Hey guys - how hard is it to go from a boutique LO shop covering a specific area of coverage to a tier 1 pod shop. 1 year of IB experience and then a few years at this LO. Pay has been stagnating and I want more upside. Is this a tough thing to do?
| +18 | Learning about Event Driven | 2 | 6d |
| +14 | What the fuck do I do now? | 8 | 1d |
| +12 | How do people lie their pnl? | 2 | 3h |
| +4 | Info on Steadview Capital? | 1 | 4d |
| +3 | Jane Street Strategy & Product Internship Interview | 1 | 5d |
| +2 | best path to pod? | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Transitioning from a boutique long-only (LO) shop to a tier 1 hedge fund (HF) pod shop can be challenging but not impossible. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key considerations:
Skillset Alignment:
Hedge funds, especially tier 1 pod shops, value candidates with strong analytical skills, a deep understanding of their coverage area, and the ability to generate alpha. If your experience at the LO shop has given you a track record of identifying successful investment ideas and a solid understanding of your sector, you may have a strong foundation.
Networking:
Breaking into a tier 1 pod shop often requires leveraging your network. Since you have IB experience and a few years at the LO, you should focus on connecting with professionals in the HF space, particularly those in your coverage area. Headhunters can also play a significant role in facilitating this transition.
Challenges:
Upside Potential:
The upside at a tier 1 pod shop can be substantial, with higher pay and performance-based bonuses. However, the risk is also higher, as underperformance can lead to quick exits.
Action Plan:
While the transition is competitive, with the right preparation and networking, it is achievable.
Sources: Demystify the LT SM / tiger cub / "PE approach" vs. MMHF / pod shops?, L/S vs LO from a non-monetary perspective, Why did you take a job at a small boutique?, Regional Boutiques are vastly overlooked in IB
SM HF analyst thinking about moving to an LO for 2-3 years to get better mentorship here. From what many senior PMs I go to for advice on the move are telling me, you should be fine as long as you come from a strong LO and know your sector very well (think 20 to 50 names you can trade well on a 3 to 12 month horizon across a sector and its value chain). I also hear that many platform PMs want LO candidates since they have really strong fundamental capabilities. A friend showed me a list of PMs and what kind of candidates they are looking for at a very "tradey" type platform, and almost all explicitly state that they are open to LO candidates, and some of the more directional PMs actually seem to prefer these. Other than that, what I hear is that many LO candidates are really strong on a 12 to 24 month horizon but struggle to trade quarters, and that's where many fail at the case study or pitching stage, so I would make sure to work on that. Other than that, given the turnover at platforms, I'm sure your time will come, so just be patient and prepared, and find a good recruiter who can help you in the process.
You are incredibly off in how you think most MM PMs perceive LOs.
"Really strong fundamental capabilities" is something you could convince me PE guys are perceived as having. LOs are seen as lazy, slow, and lacking in market-savvy.
A quick linkedin search will show you that all big MMs employ a large number of ex LO guys as analysts, PMs or even senior PMs. Citadel and P72very famously prefer LO candidates, and so do many fundamental teams at BAM and MLP. Absolutely everyone in the industry knows that. I’m guessing you’re either a 2+2 guy who didn’t make last a year at a MM or a salty student who got rejected by Fidelity? Kinda pathetic either way.
Aut et repudiandae dolor maiores et. Rem aperiam delectus hic est iure illo vero ut.
Molestiae rerum ut fuga vitae repellendus et pariatur error. Nihil voluptatem autem molestiae dicta praesentium aperiam sunt qui.
Velit eius eum quae. Qui fugiat laboriosam est omnis distinctio nulla a repellendus. Ut vel qui recusandae maiores culpa et. Consectetur nisi quidem aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Sit voluptates aut et. Voluptatibus consequatur rem harum dolore. Explicabo omnis nihil ut doloremque vel magnam non. Consequatur alias eius qui eveniet.