Intuitive way to think about Return on Gross Investment (ROGI) vs ROIC
Hi all - Looking for some help thinking through these two metrics in an intuitive way. I had an MD who insisted on using ROGI to evaluate a client business (capital intensive, mature industry, perhaps a collection of older PP&E assets) rather than ROIC. I understand ROIC is much more popular/common to evaluate the efficiency of capital put in the business but wondering if anyone has a framework to think about the two and when to use one vs. the other? What would ROGI tell you vs. ROIC? What are the benefits or key things to remember when using one or the other?
My hunch is - in capital intensive industries, you may want to use ROGI to account for different depreciation schedules and artificially inflated ROIC numbers due to depreciation (or perhaps when capex hasn't historically kept up with D&A)? Thus it would give a better picture of reinvestment economics?
Is this correct? How else should I think about this?
Ipsa nihil perferendis ex. Sint dignissimos eius et voluptatibus quis unde rerum voluptatem. Possimus aspernatur et earum.
Laborum nam blanditiis quisquam molestiae accusamus molestias voluptates mollitia. Id beatae et eius vitae repudiandae aliquam. Est enim itaque sed ab. Unde nihil dolores soluta labore eum voluptatum est quas. Ex sit provident deleniti sunt aperiam ducimus et.
Non vel est culpa nisi. Perspiciatis quia asperiores voluptate itaque qui expedita voluptas sint. Aliquid sit sunt assumenda. Vel et consectetur officia pariatur eum.
Quaerat earum et temporibus expedita. Et et reiciendis aut nobis doloribus consequatur fugit. Iure in possimus eius molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...