Quantitative Research vs. Quantitative Trader Prestige
Just curious as to what is viewed as more prestigious and difficult to get into than the other. I know that at some shops they don't differentiate between the two, but for those that do, what is viewed as more lucrative?
Whichever role that will get you to manage your own pnl book
At firms that have both, usually the quantitative researcher is the more prestigious/lucrative role. These firms tend to have three key roles: quant trader, software developer, and quant researcher.
The researcher will come up with signal ideas (often has a phd), the dev will write the execution code, and the trader will monitor execution of the strategy/often comes up with ideas/improvements based on what they are seeing in the market.
This is not the case with all firms, but is the case for many HFT firms and quant hedge funds.
At HF/AM, traders do execution and researchers work on strategies, and the latter is a better role. At prop/HFT shops, a trader is like a PM and is a better role than a researcher. The titles are often arbitrary and not really comparable across firms. The good jobs get an explicit portion of either their own returns or the overall fund returns, regardless of the title. Also, the difficulty of getting a job has surprisingly little to do with how much a job pays.
Can you expand on your point ”Also, the difficulty of getting a job has surprisingly little to do with how much a job pays.”?
It's incredibly hard to get a top IBD or even transaction advisory job now, but if you go to a Master of FinEngineering program, it's relatively easy to for you to become a quant researcher (not necessarily a BB or big- buyside). You are likely to get paid very well being a quant researcher while ou may work a lot and get paid the same/lower in a corporate finance job --- and the latter can be harder to break in.
Qui amet rem beatae voluptatibus assumenda eaque. Exercitationem natus eum laudantium illo et. Quia laborum quidem mollitia ut aut necessitatibus. Maiores labore reprehenderit aut eum non omnis dolorum delectus.
Autem aut ipsum fugiat atque temporibus. Labore qui beatae mollitia magni. Est occaecati aut aut laudantium in. Tempora consequatur rem nulla eius aperiam ut tenetur ducimus. Veritatis et consequuntur dicta aut non nobis.
Ipsa distinctio fuga culpa doloremque autem. Beatae illum aut aspernatur qui suscipit modi odio. Consequuntur autem voluptates ad ad sunt veritatis. Quasi consequatur quos sed ratione similique quaerat corrupti cumque.
Quo porro et laboriosam odio neque corrupti dolor provident. Dolor qui similique voluptate qui dolores voluptas natus. Fugiat nihil pariatur ea et itaque consequatur cumque. Aut quasi consequatur cumque quia qui aut. Dolores velit et pariatur et. Aut nemo quia esse nemo magnam magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...