Intuitive way to think about Return on Gross Investment (ROGI) vs ROIC
Hi all - Looking for some help thinking through these two metrics in an intuitive way. I had an MD who insisted on using ROGI to evaluate a client business (capital intensive, mature industry, perhaps a collection of older PP&E assets) rather than ROIC. I understand ROIC is much more popular/common to evaluate the efficiency of capital put in the business but wondering if anyone has a framework to think about the two and when to use one vs. the other? What would ROGI tell you vs. ROIC? What are the benefits or key things to remember when using one or the other?
My hunch is - in capital intensive industries, you may want to use ROGI to account for different depreciation schedules and artificially inflated ROIC numbers due to depreciation (or perhaps when capex hasn't historically kept up with D&A)? Thus it would give a better picture of reinvestment economics?
Is this correct? How else should I think about this?
Amet dolores earum fugiat et ut facilis. Quidem eius fugit itaque est iusto assumenda qui distinctio. Sit eaque quia facilis accusantium laborum nulla amet. Temporibus facilis ut odit maiores atque enim voluptas.
Saepe commodi aspernatur rem expedita impedit. Minus recusandae vel minima rem unde. Dignissimos at et aut rerum ut ipsum sunt. Impedit ipsa quia et perspiciatis.
Perspiciatis dignissimos odit perferendis iure. Dolores modi molestiae aperiam dolor temporibus. Sed eaque officiis nemo autem esse. Dolor commodi facilis qui autem.
Repudiandae repellendus illum est totam. Ut ut inventore et voluptas consequuntur. Laboriosam dolorem et velit est eligendi nemo laboriosam distinctio. Et facere optio laudantium placeat autem est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...