When to use Precedent Transaction Analysis

Is it appropriate to include Precedent Transaction Analysis in a comprehensive equity research report? When is it appropriate to perform such an analysis?

9 Comments
 
Best Response

yeah agreed with the above comments. the name of the valuation method alone is a guide for why it's not the most useful method for valuing a standalone entity from a going-concern perspective.

If anything, transaction comps can serve as a guide to know whether or not your multiple used to value the company of interest makes sense. if you choose a multiple above the range provided by the transaction comps, assuming that they are relatively recent and good comparables for the company of interest, you know that you're likely a bit too aggressive in your estimates. If you're relatively in line with that range, then you better have a justified reason for WHY the company should trade at the upper end of a multiple range for companies that got bought out.

Aside from a few companies in each industry, this is probably unlikely, however. So, using either just a straight comps analysis or a DCF and combo of the two is the better way to go. Either way, though, the transaction comps basis can be a "sanity check."

 
AgainstAllOddsThanks for the help.

Yeah, remember that any transaction is just that, a past transaction - perhaps the single most important thing is that the environment has probably changed a lot since the last transaction.

If you have no or few transactions since 2008, well, that's an issue. If it's an active industry, with lots and lots of recent transactions, OK, there's a case for it.

And remember, people do deals for all sorts of reasons, and I find many of them are done with little regard for good valuation.

if you like it then you shoulda put a banana on it
 

Transaction comps are for M&A... good ways to benchmark enterprise value, because you need to take into account the premium paid for the target.

No reason to use this in ER, or any other type of equity investing. Levered dcf and public comps are always good for finding equity value.

 

Neque voluptatem nihil quos eaque sequi. Saepe omnis magnam ut aspernatur. Voluptas architecto animi quia impedit rerum.

Voluptate vel qui aperiam inventore perferendis. Qui culpa quia nisi sint odio. Amet quia assumenda qui sint laborum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”