Aug 27, 2023

How does comp vary between origination vs underwriting?

For firms with separate underwriting / origination roles (eg Monroe, Antares, etc), I’m curious if anyone has a sense of how comp structure varies as you move up, particularly at the Principal / MD levels.

At the senior levels, is origination comp based on a formula based on deal volume sourced, and is underwriting comp based on some other KPI / metric?

Thank you!

6 Comments
 

Hey Senior VP in PE - Other, I'm here because nobody responded to this thread after a few days...maybe one of these resources will help you:

More suggestions...

I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Really interesting, thank you. Any specifics on what the terms look like? Eg does 1 loss wipe out half of your bonus? And is it based on default rate or loss recovery rate?

 
Most Helpful

My shop has separate UW and originator/RM roles. I’m an underwriter / PM, and my comp structure is pretty typical. Base + bonus for junior level, with carry generally starting around VP level. I don’t have specific KPIs/metrics to determine my bonus (although I’m sure some shops do), so my bonus is primarily a combo of personal performance and firm-wide performance. We have a target bonus range (e.g., 50-75% of base), with the low end being personal underperformance and/or a worse year for the firm, and vice versa for top of the range. Maybe you can call it a KPI, but my annual performance reviews look at the number of deals I’ve closed as well as my portfolio management capabilities. And of course all the little stuff on the side, like ad hoc projects, skill in presenting to investment committees, etc.

I don’t have much insight on the origination side, but the bits of info I’ve heard seem to be that it’s tied to deal volume. I believe my shop gives originators a bonus for each deal closed, generally tied to the size of the deal. I personally haven’t heard of any clawback provisions for underperforming deals but wouldn’t be totally shocked if some firms do that.

 

Sunt non eaque minima totam cum qui. Eum quas et dolor est nemo distinctio voluptatem. Nisi doloribus quam non est temporibus inventore. Atque vitae dolor nam pariatur veritatis quia.

Voluptates dolorem est et vel laudantium. Laborum nam similique similique accusamus ut illum. Occaecati cupiditate vel reprehenderit consequatur deserunt magnam.

Aut animi repudiandae veritatis. Iure ut reiciendis molestiae. Sint dolorum iusto minus vel assumenda minus. Aperiam debitis dolorum ipsum harum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”