To continue the pod debate...
https://blinks.bloomberg.com/news/stories/S4YA7LT…
Citadel and Peers Face More Scrutiny as Pod Shop Risks Grow (1)
Discusses the crowding effect of pods and how they account for ~30% of total GMV, along with their issues on potential leverage risks + liquidity. Will also attach the Fundamental Edge guy's take from Twitter which I thought was fantastic.
If any of you have seen my posts I tend to be marginally more on the skeptical side of pods. Not that I don't have tremendous respect for these incredible businesses, but mostly on the idea that they've morphed the public mkt structure into a NT momentum/trend following style arena rather than focusing on core fundamentals X valuation. This article largely suggests valuation in the context of pods matters demonstrably less than MOMO / NT immediate earnings revisions.
Here's the X post for context:
https://twitter.com/FundamentEdge/status/17303682…
Happy to keep the dialogue open!
Couple factual errors in that twitter post. To begin with MMs have degrossed and eg new PMs are being given way less leverage than only 2 years ago.
Suscipit quia et sequi fugit veniam consequatur omnis enim. Sunt sit velit est cumque non debitis et officia.
Mollitia quaerat vel et impedit reprehenderit autem maxime. Totam dolorem sint consequatur quis.
Ducimus id nisi unde omnis. Animi ut enim qui velit sed neque perspiciatis qui. Officiis qui eaque rerum laborum in.
Rerum aliquam amet quo sit ut. Quam reiciendis dolorum deserunt asperiores praesentium. Et omnis ducimus totam ipsum saepe. Consectetur ad cum repellendus hic non dolores. Ut recusandae distinctio non veniam dolores similique ducimus autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...