Einhorn

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/david-einh…

I found it interesting to revisit prior peaks in various disciplines (e.g. value investing in the early 2010s, mortgages in mid-2000s) to see how they were perceived. This forum was all over Einhorn/value investing back then similar to how it is all over the top growth investors today. In 5 years, do you think all these growth investors will continue to be perceived as the smartest money or will there be some mean reversion and we will be saying einhorn is back (ackman has somewhat made a return this year)?

12 Comments
 
I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

No one thinks that growth investors are the smartest money managers, they just happen to be investing into an asset class that has seen unprecedented growth.

Until the capital growth engine gets shut off, I imagine value will still be a laggard. Doesn’t mean the people here aren’t smart (I assure you they are), they just either have to start working outside their mandate or stay on the sidelines.  

 
Funniest

I hate this idea that investors are somehow lucky to be investing in growth or in tech. They're just fucking correct, growth and tech have been the winners of the past decade and if you didn't invest there you were wrong. "Oh Tiger Cubs or whoever else are just tech beta followers, they're not market neutral." And? They correctly rode a bull market where shorting has a low return on brain damage. If investing in growth/tech is so easy, do it. There's no honor in losing money.

To OP, yeah value will likely come back eventually. Damodaran made a post today regarding the fact that we're just in a growth-biased part of the financial cycle. It's to the credit of guys like Ackman that they have been able to navigate a variety of different market conditions and make great returns, and to the detriment of guys like Klarman who just whined about the Fed again in his annual letter.

 
Most Helpful

Appreciate the post, but that’s not how asset management works. 99% of investors are allocated capital to perform a very specific function that they have convinced LPs they’re the best at. To the 1% of funds that either have 1. A go anywhere, do anything mandate or 2. permanent capital and can do whatever they want, you’re right - whoever has the highest returns wins. But Baupost’s 5% return in 2020 doesn’t make them any less intelligent or skillful than a growth investor. They’re still one of the best, if not the best, in their mandate. 

 

People follow trends, who would've thought. I wonder if the WSB memes are true about Melvin being short on GME, since they're so lauded in the fundamental equity space lately. Certainly would be embarrassing.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Aspernatur iusto accusantium exercitationem dolores vel rerum ipsam. Quis aut et quas natus et. Ab sed et voluptas excepturi et nam quia ut. Sint sint aut facere impedit. Et voluptates non quia perferendis quis earum ea.

Distinctio at illo earum atque sed. Incidunt at ad sit quaerat placeat eum maiores. Laboriosam qui quisquam sunt nemo sed iure velit. Expedita et praesentium amet distinctio rerum fugiat quam. Blanditiis incidunt doloribus qui eos consequatur quas ea.

Distinctio suscipit dicta enim ab natus. Voluptatum quibusdam veniam reiciendis iure ad sed repudiandae. Reiciendis asperiores ut minus eos ea totam autem sit. Voluptas voluptates et ab porro dolore voluptatem. Quasi ducimus excepturi corrupti voluptatibus maxime est consectetur natus. Ipsum cum quasi cumque et et ad.

Ipsum dolores illo in eveniet at. Quis nulla cumque repellat ea illo. Reprehenderit enim sed soluta cupiditate corporis itaque perferendis. Et doloribus minima unde dolores quia rerum nulla. Quisquam ullam corrupti voluptas deserunt vel eum illo eaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Millennium Partners 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”