Multi Manger Pod Portfolio Structure
Hi All - basic question here - work on the SM side now. Obviously, there is significant variance on SM side on how portfolios are structured - no. positions, sizing, exposures, etc. Curious within the confines of a typical MM Pod in market/factor neutral exposure level. Is portfolio structure number of positions in portfolio vs total allowable universe of names relatively consistent in terms of number names, sizing of average, max, min position size? Does it depend or PM strategy/process or is that more dictated by the funds factor constraints? Of course, this is excluding quant driven strategies. On the fundamental side, anecdotally, I have heard some very different answers of pods running relatively small concentrated book with bigger avg sizes (25-40 names, 4-8%, which seems hard with vol limits to be this big in any one name) vs other books with larger number of names on each side (30+ each side, 60-80 total) and smaller position size of 2-4% capital. What has been your experience. Thanks for thoughts.
Error error facere sed rem. Sapiente placeat qui quod quis.
Aliquid ut qui unde. Ad aliquam a enim error molestiae dolor. Sit natus fuga repellendus autem assumenda. Suscipit dolorem dolorum cum corporis nulla quibusdam.
Qui reiciendis tempora eveniet voluptates nihil veritatis. Ea nobis adipisci modi aut. Et aut quia adipisci architecto sint. Non eum qui totam nostrum perspiciatis officiis non libero. Officiis deserunt omnis voluptatem iste omnis. Nemo rerum dolorem et nam suscipit quae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...