What types of companies can't be valued using the standard DCF model?

Just want to hearing other industry experts' opinions on what types of companies are not value-able using the standard DCF model (FCF-based). Currently I have the following:

  1. Banks (driven by loans/deposits)
  2. Insurance companies (driven by written premiums and claims)
  3. Private equities/other balance-sheet-based financial companies (driven by proprietary investments)
  4. REITs (driven by property assets)
  5. Business development companies (driven by value of portfolio companies)
  6. Pharma (can't assign terminal value to patents, need multiple DCF to value different drugs)
  7. Mining (finite value dependent on individual mines)
  8. Oil & gas (finite value depended on oil/gas reserves)
  9. Utilities (regulated ROI)

Are these correct and are there any other type of companies that can't be valued using the standard DCF model?

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Answer from Reddit:

You don't really value a REIT using a discounted cash flow model. A Net Asset Value (NAV) model is used instead.

Here's a primer

You look at the REIT’s existing NOI by segment, and assign a Cap Rate to each segment to determine how much each one is worth. Sum up each segment’s value to calculate how much the Gross Real Estate Assets of the REIT are worth.

Then, you value the rest of the REIT’s assets (anything non-real-estate-related + anything real estate-related but non-income-generating, such as Construction in Progress) by assuming a slight premium or discount to their balance sheet values. You exclude Accumulated Depreciation completely.

Add up the total value of all their assets.

Now, assume a slight premium or discount (or nothing at all) for all the REIT’s liabilities, and sum them up.

Subtract the modified liability value from the modified asset value to arrive at the Net Asset Value (NAV), which you can then divide by the share count to get NAV Per Share.

 

Quo quidem ut dolorum aspernatur laborum aut at. Distinctio est ipsam et quos et et velit. Ut fuga voluptas tempore asperiores. Consequuntur voluptatem illo adipisci reprehenderit quis eaque dolor. Sed non dolores cum officiis amet dignissimos architecto.

Maiores eveniet nisi consequatur ea nostrum. Inventore quaerat aliquam non inventore quis rerum. Doloremque voluptas quia nihil est eum sit. Aperiam quas harum quia. Et autem beatae porro possimus dolorum aliquam. Veritatis ut laudantium et distinctio occaecati incidunt eaque sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”