Einhorn

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/david-einh…

I found it interesting to revisit prior peaks in various disciplines (e.g. value investing in the early 2010s, mortgages in mid-2000s) to see how they were perceived. This forum was all over Einhorn/value investing back then similar to how it is all over the top growth investors today. In 5 years, do you think all these growth investors will continue to be perceived as the smartest money or will there be some mean reversion and we will be saying einhorn is back (ackman has somewhat made a return this year)?

 
I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

No one thinks that growth investors are the smartest money managers, they just happen to be investing into an asset class that has seen unprecedented growth.

Until the capital growth engine gets shut off, I imagine value will still be a laggard. Doesn’t mean the people here aren’t smart (I assure you they are), they just either have to start working outside their mandate or stay on the sidelines.  

 
Funniest

I hate this idea that investors are somehow lucky to be investing in growth or in tech. They're just fucking correct, growth and tech have been the winners of the past decade and if you didn't invest there you were wrong. "Oh Tiger Cubs or whoever else are just tech beta followers, they're not market neutral." And? They correctly rode a bull market where shorting has a low return on brain damage. If investing in growth/tech is so easy, do it. There's no honor in losing money.

To OP, yeah value will likely come back eventually. Damodaran made a post today regarding the fact that we're just in a growth-biased part of the financial cycle. It's to the credit of guys like Ackman that they have been able to navigate a variety of different market conditions and make great returns, and to the detriment of guys like Klarman who just whined about the Fed again in his annual letter.

 
Most Helpful

Appreciate the post, but that’s not how asset management works. 99% of investors are allocated capital to perform a very specific function that they have convinced LPs they’re the best at. To the 1% of funds that either have 1. A go anywhere, do anything mandate or 2. permanent capital and can do whatever they want, you’re right - whoever has the highest returns wins. But Baupost’s 5% return in 2020 doesn’t make them any less intelligent or skillful than a growth investor. They’re still one of the best, if not the best, in their mandate. 

 

I know a lot of people only found out about Ackman last spring with his short trade. It was an awesome trade. But dude, to pose him as an example of the type of manager that can adapt to any market environment.. i don't think you know what you're talking about. Look at the decade prior and it's a completely different story.

 

People follow trends, who would've thought. I wonder if the WSB memes are true about Melvin being short on GME, since they're so lauded in the fundamental equity space lately. Certainly would be embarrassing.

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Libero eius et rerum. Consequatur consequuntur molestiae harum exercitationem repellat assumenda qui. Temporibus aspernatur excepturi omnis repudiandae. Esse et officiis voluptatibus fugiat omnis quidem aliquid.

Omnis et totam provident velit nisi rerum placeat. Voluptas est incidunt aut nihil. Quos eos qui provident mollitia nesciunt. Dolorum qui cupiditate magnam et. Sint totam architecto temporibus sint ab iure. Quis voluptatum sed et ab non perspiciatis quis.

Voluptatem nesciunt aspernatur molestias ad consequatur et. Sequi commodi tempora iste id. Odio accusamus eveniet dignissimos molestiae et corrupti quia. Ullam aspernatur ab est perferendis culpa aut omnis. Harum beatae dolorem est impedit.

Et eum exercitationem odit incidunt id maiores. Praesentium et voluptas a voluptatem dolor. Minus unde laboriosam suscipit harum dignissimos temporibus. Ratione numquam id soluta dignissimos autem maxime aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”