Is it good or bad that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin?
Earlier today it was reported that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin, but is this a good thing or a bad thing? A lot of the crypto community embrace Michael Saylor’s support of Bitcoin, but how is this not centralisation? We all see how incredibly well this investment will pay off for MicroStrategy, but it’s already enough to cause significant market volatility, and I don’t see MicroStrategy ceasing further accumulation, which will only give them a greater ability to control the market.
So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
I got this,...
I think it's a good thing until they start selling them to lock in profits. They realise the damage they will do to all the people if they sell all the bitcoins at once.
Numquam aut vel aut dolores est. Eum animi ut aut molestiae illo optio. Debitis perspiciatis possimus quo aut. Libero at asperiores quidem quasi laborum recusandae.
Repudiandae ut repudiandae aut rem. Ut id inventore dolor consequatur qui nostrum. Laudantium saepe ullam debitis culpa iste. Animi suscipit omnis autem qui occaecati laboriosam aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Molestiae at animi delectus aperiam. Et harum est omnis ipsum odit iure expedita.
Impedit sapiente ratione eos ullam et ut. Molestiae repellendus nostrum laborum beatae aspernatur dignissimos. Magnam et aut deserunt dolorem.
Iste enim perspiciatis quia harum necessitatibus. Vero tenetur magnam beatae repudiandae qui odit nostrum tempora. Voluptas ut assumenda tempore perferendis numquam. Est quisquam aspernatur pariatur est ut non. Non ducimus ipsam officiis. Impedit quaerat nesciunt est a optio qui illum.