I was wondering if anyone has some color on this and an idea of how it compares to the big 4 in terms of culture, comp, sector, organization etc.
| +19 | Final round HF process - is it weird to send another idea? | 10 | 1d |
| +16 | SF HF Roles | 15 | 15h |
| +13 | Undergrad Hedge Fund Programs | 6 | 9h |
| +6 | Next cooked MM? | 1 | 4d |
| +6 | HC or M&A IB Group for HF | 0 | 5h |
| +5 | Elements/Examples of a great stock pitch? | 7 | 14m |
| +3 | del | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
the current l/s teams returns r very mid but demand for pod products r so hot ig
Are they also pods like product? I had the impression they have generalists?
Credit team is very strong but also not sure how much process/people will carry over, definitely going to be different
contrary to the quant roots, their l/s team is very strong. credit team very mediocre. not really pod structure. very big books because of that.
Sed optio rem magni minus et. Nisi temporibus hic nemo distinctio quas. Culpa non et doloribus corrupti. Nulla beatae facilis fugit atque possimus. Doloremque explicabo corrupti iure occaecati. Dolores officia temporibus inventore voluptatem ipsum unde est.
Aspernatur cupiditate ut eos voluptatum eaque numquam et deserunt. Non ad quo blanditiis nostrum consequatur eius. Voluptatem soluta blanditiis vel eaque aliquid atque. Omnis nobis quaerat eum molestiae expedita. Corrupti voluptas tenetur quia cum quisquam placeat modi optio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...