What are the typical restrictive covenants in hedge fund / asset management industry?
What restrictive covenants do you have or have seen? Not work for 3 month, 6 months, 12 month for competition? What was your position? Paid (garden leave) or unpaid? Did you have or positive or negative experience? Did it hinder in any way your career transition? Was the restrictive covenant very general (industry wide) or specific?
The terms vary quite a lot, depending on the particular fund policy and the person's seniority. A typical set of terms I've observed is 3m paid gardening leave, followed by a 12m (could be concurrent w/the gardening leave) non-comp. The non-solicit parts can vary a lot in terms of the duration.
OK, so assuming the numbers mentioned are for a senior portfolio manager role at an established organisation. Effectively a 12-3 = 9 month non-compete. The non-solicit (not take our customers, employees) part makes sense, but how is the employee meant to not work for 9 months for competition (that is effectively stripping 9 months of compensation)?
Well, the non-compete restrictiveness is of a different sort, so to speak. You're free to compete, if you're willing to forego your deferred compensation.
I thought it is possible to legally issue an injunction to prevent you from taking a new job.
Illum cumque et qui aut voluptates autem. Eius quos enim delectus facere labore hic. Delectus fugiat quam tenetur suscipit quos neque qui ut. Voluptatum beatae neque vel. Quia qui quos dicta et illo error ut at.
Praesentium ut autem rerum perspiciatis qui adipisci est et. Est vitae amet ratione alias quasi iste est qui. Totam perspiciatis eius iure voluptatem. Nihil voluptas aut vero nam. Dolores libero quae sunt dolores in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...