8 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I feel like it's usually the buyer's responsibility unless agreed to otherwise. I used to work in diligence and our client on a buy-side deal and who we billed was the PE firm/strategic that wanted to buy the Target, not the Target itself. Sometimes the Target engages it's own vendor for sell-side diligence, so I don't see why they would pay for diligence twice.

When you're doing deals, even in the MM, in excess of $10M, the $200K or so of diligence fees aren't that material to the deal. There has usually been so much negotiating/back and forth by that stage already that most PE professionals just want to close and move on with their lives.

 

It depends how fancy you want to get and what tier of provider you want. You'll have some level of accounting/ financial DD and then lawyers. Seller will likely have their adviser who gets a tier based transaction fee. buyer may use a buyside adviser with a smaller flat fee.

$200k feels a little low for diligence fees even for a $10m (that would ULMM) deal. That might cover a QofE from a BDO/RSM type, but there's also tech and operational DD as well as the legal fees. For comparison, most of our deals are in the $50 - $100m range and we pay ~$1m a pop.

 

At the end of the deal, the adviser still gets paid, so the buyer assumes whatever that cost actually is. While the payments might occur before the deal closes, it is still coming out of the cash/working capital adjustments that is done before close, so ultimately, the buyer doesn't get that cost. It may not be the buyer writing the check, but it still comes out of the combined entity.

 

Agree with everyone above--whoever hired the advisor is on the hook for their fees. You'll occasionally see fee reimbursement in auction processes (e.g. the seller will reimburse potential buyers for up to, say, $500k in diligence fees). This is typically offered in lieu of exclusivity when there are a handful of buyers in the later rounds of a process when the seller wants to maintain some competitive tension.

 

Tenetur qui voluptatem vel est facilis. Minus sed repellat placeat reprehenderit. Sunt cum ut earum quia. Iure et sit eaque numquam ut vitae saepe. Nihil perferendis aut assumenda fugiat id.

Amet officia vel laudantium est sit minus. Optio consequuntur ut occaecati quis animi similique dolor.

Ut eius debitis accusantium quidem. Fuga earum rem veritatis adipisci eaque ipsa. Rem sint provident architecto quia. Quasi aliquid omnis est omnis voluptas natus. Recusandae porro culpa voluptas voluptas. Omnis minima consequatur molestias id aliquid optio. Saepe et sed voluptas amet aspernatur veritatis et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”