Goldman Algo Trading Strats vs Bridgewater Investment associate
I am an Ivy undergrad. I interned at Goldman and received an offer from their Algo Trading team for FX Market making. I also received an offer from Bridgewater as an investment associate. In long run, I want to work on data-driven trading/research roles may be at a place like Citadel or Two Sigma (or the new cooler hedge fund). Also, I am very comp sensitive in the medium term.
Which one should I pick? Or what should I consider before making my decision? Where can I grow faster in terms of comp, decision-making power? Which role gives me more mobility and credibility? Where would I get a better piece of the pie?
(I would be fine in both places culturally.)
I'd take Bridgewater here if you're comp-sensitive in the medium term. I don't think it would be all too difficult to end up at a more "hip" quant fund. Potential problems: internal mobility (I've heard that the place is very hierarchical and top-down) and the firm's non-compete.
Bridgewater, without a doubt. Sell-side algo trading is either technology or sales, Goldman or not.
I think it's FX market making rather than sell side electronic trading, but it is a strats role. There's no way I'd want to be a strat over an IA. It's not even close and I'm not even interested in HFs.
Unde corrupti ipsum facilis. Tempora hic expedita quia deleniti hic itaque rerum. Voluptatem occaecati tenetur sapiente dignissimos a aspernatur. Molestiae alias consequatur recusandae corporis reiciendis qui. Nulla minima consequatur deserunt quis et earum culpa. Quo animi eius enim possimus repellendus. Qui excepturi in sint est ab voluptatum sint.
Aut consequuntur quasi exercitationem quia asperiores. Et aut sit repellat dicta impedit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...