Hi,
I was just wondering the pros and cons of staying on for a third year analyst. I am wondering how this may affect buy-side recruiting. Thank you!
| +138 | UBS Catastrophic Q1-Q3 26, M&A -17%, Outside Top 10 in Americas, EMEA & APAC | 38 | 1h |
| +60 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 23 | 3h |
| +46 | No return offer - UPDATE. | 12 | 58m |
| +29 | Evercore poaches Baird DC Defense Team | 18 | 21h |
| +22 | Best Houston Banks for Culture in 2026 | 15 | 41m |
| +21 | Normal for lateral process to go +2 months? | 4 | 1d |
| +18 | Lack of talent in IB! | 19 | 9h |
| +17 | Internal lateral from coverage to M&A (focused on coverage) | 4 | 22h |
| +15 | How standard is weekend work in IBD? | 7 | 4h |
| +15 | Discussion Transaction Experience in Lateral Interviews | 3 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
bump
following
NTD: I've focused more on the pros, since I think people on this forum generally lean towards being pro-PE rather than banking
Pros:
You're already established. Your superiors will already trust you (they have to, if you're receiving an extension to your contract) and you won't have to put in as much nonsense face time - by this point, they should know you get your work done.
You'll be able to delegate crappier tasks to your juniors, while you will most likely be the most junior person at whatever type of buy side shop you go to. Depending on the staffing model of your team, this could also allow you to get better and more interesting deal flow.
Depending on your bank vs. exit opps, you might get better pay as a 3rd year than as a 1st year associate on the buy side. Especially true for e.g. middle market PE shops or credit funds. Your IB team will likely be trying to keep you on as an associate, and will give you a big bonus to sweeten the deal.
You already know your team and work/life balance, while it can be hard to gauge a new job based just on interviews. The devil you know, right?
Cons:
Work is generally less interesting (IMO) on the sell side. Being a middle man vs. making investment decisions and all of that stereotypical stuff.
You might be pigeon-holed into banking, especially if you tried and failed to recruit for the buy side. Could make things more difficult down the road if you decide to switch, but not necessarily. Anecdotally I've heard this really only starts once you're an associate proper, but there isn't really any data I'm aware of.
Hours are most likely worse in banking, being on call for clients and such. Duh.
Good stuff, thanks!
Mollitia quo veritatis maxime ut quia. Possimus non quam sit in corrupti velit doloribus. Et ea ab deserunt saepe.
Vero quo est quisquam. Praesentium itaque placeat labore rerum in delectus est. Enim ea est enim quis officiis libero est. Quasi nihil sit numquam voluptatem. Quas quis aut et quo. Sint doloribus enim facilis qui quibusdam aut nemo.
Possimus velit sint non aut expedita voluptatem mollitia. Aut accusamus beatae placeat ducimus.
Accusamus non sint voluptas. A aspernatur beatae impedit omnis. Reprehenderit tempora ut consequatur et temporibus. Sunt quam maxime ut consequatur fugiat et. Voluptas ipsum totam deserunt nam expedita temporibus nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...