aut. Vel asperiores architecto tempore et accusamus impedit enim. Aspernatur consequatur consequatur ratione qui adipisci. Iusto exercitationem consequatur est suscipit quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...