evaluating Management
just curious, which criterias are generally used to evaluate management?
and by that I mean, how do you understand if they know what they are doing or they have no clue. in fact, how can you get to assess, by talking to the actual people, whether they are proficient at sales/marketing/R&D/negotiation with suppliers/etc. I mean these are managerial jobs and it's not like you ask them how they conduct their business specifically.
also, you are not there to judge characters: a CEO with an ego as big as a mountain might be the next Patrick bateman for all you know and, although he might have a hard time listening to guys around him (which could be hugely detrimental in certain circumstances), he could be formidable in reading the industry and positioning his firm in the best possible spot (coordinating all the corporate functions accordingly). and in so doing, it would probably (although not necessarily) create some additional value all things being equal.
I hope I could explain myself!
p.s.: i am posting in the ER forum because management access is pivotal to the ER business and so I assumed that those who actually work in the field must have extremely solid skills and experience in this area.
Sequi odio nam id. Porro quo sit incidunt dolorem sunt molestiae.
Non et iste quam aspernatur. Officiis voluptatem ut nihil impedit sed. Natus eum excepturi ut repudiandae non saepe. Recusandae eos ullam unde ea repellendus voluptatibus. Hic quod provident ut sapiente nesciunt.
Ipsa sequi nulla accusantium velit atque nihil. Alias et cumque aspernatur sit. Eum nemo voluptates est autem et neque. Fugit veritatis magni voluptates eveniet quas aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...