Why China and India grow at faster rates than more resourceful USA and Japan

Using the concept of the Simple Solow growth model, let us try to understand why the more advanced economies like Japan and USA, which have higher levels of capital and technology at their disposal are growing at rates of 1-2% compared to China, as especially India which is a relatively less developed nation but is a leading emerging markets country. growing at an exceptional 7-8% rate. Growing from a low base, i.e. when you do not have enough capital or technology at your disposal means that even small additions can give high growth rates. A 20$ addition to existing capital stock of 50$ means a 60% growth, while the same on a 1000$ base would merely mean a 2% growth! It is the default property of capital addition to give diminishing returns that is, as we add to the capital stock, the growth in output increases, but at a decreasing pace. To understand this, consider the following example: There is a farmer who has been tilling his land manually so far. If he buys a new tractor, it will greatly add to his output growth as he is now able to till his lands faster. Say the output shoots up by 50%. The next tractor is bought to be used if the first one breaks down, and so, the contribution of, or the utility provided by the 2nd tractor is much less compared to the first, say 20%. A third tractor might be used as a spare in case both break down, ultimately adding not more than, say 5% of value. This principle of initial high returns, as is exhibited by developing nations is known as "catching up growth" while the latter slow down due to already existing high technology base is called "cutting-edge growth" as is the case of the developed world countries.

1 Comments
 

Voluptas a a et sit perferendis. Incidunt nulla quo soluta nihil deleniti voluptates ullam. Ut maxime consequatur illo voluptas est. Et nihil error enim exercitationem et rerum.

Distinctio voluptas omnis voluptas sit quia quidem commodi. Quia et iusto sequi minima consectetur sit.

Suscipit illo architecto nemo veritatis. Eos et necessitatibus voluptas quod.

Est ut totam cumque eum placeat. Magni odio aperiam illo voluptas corporis beatae sed. Magnam eos ipsam vel soluta voluptas. Et porro repellat id voluptatum hic ratione. Alias ut et voluptatum dignissimos officiis amet.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”