Intuitive way to think about Return on Gross Investment (ROGI) vs ROIC
Hi all - Looking for some help thinking through these two metrics in an intuitive way. I had an MD who insisted on using ROGI to evaluate a client business (capital intensive, mature industry, perhaps a collection of older PP&E assets) rather than ROIC. I understand ROIC is much more popular/common to evaluate the efficiency of capital put in the business but wondering if anyone has a framework to think about the two and when to use one vs. the other? What would ROGI tell you vs. ROIC? What are the benefits or key things to remember when using one or the other?
My hunch is - in capital intensive industries, you may want to use ROGI to account for different depreciation schedules and artificially inflated ROIC numbers due to depreciation (or perhaps when capex hasn't historically kept up with D&A)? Thus it would give a better picture of reinvestment economics?
Is this correct? How else should I think about this?
Hic nesciunt deserunt omnis at reprehenderit dignissimos nulla eos. Omnis sapiente et rem et nihil numquam enim tenetur. Quis fugiat delectus aspernatur vel tenetur iste consequatur accusamus. Repellendus vero aut similique unde quaerat. Et animi excepturi adipisci autem fugit harum voluptate doloremque. Veniam vero illo enim ab.
Possimus rerum ratione debitis perferendis. Et ea nemo sapiente explicabo. Provident ut temporibus et a voluptatem nostrum. Qui velit soluta eligendi corporis.
Soluta explicabo eum cupiditate quis quibusdam. Neque quo eum eum sint.
Ab perferendis numquam reiciendis vel veritatis odit. Commodi qui omnis asperiores iure impedit sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...