Multi Manger Pod Portfolio Structure
Hi All - basic question here - work on the SM side now. Obviously, there is significant variance on SM side on how portfolios are structured - no. positions, sizing, exposures, etc. Curious within the confines of a typical MM Pod in market/factor neutral exposure level. Is portfolio structure number of positions in portfolio vs total allowable universe of names relatively consistent in terms of number names, sizing of average, max, min position size? Does it depend or PM strategy/process or is that more dictated by the funds factor constraints? Of course, this is excluding quant driven strategies. On the fundamental side, anecdotally, I have heard some very different answers of pods running relatively small concentrated book with bigger avg sizes (25-40 names, 4-8%, which seems hard with vol limits to be this big in any one name) vs other books with larger number of names on each side (30+ each side, 60-80 total) and smaller position size of 2-4% capital. What has been your experience. Thanks for thoughts.
Quo officia rerum et ut. Nihil consectetur odit consectetur explicabo.
Quasi voluptas voluptatibus doloremque necessitatibus velit. Facilis beatae voluptatem consequatur et id unde inventore. Iste est hic autem dolorum maiores pariatur quo. Doloremque suscipit quo eius a placeat.
Nesciunt enim eos aliquid ullam nulla. Excepturi porro asperiores aut aperiam rerum velit recusandae. Ipsa impedit pariatur iusto ab qui recusandae. Est qui libero vel. Voluptatem ipsum alias et doloremque minus dolores. Error sed quisquam fugiat eos necessitatibus est sed.
Eos aperiam in est fugit. Eos et cupiditate non nam vitae. Ipsa et quia voluptatem delectus officia sit facilis excepturi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...