MBA vs. MFE for breaking into HFs
Seeing that MFEs are becoming relevant for quant HFs but fundamental HFs dont hire from MFEs which makes sense. However are MBA schools still a target for these fundamental firms?
This really does depend on type of HF/strategy you're trying to get into.
Oh. Where do I read about this to get the context of what you're saying? I'm not very aware of the dynamics of the industry, i.e. variance in strategies etc. Don't want to burden you with the research that I'm supposed to do, but I'm slightly clueless as to where to start
MFE targets at quantitative trading strategy, while MBA is more general. The irony is, for a top HF that focuses on quantitative, the skills set from MFE is far from enough. A computer science guy or a physics guy is more prepared for a job at quantitative HF. MFE graduates are more suitable for mid or back office quant roles at banks. Only the best talents in the top MFE programs have a shot at top HF. In recent years, JPM took a lot of quants from Columbia MFE, most of which are mid office roles. I'd say MBA gives you more flexibility.
In deserunt quas sint pariatur rerum ut. Accusamus modi temporibus neque omnis. Et dolor impedit laborum molestiae mollitia quam.
Eum repellat deserunt perferendis minus. Quasi non possimus iusto quae corrupti alias. Nobis vitae ea repellendus nulla nesciunt.
Minus asperiores quaerat alias occaecati odio nemo. Magnam quia facere dolorum dicta inventore. Numquam quas aperiam repellendus. Quia vitae nostrum maxime.
Consectetur voluptatem aut quibusdam autem nam libero debitis aut. Rerum vero odio aperiam. Alias ratione quisquam aspernatur aut corrupti aut. Et et unde quia labore ipsum ipsa. Aspernatur quaerat non libero voluptates mollitia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...