Mar 01, 2024

Thoughts on Morgan Stanley Private Credit?

As far as scale goes for PC arms of banks, it looks like GS is bigger and maybe more prevalent in the space but MS is growing pretty quick and i’ve seen them popping up in more upmarket deals. North of $10B now in AUM and thats institutional capital / not tied to the MS balance sheet. Any thoughts on this group? Talent, culture, pay, strategy etc. Thanks.

 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, discussions about the private credit arms of major banks like Morgan Stanley (MS) and Goldman Sachs (GS) often highlight several key aspects, including scale, growth, talent, culture, pay, and strategy. While the context provided doesn't specifically mention Morgan Stanley's Private Credit group, we can infer some general insights based on the broader discussions around private credit and the characteristics of top firms in the space.

  1. Scale and Growth: It's noted that GS has a larger presence in the private credit market, but MS is recognized for its rapid growth, especially with over $10B in AUM. This indicates a strong commitment to expanding its private credit operations and competing more aggressively in upmarket deals. The fact that this capital is institutional and not tied to the MS balance sheet suggests a strategic approach to leveraging external funds for growth.

  2. Talent: Firms like MS attract top talent, especially in growing and competitive areas like private credit. The talent pool likely includes individuals with diverse backgrounds in investment banking, credit analysis, and other relevant fields, contributing to a rich environment for learning and development.

  3. Culture: While specific details about the culture within MS's Private Credit group aren't provided, top-tier firms generally foster a culture of excellence, collaboration, and continuous improvement. The competitive nature of the private credit space also suggests a dynamic and fast-paced work environment.

  4. Pay: Compensation in private credit, especially at prestigious firms like MS, is typically competitive with other high-finance roles. Pay structures often include a base salary with performance-based bonuses, reflecting the individual's contribution and the overall success of the group.

  5. Strategy: MS's strategy in private credit appears to focus on growth and capturing more upmarket deals. The emphasis on institutional capital not tied to the balance sheet suggests a cautious yet aggressive approach to scaling their operations and diversifying their investment portfolio.

In summary, Morgan Stanley's Private Credit group is characterized by its rapid growth, competitive positioning in the market, and strategic approach to leveraging institutional capital. While specific details about culture and pay are not provided, it's reasonable to infer that MS offers a dynamic work environment and competitive compensation, attracting top talent to its ranks.

Sources: Private Credit is Paradise, Private Credit out of undergraduate?, MF Liquid Credit vs Private Credit at the analyst level, Insight on Bain’s Private Credit team, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/qa-non-target-top-bucket-ssg-private-creditdirect-lending?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Seems to be somewhat of a unicorn in terms of having a great brand name (vs. the tons of Private Credit upstarts), tremendous growth, + not much “entanglement” with broader MS (i.e., no Balance Sheet capital, as you’ve mentioned). I’ve worked with them on a few deals, and have certainly noticed their hold sizes have grown by a factor of 5-6x; AUM is now in the $20Bn+ range if I had to guess. Can’t comment on culture, but the folks I’ve dealt with have been great. They seem to source most of their junior team in-house at MS (which is not surprising); that may drive culture going forward.

 
Most Helpful

Placeat enim eum illum similique odit. Quod mollitia rerum et quasi architecto ut quia. Et non porro occaecati et porro voluptatem. Rem est laborum dolores.

Pariatur voluptatem corporis assumenda incidunt et repellendus. Omnis et laborum rem quod sint eligendi perspiciatis atque. Rerum quidem animi vitae voluptates necessitatibus. Similique enim et id molestias et modi similique.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”