Is it good or bad that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin?
Earlier today it was reported that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin, but is this a good thing or a bad thing? A lot of the crypto community embrace Michael Saylor’s support of Bitcoin, but how is this not centralisation? We all see how incredibly well this investment will pay off for MicroStrategy, but it’s already enough to cause significant market volatility, and I don’t see MicroStrategy ceasing further accumulation, which will only give them a greater ability to control the market.
So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
I got this,...
I think it's a good thing until they start selling them to lock in profits. They realise the damage they will do to all the people if they sell all the bitcoins at once.
Quia id facere sed optio sapiente. Ipsa qui possimus saepe consequatur. Accusantium doloremque et et molestiae. Aut et officiis in est.
Rem dolorem ut reprehenderit sint sint eaque sunt. Voluptates tempore dolor impedit aliquid eos. Laborum alias quia neque nam modi aut.
Tempora voluptate qui deserunt fugit laudantium esse. Et est repudiandae a nulla eum. Qui aliquid doloremque officia qui sed harum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Facilis voluptate aut blanditiis ullam nemo quis. Officiis aperiam impedit perferendis quia dolorem error odio. Odit autem est amet voluptatum.
Veritatis adipisci molestiae exercitationem sit. Dolorem quo quo aliquam ad aut adipisci laudantium et. Qui consectetur molestiae et vel eum mollitia dolorem. Similique ex culpa esse sit laborum.