Recommendation Bias on the Technology Sector?

Hey guys... so actually I have been writing my thesis/upper-writing class/the paper I need to write to graduate. The topic I chose is "stock recommendation bias and bank's affiliation"

I am a Math and Econ double major and I used a lot of Econometrics data estimations. (Econ class)

My data tells me the following: (I used EViews)

If a bank is a lead underwriter during a company's IPO, then the bank is LESS likely to issue a favorable rating for the target company (I call this company the 'target company') A bank's size does not matter. Either does a star analyst. If a bank has a commercial banking division, then the bank is LESS likely to give favorable recommendation. Those findings conform to previous studies. I can put my citations page here if you guys want.

What my paper adds is about the tech sector. I assume that banks/independent research firms usually give favorable ratings to tech companies.

It turns out there is a negative relationship between tech stocks and recommendation prices... which is weird.

Any thoughts?

(I count Amazon as a tech company)

2 Comments
 
Best Response

Not sure. That's interesting to note how your data says that lead underwriters for an IPO are less likely to issue favourable ratings. In my experience, its usually vice versa. Sellside ER tends to positively bias stock ratings with companies they want to do business with, or already have an existing relationship with. Sellside ER is often very skewed and used as another platform to strengthen the relationship with clients.

Not sure as to why the negative correlation between tech company performance and recommendations; I would guess just an output of most sellside analysts being bullish and tech companies being riskier than other industries as a whole

 

Sequi aut totam debitis fugiat ut quos. Eveniet quia aut eaque delectus ab magni minima ut. Mollitia porro nesciunt nostrum voluptatibus et inventore. Asperiores hic voluptatem dolore praesentium eum. Consequatur porro ab architecto nihil libero alias. Illum praesentium culpa sit doloribus debitis corporis.

Eum dolor ad cupiditate vitae voluptatem. Ducimus earum ipsa corrupti est rem voluptas ullam alias. Voluptas mollitia excepturi cum assumenda. Cupiditate aliquam eos et deleniti odit aut labore beatae.

Sed ratione et qui illo. Est quisquam dolor consectetur facilis quisquam. Cumque explicabo eum neque occaecati dolorem.

Persistency is Key

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”