How hard to raise Fund of Funds?

Break even is about 20-25m, sub managers already picked out. Should I go for an anchor LP first or instead just spend the money on legal and start raising and generating returns?The cap constrain is $500M, then the strategy might have to add more partners. I’m also fine with accredited investors but want a lockup from like a $500k-$1M investment.QP and institutional definitely more leeway they generally know what they are doing. Wave management fee on first 25m anchors seems to be a good incentive?

12 Comments
 

If you can and have the balls be your own anchor so to speak. If you can set up the legal and have everything done, that makes finding an anchor LP that much easier. It’s a big confidence signal for an LP to see you are already up and running and generating real returns. They like to see winners who would win even without them and then they can just throw in some money and ride coattails.


Good luck 🍀 

 

I think the better question would be - what makes you a better fund to write to vs any other FoF that's already well-established and has access to top funds and by extension the talent that's exiting to start new ones? It's going to be hard af no matter what you're raising a fund for, but I feel like it'd almost be harder for an new FoF than a new HF because at least for the latter you'd assume the person has a good enough track record to think they can do it in the first place vs you've already admitted above you're not rich, so you can't exactly have a track record to have been investing in multiple managers in a way that could speak to your capability as a FoF manager. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

I used to work with a lot of these single managers who would be the sub funds. They manage institutional money, and I got some weird idiosyncratic and completely not market related alpha strategy that funds would like.

Just want to do a smaller raise, $25M seems like the break even check size. The sub funds all have 20+ year track records which is nice.

 

At that size idk if I'd even call it a fund, more like a 1-off (diversified?) investment vehicle. My question then becomes why would these managers want your money vs just go to some bigger fund that can write bigger checks? Could they even take bigger checks or are these very small, niche operations they're running? Who are the LPs you'd be pitching to? Because this is too small for institutional, maybe a fit for smaller regional wealth managers or something. If there's genuine alpha to be had that you can explicitly lay out to LPs as to why it's better for them to invest with you, I suppose I could see it working out. But I'd have a lot more questions... Regardless, good luck! 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

I misunderstood the original post, thought you were looking to ask FOHFs for capital, rather than actually launch and raise a FoHFs.

It's a highly uncommon situation. If you can provide access to hard-to-access HFs, it could work. Like some others have mentioned, it's weird why they'd choose to partner with you when given their track they probably have easier and more meaningful ways to raise capital. Ultimately you'll know better than us what they see in you that makes it worth it for them.

 

Repudiandae id sed error aut. Odio voluptate et consequatur vero porro voluptas. Dolores assumenda aut qui et ullam quasi numquam dolor. Quibusdam cumque ut perspiciatis praesentium modi numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”