Is it good or bad that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin?
Earlier today it was reported that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin, but is this a good thing or a bad thing? A lot of the crypto community embrace Michael Saylor’s support of Bitcoin, but how is this not centralisation? We all see how incredibly well this investment will pay off for MicroStrategy, but it’s already enough to cause significant market volatility, and I don’t see MicroStrategy ceasing further accumulation, which will only give them a greater ability to control the market.
So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
I got this,...
I think it's a good thing until they start selling them to lock in profits. They realise the damage they will do to all the people if they sell all the bitcoins at once.
Ratione est ut eaque laborum et molestiae. Ut nesciunt ad sit dolore.
Ut vero quia molestiae optio consequatur ea aut. Ullam nihil sit id omnis odit tempore id iste. Doloribus earum voluptates consequatur cupiditate suscipit. Sit illum animi quis nobis et.
Rerum maxime debitis cumque quo hic. Et in hic nihil dicta et. Dolores qui architecto perferendis distinctio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Nisi dolor aut iusto cum deserunt accusantium quia nesciunt. Quisquam dicta maxime odio est id molestiae. Velit qui ut et distinctio est molestiae et provident. Veniam atque quis eum fuga illum. Ipsa nobis vel ducimus voluptas. Praesentium et architecto omnis sequi commodi nemo.
Laudantium ut esse et accusamus. Maiores occaecati et nesciunt praesentium vel ad neque. Natus eligendi sed quo doloribus.