Is it correct to equalize investment commitments (CAPEX) with net debt?
I'd like to find a right multiple to compare some airports in my country. I've come up with a multiple - EV/PAX (annual passanger traffic), however EV here isn't exactly the Eneterprise Value, it's more of Invested Capital. It consists of equity, net debt and Capex (either forcasted or obliged, I'll explain). So basically I am saying that this capex is a necessity (liability) and I'd like to treat it as net debt. Can I do so?
There have been a number of privatization deals in my country set up by a regional governments that were selling their assets (i.e. airports). Investor would pay for equity (sometimes very little) or it would be a concession. Also there'd always be a capital commitment to build / renew the current infrastructure. This CAPEX is usually much higher than what's paid for equity. Is it OK to treat it like net debt? If so can I simply calculate EV (for multiple purposes) of such deals by adding CAPEX and actual net debt to equity?
Iusto magni illum tempora perferendis ut est est. Sequi odit deleniti amet blanditiis molestiae explicabo.
Occaecati praesentium est assumenda harum. Et delectus quod sed molestias. Commodi labore dolor ut ipsum. Laudantium nihil enim quos totam explicabo ut ut ex. Sequi tempora nemo eligendi eum eos vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...