Proprietary Algorithm to Predict Likelihood of FDA Approval

Hello everyone,

I founded a company that is developing a proprietary algorithm that predicts likelihood of FDA approval based on public clinical data and other factors. We're interviewing hundreds of physicians, biostatisticians and former regulatory professionals to make the algorithm as precise as possible and the results we're getting are very encouraging.

I was wondering how valuable would the probabilities of FDA approval generated by this algorithms be to hedge funds and other institutional investors?

I am thinking of setting it up as subscription service where subscribers would receive on a weekly basis the probabilities generated by the algorithm for all upcoming FDA decisions for a given time range.

How much would HFs be willing to pay (after a 1-month free trial) for this subscription service?

Thanks!

 
Most Helpful

Personally, I’m a bit skeptical of the product having commercial success given the number of moving parts associated with getting a drug through clinical trials. For example, how would you factor in the FDA randomnly shifting the goal post on what they consider for bar of approval? How would you account for trials that may not have hit statistical signifiance but could get approved based on FDA’s leniency? How would you account for companies massaging open-label data that would inevitably miss in a placebo-controlled trial? There’s a long list of occurences that are more common that not that would be counterintuitive to the generalist investor or everyday person, which could be tough to assess.

I would say most of the biotech/healthcare-dedicated funds would have no interest in this type of technology because they simply wouldn’t trust it and instead have their own PhDs, statisticians, and doctors to calculate the PoS. I second the point above that there’s a reason these funds have dedicated KOLs and scientific advisory boards, typically under exclusivity. I also think you underestimate how subjective healthcare investing is - there are many drugs that had subpar data, yet got approved through different means (i.e. patient advocacy groups); “75% PoS” on its own means little without the context, so I think your best bet would be someone more quant-oriented as opposed to your fundamental investors.

 

I once heard a lecture by the former CEO of Quantopian who said someone asks a variant of your question ("How much would a hedge fund pay for my algo that predicts XYZ?") every week and he always says the answer is nothing, nothing, nothing at all!!!!

First, nobody would buy your model unless you can prove it works, and it's very hard to prove it works without giving them the source code (and still hard to prove even then). You mention a 1-month free trial, but there aren't very many interesting FDA approvals in a given month, so a one month trial won't convince anybody.

But more importantly -- even if you can prove your algorithm really does work with, say, 99% accuracy, ***that alone is not enough to justify anyone paying for it*** cause you haven't yet proven this leads to more profits than I'm already getting on my own. Hedge funds are already making their own predictions of this and they've gotten good at it. Their predictions are already X% accurate. Your model may be, say, 99% accurate; but do you know the accuracy of what funds are already doing without your model? Are you sure their manual process isn't already nearly as good as your model? Cause if it is, then why would they need your model?  You need to show not only that you are good, but also that you are significantly better than what they already have. And that is much much harder. 

 

Tempore placeat ex cumque dolorem veniam praesentium. Praesentium qui qui in. Nulla rerum voluptatem earum cupiditate dolorem eos aspernatur laborum. Saepe ipsa ipsa rerum quia.

Ipsam delectus ut eum accusamus. Accusantium perspiciatis eligendi sunt et aut itaque tenetur.

Magnam fugiat ut occaecati dolorem suscipit odio qui. Adipisci aut voluptatem architecto.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”