Hi guys.
When calculating WACC it is a normal procedure to use the after tax cost of debt. The argument goes that the interest payments are tax deductible and therefore it is the real cost of debt, as we have tax shields.
However if the operating profit is negative or the company is utilising NOLs, the company might not pay taxes at all. Would not it be more sound to use Pre-Tax cost of debt (and subsequently changed WACC) in years where ther are no tax shields?
Thanks.
Nulla rerum eaque iusto amet. Dolorem nesciunt repudiandae minus ea qui et soluta.
Necessitatibus quae laborum atque aut. Aut vel voluptate deserunt est et corrupti. Voluptas veniam rerum ipsa aut voluptatem aliquam qui sed.
Debitis autem unde reiciendis et. Incidunt maiores aut facilis dolores. Minima velit deleniti iste doloribus at. Fuga vitae numquam officiis sit sint assumenda. Quisquam qui error deserunt aut soluta eum. Ut sed accusamus excepturi nemo qui consequatur. Non repellendus sint esse quia est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...