Recruiting diverse associates

Hi guys:

As topic suggests - I'm running our firm's associate recruiting process and would love to understand what are some best practices to use to recruit more diverse candidates. A few issues we've experienced:

1.  "In network" candidates hear about the positions first; as a result, by the time the job description has been distributed through our diverse network partners, their candidates are already "late"

2. Concept of "fit" - people always feel more invested in candidates that share a similar path / past - same sports / schools etc. Difficult to dispel that when most of the partners are the same and like the same people

3. High demand for diverse candidates that came from IB/PE path: these candidates are rare and highly sought after, and just not that available for every firm

I'm curious on if anyone has suggestions on how to work through 1/2 and limit their adverse impact?

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful
Associate 1 in PE - LBOs

Hi guys:

As topic suggests - I'm running our firm's associate recruiting process and would love to understand what are some best practices to use to recruit more diverse candidates. A few issues we've experienced:

1.  "In network" candidates hear about the positions first; as a result, by the time the job description has been distributed through our diverse network partners, their candidates are already "late"

  1. Concept of "fit" - people always feel more invested in candidates that share a similar path / past - same sports / schools etc. Difficult to dispel that when most of the partners are the same and like the same people
  1. High demand for diverse candidates that came from IB/PE path: these candidates are rare and highly sought after, and just not that available for every firm

I'm curious on if anyone has suggestions on how to work through 1/2 and limit their adverse impact?

For 1, that's a what's "in network" issue for you, not a bureaucracy / distribution issue.  If you are serious about bringing in diverse talent through diverse network partners, you should be more engaging with them rather than using them as just a job board. If you were truly engaging with them, they would be a part of your network hearing about these jobs first.  

 

When most of the partners are the same and are inclined to the same people why would a diversity candidate choose your company. If diversity is looking to check a box instead of being a founding company principle, it’s a bit like an obese person trying to get fit. Sure it’s possible but it’s that much more difficult. Point 2 makes me ask if the team really wants a candidate that looks different from the same culture instead of real diversity from a different culture or sexual orientation. I’m sure there are diversity networks to engage with and high performers that could be targeted for recruiting.

 

For number 1, it sounds like you just need better processes such as setting deadlines for resumes, dates for interviews, application process for all candidates, etc. That way candidates can't skip the line. Even if they are recommended internally, they still interview at the same time as everyone else and still have to go through a rigid and well-defined process.

 

Lol this diversity shit is unbelievable, everything about this just screams PR. No mentioning or even inclination at all of hiring for differing thought processes or aptitude, just all about that diversity stamp. Nice

Also, what's up with the "limiting their adverse impact" line? Sounds like you're asking how to minimize the damage of the output by hiring for "diversity" rather than skill. Hahaha just out there saying it now I guess, nice. Go ESG

 

Aut deserunt dolorum asperiores quia unde eaque nisi. Eos aperiam quibusdam fugiat repudiandae ut. Repudiandae rerum occaecati qui molestiae accusamus laudantium rem perspiciatis. Architecto necessitatibus quia aut assumenda ad vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”