Curious if anyone had thoughts on the following strategies: L/S vs Event Driven vs Global Macro vs Activist.
Would be helpful to comment on the following: amount of bottoms-up analyses used, transferability of IB coverage skills, career progression between SM and MM, most intellectually stimulating work.
| +170 | Q&A: I'm a Pod PM | 88 | 14h |
| +11 | Should I get an MBA for VC after Tech PM? | 2 | 3d |
| +9 | Stay or leave? | 1 | 2d |
| +7 | Tips for breaking into Macro RV? | 3 | 4h |
| +6 | Lateraling to MM L/S | 1 | 4d |
| +5 | Citadel Pitch Comp | 2 | 15h |
| +3 | Jain | 1 | 1d |
| +2 | Top Books for Hedge Funds Today | 4 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
In my opinion macro funds are the easy answer, but take that with a huge grain of salt as I'm extremely biased.
Because of the ability to invest in several different security types? Attention to large-scale events and their impacts on the country-wide level?
Based on what? I'm not sure I agree with that. Good seats are incredibly rare and very top heavy.
Sed totam et modi perspiciatis architecto nemo suscipit. Qui molestiae velit ipsam et velit cumque voluptatibus. Dolor vel et ut quisquam aut consequatur fuga. Ducimus optio cum architecto iste accusamus qui et. Nobis aut sunt ut voluptates similique ipsam sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...