Two questions from "Essays of Warren Buffett"

Hi everyone.

I was just reading this book and came across two points which i didn't understand.

1. Cunningham says: "First, standards for measuring a CEO's performance are inadequate or easy to manipulate, so a CEO's performance is harder to measure than that of most workers. Second, no one is senior to the CEO, so no senior person's performance can be measured either"

I understood the first part about CEO's results being harder to measure. However, the second point did not make sense to me. How does nobody being senior to the CEO lead to the inability to measure other senior person's performance?

2. After describing problems arising from a corporation without a controlling shareholder, Buffett says "the strongest weapon a director can wield in these situations remains his or her threat to resign".

How would the resignation of a director affect the management of the company? The only way I could think of is if the director sells his shares when he resigns, sending the stock price down.

Appreciate your inputs on these!

3 Comments
 
  1. If no one is senior to the CEO, then there's no higher/senior authority beyond the CEO to measure himher up.

  2. If a Director resigns, or if there's upheaval /lack of direction within the Board, it will stress out the stock price, too. Bill Ackman resigned from JCPs Board http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/13/us-jcpenney-ackman-idUSBRE97C… today after pushing for changes for two years.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 
Best Response

Regarding your first question – I’d seen that passage before (it is a foreward by Prof. Lawrence Cunningham at GWU Law School, see here http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2013/03/29/governance-buffett-styl…) and also found it hard to read. Basically what he’s saying is that the CEO’s performance is hard enough to measure because there’s no employee that’s senior to him, and what compounds the issue is really the absence of any employee that oversees the CEO. That’s why it’s so important to look for a company that has proper corporate governance and board to act as a series of checks and balances and protect the interest of shareholders. The issue is that in many cases, the CEO also has some real influence on the board so it’s hard to extricate the effect of any biased relationships or conflicts of interest. Therefore, prudent investors would take a look at a company’s board and figure out how shareholder-friendly it is (i.e. are most of the directors independent, are there few anti-takeover defenses, have most of the board members had lots of industry experience and don’t have consulting or other business-related dealings with the company, etc.)

Regarding your second point, generally the resignation of a director without reasonable cause is a concern. Of course, most people don’t even bother to look at these 8-K’s or proxy filings so they don’t know. However, this is not uncommon with scandalous companies - board members just don’t want to get embroiled in that sort of thing, but also realize that whistle-blowing could jeopardize their sleeve of options or deferred stock units – so the best thing to do is for them to leave gracefully. However, prudent investors will pay attention to turnover in the board of directors. If it’s a good company on the up-and-up, there’s really no reason why directors would want to resign unless they had some personal issues because in these cases, their compensation packages would likely go up in value.

​* http://www.linkedin.com/in/numicareerconsulting
 

Maxime illum dicta magni aperiam numquam magnam quo. Consequatur aut tempore natus sit explicabo minima dolor. At sed est dolores dolore. Inventore minima ut enim sunt aliquid sit. Aut eos quo et velit accusantium ipsam perferendis. Sunt unde autem minus animi qui doloribus ex. Minima adipisci soluta hic possimus iste porro.

Deserunt omnis mollitia quos autem. Repellat ut et vero sapiente aut minima quia. Est id ut repellendus in perferendis soluta rerum qui.

Aliquam qui saepe est eos. Aut molestias ea sunt ex voluptate nemo perferendis. Dignissimos sed sint consequatur. Ipsa quidem voluptatem deserunt dolorem.

Nam nobis et assumenda illum molestiae voluptatem repellat. Optio saepe explicabo qui eaque quod sunt. Id perferendis et vero aut. Libero maxime illum hic id aut debitis repudiandae quibusdam. Odit nobis amet sit nisi voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”