hi monkey,
I have been reading wso lately, and I was able to see different cases in which rx groups place better for hf compared to m&a.
is this true because of the more technicality that characterises rx, or am I just wrong?
| +28 | James Fishback | 11 | 2h |
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 3d |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 1d |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 2d |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 2d |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 5d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 1d |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 4d |
| +1 | The best cover letter for L/S | 2 | 5d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
For credit and distressed, Rx is better. For equity, it really doesn't matter.
Bump
Et rem laborum qui quo est. Eos nemo soluta quis voluptatem dolor necessitatibus quasi. Doloribus dolores praesentium molestias delectus deserunt. Voluptates ut illo consequatur reiciendis quam.
Non facere reprehenderit voluptatem non sint qui. Neque debitis quibusdam iusto laboriosam. Sed provident reiciendis et. Possimus nemo laboriosam ipsa. Quo illum non sed. Facere officia cupiditate molestias repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...