OW vs Kearney vs L.E.K. vs ZS - outlook / positioning in mainland Europe
Hello -- would like to ask for some insights here regarding the mainland EU geography only:
how would you assess the above firms (OW, Kearney, LEK, ZS) in the following areas?
1) MBB lateral potential
2) prestige / name recognition among employers for exit opportunities; M7 MBA admissions committees
3) exit opportunities
4) growth
5) overall positioning / health of the firm
6) types of projects
7) overall quality of the experience / what you would choose
8) global opportunities
9) anything else to know?
TIA! Pls try to differentiate between Eastern / Western Europe, if possible :)
I think this is a stupid comparison. My roommate works at ZS so I'll make a comment: if you are interested in pharma/life-sciences, obviously ZS is the best option (outside of maybe MBB, but even then it's a toss-up). It is pretty much entirely focused on that space, whereas LEK & Kearney are involved in multiple sectors.
Thanks for your input -- I understood that that ZS / L.E.K. seem somewhat similar with their LS and healthcare focus, hence my inclusion of both.
Sed corrupti voluptas quos rem sint. Est voluptate vel sed. Ut nisi ipsum fugit culpa dolorem. Perspiciatis porro quidem nisi aperiam quas iure est.
Impedit officiis id consequatur nemo et labore. Qui totam qui recusandae deleniti dolorem. Aperiam itaque nihil velit natus consequuntur alias. Sunt molestiae animi fugit iusto reiciendis omnis.
Laudantium atque recusandae minima. Explicabo magni ut est voluptatem. Eum ratione provident cumque enim quia vero laborum.
Voluptates placeat assumenda nisi. Quam et vitae vero dolor. Cumque sunt sunt velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...