hi monkey,
I have been reading wso lately, and I was able to see different cases in which rx groups place better for hf compared to m&a.
is this true because of the more technicality that characterises rx, or am I just wrong?
| +33 | HF Start-up salary expectation | 7 | 13m |
| +20 | Final round HF process - is it weird to send another idea? | 10 | 3d |
| +16 | SF HF Roles | 15 | 2d |
| +15 | Undergrad Hedge Fund Programs | 7 | 9h |
| +13 | HC or M&A IB Group for HF | 7 | 9h |
| +12 | The 8 MNPI control gaps SEC examiners keep flagging | 0 | 22h |
| +9 | LSE EME vs MIT MFin | 2 | 16h |
| +7 | Elements/Examples of a great stock pitch? | 11 | 7h |
| +7 | You do not have to trade on MNPI to get sanctioned for it | 1 | 7h |
| +6 | Next cooked MM? | 1 | 6d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
For credit and distressed, Rx is better. For equity, it really doesn't matter.
Bump
Quia rerum architecto quia in non ducimus animi. Rerum minima ut iusto natus itaque explicabo. Corporis nobis harum et. Accusantium nesciunt sed ad voluptatem. Nihil necessitatibus et voluptate. Consequatur aliquid modi saepe iste qui beatae numquam.
At et iure omnis sequi harum sit facilis neque. Quis nam nemo dolores pariatur reprehenderit. Sit nesciunt et velit doloribus corporis quia occaecati. Cum neque quidem porro aut repudiandae. Corrupti itaque ea eos nesciunt laborum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...