17 Comments
 
Most Helpful

if pairs / mkt neutral trading didn't work, pod shops wouldn't exist...

Allocator here. Having seen tons of track records on a monthly basis (and continuing to do so) most shops shouldn’t exist based on their track. Shame on LPs (my counterparts and me).  Expanding long/short equity for a bunch of pod shops is just an easy way to soak up excess capital that we shower upon funds, especially the pods. Often it’s dilutive to returns, but once you lock up capital or convince LPs, they rarely pull their capital for years (or ever) unless the sh** hits the fan. 
 

People across this business (financial services) generally are not geniuses or original in any way especially in public markets since anything really unique that works is sniffed out and copied quickly. This is not to say people aren’t gifted or smart by any means, however…

OP- good question. Keep up the curiosity. IMO it’s what this board is for. 

I used to do Asia-Pacific PE (kind of like FoF). Now I do something else but happy to try and answer questions on that stuff.
 

Retail monkey aka me used to combine Nasdaq (long) with Dax (German index, short) some years ago. Quite often you saw Nasdaq rising and Dax followed, if “weakness” in Nasdaq, Dax suffered as well

Was not really based upon model or so, just monkey see monkey do

 

I find pair trades come from an understanding of certain sectors and how the companies within them compete against each other or how their strategies may differ.

.

For example if you look at the publicly traded exchange companies (NDAQ, ICE, CME, et al) they're viewed as a group but there is a lot of dispersion in the paths and strategies they're pursuing (which means forward returns will be driven by different catalysts). Over the last few years ICE has increased their exposure to the US housing market meanwhile NDAQ has increased their exposure to software being sold into financial institutions. Maybe you think existing home sales are going to spike which would be positive for ICE and you could use its as a long against one of the less attractive exchanges. Maybe you think IT budgets at financial institutions are gong to be pressured which would be negative for NDAQ and you could use it as a short against one of the more attractive exchanges.

.

Identify the different exposures within a peer group so you can decide if any are exploitable

 

Instead of betting on themes to play out, why don’t you just pair trade two companies in the same industry that are having vastly different performance/one is nailing KPIs one isn’t.

Think like long Costco short Big Lots over the last year or long Chipotle short Chuy’s or Papa John’s.

 Studying financial performances of these companies and purchasing companies with the possibility of earnings growth/multiple expansion and shorting overpriced or struggling enterprises seems a bit more controllable than trying to predict macro themes which may play out in 3 months, 9 months, or never play out as you’d expect.

 

This got SBd? What youre talking about is massively tilting Quality/Crowded Longs against Crowded Shorts with very high days to cover. Easy way to get fired quickly.

Ok take something that's not an obvious short and then instead pair a great long with a more mature, steady business that you're expecting to not perform as well as the long. I'm thinking a mature company like Coke or Ford that can be hedged against a faster grower like Domino's or Stellantis.

 

Sint delectus eos provident nam optio sit voluptatem. Delectus consequatur incidunt odit laboriosam. Exercitationem reiciendis doloremque possimus illo velit. Consequatur voluptatem soluta dolores aut et commodi.

Vel dolorem culpa quia velit et aperiam ut corrupti. Labore mollitia accusamus ex voluptatem unde. Et voluptas minima et facilis voluptas expedita. Delectus repellat tenetur est ipsum voluptatem ratione molestiae quas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (233) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”