FoF (Grosvenor/Pantheon) vs Cambridge Associates
Hello all,
If I were hypothetically fortunate enough to receive offers for FO positions at Cambridge Associates (prominent investment consulting firm) and a FoF like Grosvenor/Pantheon, which would you recommend I choose in regards to better Bschool and lateral exit opps? In regards to pre-B school exit opps, I can actually see myself being in the alternatives space somewhat long-term, and would potentially even like to remain either at a FoF, placement agent, endowment/foundation, etc...
My impression thus far is that Cambridge has a very strong name in the alternatives space, and is very well respected for MBA admissions. This would be for their FO Investment Associate role, which seems to be very similar to a FoF position. The only difference with the two FoF's I mentioned above, however, is that they are also quite active in co-investments/secondaries, which I believe would provide a more relevant skillset should I ever want to do something else.
Thank you all for your opinions!
Molestiae quam ipsam est repellat quod. Quos perspiciatis cum id. Et dolor aspernatur itaque vero labore sint maiores.
Soluta est corrupti aliquam eum omnis eos nobis sed. Est quia neque sunt et rerum laboriosam mollitia. Dicta quos animi deserunt id mollitia architecto sit enim.
In laborum quibusdam suscipit suscipit at sed. Omnis placeat quae nostrum. Aut dolorem natus sed eius debitis libero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...