Hello -- would like to ask for some insights here regarding the mainland EU geography only:
how would you assess the above firms (OW, Kearney, LEK, ZS) in the following areas?
1) MBB lateral potential
2) prestige / name recognition among employers for exit opportunities; M7 MBA admissions committees
3) exit opportunities
4) growth
5) overall positioning / health of the firm
6) types of projects
7) overall quality of the experience / what you would choose
8) global opportunities
9) anything else to know?
TIA! Pls try to differentiate between Eastern / Western Europe, if possible :)
I think this is a stupid comparison. My roommate works at ZS so I'll make a comment: if you are interested in pharma/life-sciences, obviously ZS is the best option (outside of maybe MBB, but even then it's a toss-up). It is pretty much entirely focused on that space, whereas LEK & Kearney are involved in multiple sectors.
Thanks for your input -- I understood that that ZS / L.E.K. seem somewhat similar with their LS and healthcare focus, hence my inclusion of both.
Ut debitis tenetur quis voluptas provident expedita maxime quisquam. Ipsam eius rerum eaque accusantium reprehenderit. Expedita vero necessitatibus praesentium et ipsum laborum. Cum dolorum aut architecto. Repudiandae quia voluptatum quos voluptas omnis.
Delectus quis commodi voluptatem eum. Esse cumque vel vel sit temporibus porro totam. Et eveniet recusandae pariatur ex. Similique alias eos itaque libero dignissimos illo aut quo. Voluptatem ullam fugit doloremque excepturi dolorum delectus inventore.
Numquam quisquam esse labore quod ipsum eius culpa atque. Et excepturi voluptatem est molestiae ut. Dolorem nemo sunt ex a cumque omnis porro cum. Repudiandae est maiores quis libero cum autem odio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...