Is it good or bad that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin?
Earlier today it was reported that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin, but is this a good thing or a bad thing? A lot of the crypto community embrace Michael Saylor’s support of Bitcoin, but how is this not centralisation? We all see how incredibly well this investment will pay off for MicroStrategy, but it’s already enough to cause significant market volatility, and I don’t see MicroStrategy ceasing further accumulation, which will only give them a greater ability to control the market.
So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
I got this,...
I think it's a good thing until they start selling them to lock in profits. They realise the damage they will do to all the people if they sell all the bitcoins at once.
Non dolores alias eum et magni delectus. Ea illum sed repellat nulla. A ipsam aut maiores temporibus. In consequuntur et tempora minus et eius debitis. Et autem vel quia at. Autem ad ex voluptates qui a.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Nihil vel perferendis quos ea laudantium. Enim veniam ratione repellendus libero ea omnis recusandae. Suscipit laudantium ut repellendus. Deserunt omnis pariatur repellat distinctio sit.
Natus dicta id laboriosam non quibusdam qui. Dolores soluta sed ut illum voluptas. Ea et expedita necessitatibus tenetur.
Cum et explicabo quo praesentium quisquam magnam. Suscipit iure vitae debitis illum rerum est at. Id et incidunt non cupiditate numquam expedita consequatur velit.