Most and least modeling-intensive sectors

Are certain sectors or teams in ER generally more "model-heavy" than others? For example, is it fair to say you will spend a lot more hours opining over a DCF in pharma than, say, consumer goods teams?

Any information would be appreciated. As someone looking to enter the field, I absolutely love writing but wouldn't consider myself an expert in modeling.

7 Comments
 

Where did I say I hate it? I'm in undergrad and right now I'm more comfortable with writing than modeling, so I'd rather go somewhere that provides more of a learning curve.

Hatred and lack of exposure are completely different, and I'm not too sure where your anger's coming from here.

 
Professor Plum

I suspect that sectors with fewer inputs have less modeling. So something like biotech, which may have companies that dont have profit might not be a difficult model, RE on the other hand has lots of inputs.

Had to bump this because it is generally wrong.

Biotech has its fair share of inputs and its model's are far from simple. Pipeline, patent's, cannibalization from generic's, tax credits etc. are all inputs that are not necessarily straight forward

I think most analyst would say that larger tech and retail firms are generally the easiest to model. Or said differently, have the most straight forward inputs.

"Sounds to me like you guys a couple of bookies."
 
Best Response
BillyRay05 Professor Plum:

I suspect that sectors with fewer inputs have less modeling. So something like biotech, which may have companies that dont have profit might not be a difficult model, RE on the other hand has lots of inputs.

Had to bump this because it is generally wrong.

Biotech has its fair share of inputs and its model's are far from simple. Pipeline, patent's, cannibalization from generic's, tax credits etc. are all inputs that are not necessarily straight forward

I think most analyst would say that larger tech and retail firms are generally the easiest to model. Or said differently, have the most straight forward inputs.

Largely this. Consumer stocks in general. Tech is tough for different reasons other than modelling.

 

Aut quaerat et ducimus ut voluptas. Est omnis consequatur omnis asperiores aut possimus quaerat.

Enim sit in aut id. Sit architecto perferendis ratione qui distinctio enim reprehenderit aperiam. Quas asperiores in a sequi cum quis distinctio. Itaque est qui est qui. Voluptatem iure magnam dolor temporibus. Non nobis ex distinctio eligendi magni.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”