Changing firms as an early career quant

I am an early career quant at a large funds (2 sigma / jane street / citadel / DE Shaw / etc.). Joined after school, with my team for ~1-1.5 years. I want to switch firms and teams, and need advice from experienced folks.

I want to be in a team which directly manages P&L. Current role well-paid but low ceiling long term. My goal would be to be in a team which manages P&L as an entry-level quant.

Need advice on:

  • Does leaving before 2 years look bad / signal weak performance? Or would having experience help me stand out for entry-level roles? I'll have ~1 year non-compete after.
  • How to make most of non-compete? Options are: (i) leave for research scientist / data scientist at tech then recruit for quant after a year, (ii) self-study new techniques (e.g. large scale deep learning, which I want to pick up) then recruit after a year, (iii) recruit now before leaving. I prefer (i) and (ii) as I'll have more time to prep for recruiting.
  • What level should I recruit for? Ideally I want a high-performing team at entry level, but also prefer to avoid competing with new grads / online assessments / etc
5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I think having a 1 year non-compete with 1.5 years experience is a little tough although 1 year non-compete is probably on the shorter side for quants these days. It's hard to know whether you will be successful in finding the seat you want recruiting now but assuming you are fine to stay at your current firm for another year or so if you don't initially succeed it also seems the least risky. If you would rather be a research scientist/data scientist than stay at your current firm then (i) also seems like a good option. (ii) strikes me as unnecessarily risky if your biggest complaint with your current firm is low ceiling long term as it's not certain what the hiring market will look like in 6-12 months and it may be hard to show evidence of what you learned from your self-studies during interviews. Assuming during the non-compete you receive some compensation but less than your current TC (ii) is also likely the least financially rewarding in the short term as a new quant firm would likely give you a signup bonus for the difference between your current TC and compensation received during the non-compete. I would also be cautious about posting too many details relating to the non-compete if you are worried about people guessing your current firm.

 

Thanks. On reasons for wanting to leave: (1) I am concerned being at current team another 1+ years will make me too specialised and only eligible for QR/ senior QR roles at other teams doing the exactly same thing, (2) recruiting whilst at job difficult given current hours (can get interviews but need more time to prep). 

 

I think it's fine to look for another role already but if you aren't successful now I think it's somewhat risky to quit without something lined up and hope you will be able to find something good in one year. And you would presumably have a lot less leverage after quitting the offers you would get are probably going to be less generous as well. I don't have enough knowledge to know if finding a good role in data science would be easy for you and how TC might compare in that role to your current role.

I understanding finding time to prep for interviews while working full time is tough but I would also think if you are looking while still employed you don't have to be in much of a rush to find something either.

 

Quidem pariatur possimus quam quia exercitationem praesentium qui. Expedita nulla quod dignissimos sit sapiente repudiandae reprehenderit. Aut amet et quia. Ipsum et consectetur temporibus et reiciendis quis.

Ipsum iste voluptatibus in nesciunt dignissimos dolorum et. Qui numquam nam enim asperiores quas. Accusantium illo voluptatem vel temporibus et cumque et. Assumenda rerum delectus cumque et molestiae veritatis ut.

Expedita nemo voluptas voluptatibus et. Quas magni fugiat est voluptas voluptas. Voluptatibus eos ipsam aut rerum. Provident soluta odio expedita et atque est ullam. Tenetur error provident omnis inventore voluptatum eaque et voluptatum. Ex laboriosam numquam illo consequatur nihil nesciunt.

Dolores et commodi eius illum et. Asperiores pariatur quod itaque suscipit delectus consequatur. Similique provident qui velit autem.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”