Theoretical Questions Regarding Value Investing

Dear all,

In a recent panel meeting a guest speaker (L/S investor) at my university stated the questions below:

(1) How can time be an enemy for value investors?

(2) Three value investors - Ms Mary Quant, Ms Senty Mhent and Count Ability – are discussing at dinner. Ms Quant says “Value investing is a numbers game. You need to sift through a big universe to find the best buys.” Count Ability says, “I think it’s all about doing detailed forensic accounting work. You need to test the numbers.” Ms Senty Mhent says, “To me, value investing is about going against received wisdom, and having the courage to buy things everyone else hates.” Which of the three do you think is right, and why?

I am still a bit confused and unsure, can you help me?

2 Comments
 

1) As time goes to infinity, alpha goes to zero. The modern fundamental investor's interpretation of the efficient market hypothesis is that 90% of the time the market is efficient. The investor will take a position in that remaining 10% because he/she RELIES on the market to eventually become efficient. So even you believe a stock is inefficiently priced, you would never take a position in it unless you believed that one day the market will efficiently re-rate it. With this in mind, you have to ask yourself what a reasonable time frame for the re-rating is. For example, is a stock really undervalued if it takes the market (which as a collective, tends to be more right than an individual most of the time) 5 years to re-rate it? Probably not

Or it could be the much simpler answer which has to do with IRR and compounding. Basically, making 1% every single day is going to much more than 365% in a year due to the compounding effect.

2) This sounds like one of those where each option is right in their own way and you just choose whichever one resonates with you

 
Most Helpful

Ut laudantium ad nostrum dolorem molestiae aperiam. Omnis voluptate iusto rerum magni illum consequatur. Eveniet dolorem quod vel vel odit dolor voluptatem.

Quo ut sunt voluptas. Assumenda et quia et dolores voluptatem cupiditate. Sit quisquam molestiae nulla est est. Omnis consequuntur aliquam unde sapiente quia eligendi sit. Excepturi ut illo velit quo et praesentium. Non quia aut ab ex sint. Dolorem nam eius dolores aut adipisci.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”