I was wondering if anyone has some color on this and an idea of how it compares to the big 4 in terms of culture, comp, sector, organization etc.
| +21 | Credit HFs - Long/Short Credit vs. Loan to Own | 4 | 1d |
| +21 | Comp Negotiation - L/S Equity at a Pod | 1 | 1h |
| +17 | How do you get a differentiated view? | 3 | 4d |
| +17 | Tech Public Modeling | 8 | 1d |
| +14 | Am I crazy | 4 | 7h |
| +12 | Q&A: US Power Trader (Prop/HF) | 8 | 3h |
| +6 | LO to HF or HF to LO - which move is easier? | 1 | 1d |
| +6 | Working in HR/Benefits | 2 | 4h |
| 0 | Sharpe ratio for FICC products | 2 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
the current l/s teams returns r very mid but demand for pod products r so hot ig
Are they also pods like product? I had the impression they have generalists?
Credit team is very strong but also not sure how much process/people will carry over, definitely going to be different
contrary to the quant roots, their l/s team is very strong. credit team very mediocre. not really pod structure. very big books because of that.
Ipsa et possimus ut porro. Aut adipisci repellat modi. Laborum praesentium et dolorem porro facere.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...