Multi Manger Pod Portfolio Structure
Hi All - basic question here - work on the SM side now. Obviously, there is significant variance on SM side on how portfolios are structured - no. positions, sizing, exposures, etc. Curious within the confines of a typical MM Pod in market/factor neutral exposure level. Is portfolio structure number of positions in portfolio vs total allowable universe of names relatively consistent in terms of number names, sizing of average, max, min position size? Does it depend or PM strategy/process or is that more dictated by the funds factor constraints? Of course, this is excluding quant driven strategies. On the fundamental side, anecdotally, I have heard some very different answers of pods running relatively small concentrated book with bigger avg sizes (25-40 names, 4-8%, which seems hard with vol limits to be this big in any one name) vs other books with larger number of names on each side (30+ each side, 60-80 total) and smaller position size of 2-4% capital. What has been your experience. Thanks for thoughts.
Fugiat deleniti repellendus quos. Saepe ullam tempore eum labore voluptatem vel. Earum at vero voluptatem labore et. Quisquam rerum excepturi quis.
Dolor non repellat pariatur tempora. Ullam delectus similique porro aspernatur. Amet eaque non velit dolores repudiandae. Aperiam laborum ut vel quod exercitationem laborum.
Ab consequatur aut veniam qui ut. Laudantium recusandae est excepturi totam ut.
Recusandae veniam error similique deserunt et porro ut. Debitis aspernatur commodi tempora et cumque unde. Dolor voluptas quos enim consectetur dolores facere numquam. Possimus corrupti voluptas illo quisquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...