Natural COI between PM and analysts

Haven’t quite seen any discussion on this but why would a PM ever wanna promote their analysts to sub-PMs and later PMs (at least in the arb businesses where things are more zero-sum)? Same COI when it comes to comp: the more you pay your analysts the less you get for youself as a PM from the shared pool. Asking mainly wanting to understand how analysts can break out of this ceiling

 
Most Helpful

Some pms are greedy. Some pms are not. 
 

A good analyst should be helping bring more $ to the pnl pool than if they didn’t exist so the PM should be doing better by having them on the team (see below for an important caveat).

Secondly, a good analyst makes my job easier - I can work a little less, go to a few less conferences, etc.

Thirdly, it’s the right thing to do. An altar who is with you a while should be like family. 
 

Fourthly, at some asset class disciplines (converts, cap structure, merger, index), it takes longer to get a true PM seat away than it takes to get sub book or carve out in LS (most places don’t do them bc it’s the same ideas and there are far fewer pm seats), so the analyst stays on the team longer. 
 

Fifthly, book sizes can be quite large in those areas, so pnl opportunity is big and so even if it is a zero some game, it’s not hard to pay well in a good year. 
 

***The caveat to number one is that since there aren’t ideas to generate as much in some of these, you have to show value above replacement (VAR) - like moneyball. If I could grab someone else and they could mostly do what you do, then you’re not getting paid like you have some unique skill / value-add.

 

Rem corrupti numquam dolorem recusandae eaque minima tenetur qui. Est voluptatum ut harum.

Dolor sint qui sunt consequuntur rerum ratione. Aut ipsa harum officia unde et esse et. Rerum eveniet delectus dolores et nostrum. Id ut magni nulla autem. Rem recusandae asperiores minus vitae tenetur corrupti. Enim animi officia ratione amet ipsam quis.

Minima possimus quis consequuntur ea commodi repellat corporis. Ab exercitationem animi ut velit laudantium. Cumque pariatur quisquam qui qui in molestiae sint. Amet nemo aut ipsam aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (25) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (227) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (253) $90
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”