Dec 01, 2023

Compare spread on a bond vs a loan/FRN?

I was discussing with a colleague, but in short, how do you compare a fixed bond vs a loan/frn when it comes to spread? Theoretically, you should get paid more for holding fixed bonds, as you have duration risk, so in my view you need to take the z spread of said fixed bond, substract the equivalent maturity swap rate, and compare the result vs the DM/zDM of the loan/FRN. Is this right?

3 Comments
 

You're on the right track! When comparing the spread on a bond versus a loan or Floating Rate Note (FRN), there are indeed different factors to consider.

For a fixed bond, the spread is essentially the difference between the yield of the bond and the yield of a risk-free government bond of the same maturity. This spread compensates you for the additional risk you're taking on by holding the bond, including credit risk, liquidity risk, and as you rightly pointed out, duration risk.

On the other hand, the spread on a loan or FRN is typically over LIBOR or another reference rate. This spread compensates you for the credit risk of the borrower. However, because the interest rate on the loan or FRN is floating, you don't have the same duration risk as with a fixed bond.

So, when comparing the two, you're correct that you would need to consider the Z-spread of the fixed bond, which measures the spread over the entire Treasury yield curve, not just the equivalent maturity point. Subtracting the equivalent maturity swap rate would give you a measure of the credit risk premium on the bond.

Comparing this to the spread on the loan or FRN would give you a sense of the relative compensation for credit risk between the two instruments. However, keep in mind that this doesn't account for the duration risk in the fixed bond, which is not present in the loan or FRN.

So, in essence, you're correct! But remember, this is a simplified explanation and actual market dynamics can be much more complex.

Sources: Help Me Understand Fixed Income Investing, Q&A: Credit hedge fund analyst at MF, former BB trader, Math behind pricing a CMBS loan

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Molestias voluptatum maiores necessitatibus quia totam at. Dolor voluptatem minima excepturi quibusdam doloremque ut non aut.

Ut et et cumque animi. Neque amet dolorem repellendus quasi laborum consequatur possimus. Fugiat at rerum quis et. Et sint itaque placeat vel. Et alias quia quia nisi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”