"Quantamental" firms?

I've heard the buzzword thrown about a bit to describe specific teams at some MM shops and P72 thinks they are quantamental but I'm skeptical the academy really has true "quant" involved. Do people know of firms that are embracing the combination of quant trading and fundamental research is a legitimate way?

39 Comments
 

this would be considered quantamental in the industry. Like I mentioned above, either you come from the quant side and basically still trying to automate everything and use the alternative datasets as a source of predictive features or you come from the fundamental side and the alternative data sets are used to provide new themes or variant perception on certain names.

 
Most Helpful

Even though the question is more around hedge funds in the US, I thought it might be beneficial to explain what is quant and fundamental in how I manage my portfolio, which is classed as "quantamental" product at my firm (long only).

It's quite a fluid term, different people define it in different ways. I came from the fundamental side, so my quant skills are not great to begin with. In my case, the quant part has nothing to do with quant trading, complex ML algos nor alternative data sets. In fact, the alternative data sets I only use to form/check some fundamental hypothesis on some names I hold (I consider that part of the fundamental area - and most people will).

So, the quant stuff. I use it in 2 places, screening/alpha testing and optimization/risk management. For screening, I pick fundamental metrics based on research and back testing and then assign alpha scores to stocks based on these metrics. This is how I create my investible universe. For risk management, as my portfolio is quite diversified, I use a quant optimizer to reduce any unwanted factor risks or exposures (or increase exposures I want to from fundamental research).

Most of the work in between screening and optimization is fundamental research. This is how I pick names, sectors, countries, and weights.

 

screening is very common. Many fundamental investors have written books on this so I wouldn't consider it quantamental.

second part, more and more fundamental groups have been using, though generally they outsource it to a quant consultancy. Interesting though that you do this at a long only. Generally, fundamental shops that are long only or SM have fairly concentrated portfolios and an optimizer doesn't usually give you much. Add to this the longer holding periods also means a lot of the risks you hedge out change their correlations etc its usually used for a stat arb portfolio.

Btw, have you seen an added benefit from the portfolio optimization?

 

Yeah, I agree on the screening front, both sides use it. But coming from the fundamental side, the complexity of the screening is higher on the quantamental portfolios (and you do more back testing, which I didn't really do on the fundamental side).

My portfolio is more diversified than a typical fundamental portfolio, so realistically I can't manually optimize for various exposures, hence the quant optimizer. I definitely see an added benefit in that I don't breach any tracking error limits or overweights, so that's more on the risk side. But managing my tracking error while keeping my alpha increases my information ratio, which is the key metric I'm evaluated on.

 

Beatae sed et quasi aut fugit quos possimus. Rerum eligendi a earum dolor perferendis numquam. Et voluptas inventore atque et velit. Aut voluptas quia qui eius. Optio vel culpa earum voluptatem accusantium iusto est laborum.

Soluta maxime repudiandae exercitationem fugit aperiam dolore quo. Ullam qui quas quia reprehenderit magnam. Dolor optio cumque nihil pariatur quia facere. Iure omnis voluptatem quos sit deserunt id.

Impedit laboriosam accusantium deleniti dolor. Totam non dolor est natus corrupti delectus et. Eos natus ea doloremque reprehenderit commodi dolores nulla.

 

Vel excepturi similique repudiandae aut tempore eaque. Sit esse dolor ut quidem. Qui sed sequi assumenda voluptatem explicabo et. Ullam eius aspernatur nobis numquam qui quibusdam error. Architecto suscipit vel debitis libero ut ducimus.

Esse et commodi eaque itaque. Dolores voluptas cupiditate quam aperiam recusandae voluptatem omnis. Assumenda voluptatem enim molestiae.

Quidem enim et quis dolores aliquid. Iure deleniti molestiae est commodi magnam. Repudiandae nostrum rerum quis perspiciatis.

Nesciunt id eveniet earum at provident impedit natus inventore. Corrupti officiis consequatur ipsam velit. Qui veritatis suscipit quaerat dolorum delectus magnam magnam. Explicabo beatae et numquam doloribus aut ea. Eveniet maiores sapiente fugiat et alias fugiat. Ut maxime qui ipsam maxime sunt non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”