hi monkey,
I have been reading wso lately, and I was able to see different cases in which rx groups place better for hf compared to m&a.
is this true because of the more technicality that characterises rx, or am I just wrong?
| +49 | Do Quantamental roles really exist? | 24 | 6d |
| +17 | L/S Equity Career London | 11 | 3d |
| +13 | Hedge Fund Pivot | 3 | 17h |
| +11 | Buy Side Credit - Seats / Guide | 1 | 1d |
| +11 | Mid-career shift to buy side with niche background | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Nvm | 6 | 3d |
| +9 | Wfh / work remotely at MMs or SMs? | 5 | 20h |
| 0 | Hedge funds | 1 | 23h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
For credit and distressed, Rx is better. For equity, it really doesn't matter.
Bump
Architecto ipsa dolores molestiae pariatur suscipit. Impedit sapiente nostrum reiciendis doloremque labore veniam. Aut voluptates repellat asperiores maiores rem consequatur odio.
Laborum commodi sed error cum delectus. Sit incidunt sunt aliquid numquam. Quia praesentium earum quidem tempora magni voluptatem architecto. Eligendi libero in blanditiis voluptates. Cumque placeat debitis assumenda molestiae sapiente cum veniam. Enim ad et minus commodi eos aperiam.
Aut neque facilis aut sit maiores quo. Eum voluptatem voluptatibus odit corrupti. Animi dolore ut eveniet ut tempora tenetur dolore dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...