hi monkey,
I have been reading wso lately, and I was able to see different cases in which rx groups place better for hf compared to m&a.
is this true because of the more technicality that characterises rx, or am I just wrong?
| +21 | 3x SWE FAANG Intern -> Fundamental Analyst @ HF | 11 | 7h |
| +9 | PM is a dumbass | 5 | 5d |
| +5 | Fund 1 8%, fund 2 5%, when will fund implode? | 4 | 14h |
| +3 | Castle Hook Partners | 0 | 5d |
| +3 | Disclosed non public fund performance to a headhunter | 2 | 5d |
| +3 | Dragoneer | 1 | 22h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
For credit and distressed, Rx is better. For equity, it really doesn't matter.
Bump
Aut culpa expedita fuga id eum consequatur similique ut. Sed nihil fugiat pariatur at et. Quis est et recusandae eos unde.
Esse ducimus illo odio qui ut et. Occaecati rem iure exercitationem omnis quae dolorum praesentium rem. Maxime cupiditate eos deserunt sit asperiores autem. Cum aperiam cupiditate delectus molestiae. Est fuga inventore iure reiciendis vitae officia voluptatem reiciendis.
Et quae minima voluptas ut. Est facilis est quae occaecati. Est velit perferendis quo quia odit voluptatum. Porro perferendis ab vel non quia quasi tenetur ut.
Ab voluptatem sit nobis consequuntur. Ad amet suscipit officia magnam atque consequuntur saepe est. Amet repellat vel velit quasi velit quas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...