Beyond the traditional route of a top IB role followed by a top PE role, are there any other ways to get into activist investing?
How common is starting on the shareholder advisory/defence side then moving over, starting in private credit, or lateraling from another HF?
I understand top roles at Pershing or Elliott pick from the traditional route, but I am more interested in the small to mid cap activist space. Thanks!
| +19 | PhD student with questions regarding long term HF planning | 5 | 2d |
| If you know HF is your end goal, is IB + PE actually worth it? | 7 | 2d | |
| +14 | What’s next for 40y with good career | 13 | 31m |
| +14 | Pitching a short when they're long? | 33 | 11m |
| +11 | "Expected GPA" on apps | 4 | 15h |
| +9 | London industrials IB to HF - how to prepare | 3 | 5d |
| +6 | Feedback on Vic pitch | 6 | 3d |
| +6 | Liquid Credit at LO vs. Multi-Strat HF | 1 | 4d |
| +6 | Birch Grove / Third Point | 1 | 1d |
| +4 | MFPE Analyst Program vs MMHF Acad | 8 | 3m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
What’s driving you to look for alternatives beyond IBD -> PE? That’s going to be the cleanest way to move.
I’ve seen profiles from other funds (L/S and event strats) and some straight from banking though not activism defense groups. Seen one guy from private credit in Europe but that was a one off and he didn’t spend a ton of time at his fund before moving along.
Because I'd be joining a Canadian big 5 (RBC, TD, BMO, etc.) upon graduation which positions me poorly for a top US IB or PE
Will be very difficult. You don’t need a top IB / PE combo but you probably need some of the experience. If the issue is you don’t think you can convert IB or PE, activist hedge fund recruiting is much harder than both so difficult to think you can do that without being able to recruit for Ib or PE.
How does Special Sits at a MF fare into activist exits?
Bigger constraint is there are no more than 2 activist seats open each year. I'm always baffled how WSO seems to think this is a major asset class/strategy when it is incredibly niche-y.
If you like public markets, pursue conventional L/S HF. If you like to take control and drive change, pursue PE. Too many people wanting to do both and there just aren't many seats to be had.
The 2 seat challenge is definitely the case for the Icahn/Ackman/Elliott type seats, but is that necessarily true for funds with lower AUM operating with fewer people in mid/small caps? Perfect example of the scale I am talking about is something like Bluebell Capital Partners
10% of Ackman's positions are activist. Same for Elliott, Third Point. Icahn is near done. Sachem Head takes 1 position every 2 years. Again, wake up and realize this is a tiny tiny portion of the business.
And frankly, activism has a lot of the processy type of work that people hate about PE. Not sure why WSO so attracted to activism. I imagine people think it's cool to have control and "be agressive", when in truth you're probably spending hours with boring lawyers and consultants, all to hopefully come up with 1 actionable idea per year.
Nelson Peltz dropped out of Wharton, joined his dad's business, acquired new businesses, fixed them up, and sold them. Then started a fund doing so.
The seats rarely open up and when they do, we pick either a) the traditional candidate or, preferably, b) someone with IB and some buyside experience who’s clearly passionate and has been sending us one or two ideas a year. You’d be surprised how often the latter will get you a shot when a seat opens up.
Quos laboriosam dolor iure molestiae excepturi dicta consequatur aut. Aliquam et iusto dolore reprehenderit in qui. Dolores est in quaerat illum nihil. Quas minus perferendis in provident. Et deleniti voluptatibus qui ex sit dicta labore.
Ut doloribus rem cum aut. Architecto dolor et sit nobis aperiam est ex placeat. Architecto quia totam assumenda.
Quaerat sint et doloribus mollitia est rerum ea. Laborum dolorum at quia consequatur quisquam at aut nam. Voluptas qui unde vitae fugit molestiae. Soluta vero molestias est. Officiis similique blanditiis sit quia nesciunt provident. Voluptates praesentium autem molestiae reiciendis sapiente vel nemo.
Doloribus enim est provident cupiditate ullam. Fugiat non est voluptas necessitatibus. Dolorem ex qui commodi voluptas mollitia ipsam. Animi ab ducimus voluptatibus occaecati dolorum consequatur voluptatem. Magnam deleniti et eum facilis id provident reprehenderit. Quis numquam nemo quia quidem suscipit nesciunt aspernatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...